Detecting Magnetic Monopoles with Induced Currents in a Wire Loop

  • Thread starter Charlie G
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Detection
In summary: This means that your result is incorrect and may have been caused by considering the magnetic field only along the ring's axis. In summary, when detecting magnetic monopoles through induced currents in a wire loop, the signal would be an exponentially increasing current that then decreases exponentially. The direction of the current will always be the same and its magnitude will decrease as the monopole passes through the loop. As for the problem with the superconducting ring, the electric field induced at a point away from the axis should weaken as the distance from the axis increases, due to the decrease in magnetic flux. Hence, the result obtained may be incorrect and may have been influenced by only considering the magnetic field along the axis.
  • #1
Charlie G
116
0
Hi, I just submitted some homework that had a question that I'd really like to know the answer to now (rather than waiting on getting the homework back). The question asked to plot the current induced in a loop of wire as a magnetic monopole passed through it. My graph showed the current increasing exponentially as the monopole approached (I believed this to be the case since the rate that the flux changes is increasing as the distance is closed).

Once on the other side of the loop I thought the direction of the changes in the magnetic field would still point in the same direction as the approach so that the current still runs in the same direction but is decreasing exponentially now (whereas a dipole induces a current opposite in direction after passing through the center?)

So I suppose my question is this: when trying to detect magnetic monopoles by means of induced currents in a loop of wire, is the 'signal' for a monopole a first exponentially increasing current that then decreases exponentially, while the signal for the typical dipole is first an increasing current (growing quicker than with the monopole, since the field is 1/r^3) that changes direction and then decreases?


Also, just out of curiosity, another problem involved a superconducting ring moving along its' axis at a constant speed towards some point near the ring's axis (a distance y from the axis) and asked to determine the electric field induced at the point. Since E=emf/L and the emf has a factor y^2 (I used a ring of radius y around the axis as my 'flux surface', with area pi*y^2) and the length has y (2*pi*y = L) in it, my electric field was thus proportional to y, the distance from the axis of the superconducting ring.

This result seems incorrect to me, intuitively speaking it would seem the electric field would weaken as you move away from the ring's axis, but perhaps by expanding out you now have more magnetic field lines contributing to the flux, though this seemed spurious since I began only considering the magnetic field along the ring's axis, not anywhere else. So maybe one of you guys can tell me if the result I got was valid.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In regards to your first question, yes, the signal for a magnetic monopole would be an exponentially increasing current that then decreases exponentially as it passes through the loop. The current will always flow in the same direction, and the magnitude of the current will decrease as the monopole passes through the loop. As for your second question, the electric field induced at the point, y, away from the superconducting ring's axis should indeed weaken as you move away from the ring's axis. This is because the magnetic flux through the surface area is decreasing with distance, so the induced EMF, and thus the electric field, is decreasing.
 

1. What are magnetic monopoles?

Magnetic monopoles are hypothetical particles that possess only one magnetic pole, either a north pole or a south pole, unlike regular magnets which have both. They have not yet been observed in nature, but their existence is predicted by various theories in physics.

2. How can we detect magnetic monopoles?

One proposed method for detecting magnetic monopoles is by using induced currents in a wire loop. When a monopole passes through the loop, it would induce a current in the wire which can be measured and used to infer the presence of the monopole.

3. What is the significance of detecting magnetic monopoles?

The detection of magnetic monopoles would have immense implications for our understanding of fundamental physics. It could potentially provide evidence for new theories and open up new avenues for research in areas such as particle physics and cosmology.

4. Are there any challenges in detecting magnetic monopoles with induced currents?

Yes, there are several challenges to overcome in this method. One major challenge is the extremely small size of monopoles, making them difficult to detect. Additionally, the induced currents can also be very weak, requiring sensitive equipment for detection.

5. Has there been any success in detecting magnetic monopoles using this method?

So far, there have been no confirmed detections of magnetic monopoles using induced currents in a wire loop. However, there have been some experiments that have reported promising results, and research in this area is ongoing.

Similar threads

  • Classical Physics
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
639
  • Classical Physics
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • General Engineering
Replies
9
Views
873
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
742
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
209
Replies
9
Views
917
  • Classical Physics
Replies
8
Views
776
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top