Was religion ever meant to give absolute truth?

In summary: It is certainly different from the traditional view of things where there are absolute truths that apply to everyone.I have to disagree on this one. Yes, you are correct that pain is a subjective experience, but not all truths can be subjective. Take a look at a self evident truth: "I exist." That is an absolute truth that MUST be universal, because if I did not exist, I would not be able to be typing this post right now. Another example is the Law of Non-contradiction. For those who don't know, this law states that the same thing cannot be two different things at the same time. For example, the green sweater I am wearing
  • #1
revan
13
0
I have thought and thought about this over and over, and time and again, I come to the conclusion that there cannot be any 'absolute truths', about anything, as after all, each persons reality is different. Just as time is relevant to the observer etc. I believe so too is reality and therefore there is no Universal truth that can apply to us all, we do what we can/must do, the truth and how it applies to reality differs in our own experience.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
revan said:
I have thought and thought about this over and over, and time and again, I come to the conclusion that there cannot be any 'absolute truths', about anything, as after all, each persons reality is different. Just as time is relevant to the observer etc. I believe so too is reality and therefore there is no Universal truth that can apply to us all, we do what we can/must do, the truth and how it applies to reality differs in our own experience.


I really have to agree with you. Even the bruited Theory of Everything in science, if they ever find it, won't be an absolute truth, since like any scientific theory it is always subject to later falsification by new evidence.
 
  • #3
But we all know absolute truths. 'Something exists' is an absolute truth. 'I am in pain' also, as long as you are. (Actually one could quibble about the words here, but the principle holds). Most philosophers conclude that absolute truth (certain knowledge) is attainable, but only via direct experience.
 
  • #4
Most philosophers conclude that absolute truth (certain knowledge) is attainable, but only via direct experience.

Yes that is true, but my point, is that these absolute truths, are not universal. In other words, what is a certainty for you, is not a certainty for me. You talk about pain, but that cannot be an absolute, yes you do feel hurt, however, the effect of the pain differs from person to person, so what is absolute agony to one person, may not bother another person as much.
 
  • #5
Yes that is true, but my point, is that these absolute truths, are not universal. In other words, what is a certainty for you, is not a certainty for me. You talk about pain, but that cannot be an absolute, yes you do feel hurt, however, the effect of the pain differs from person to person, so what is absolute agony to one person, may not bother another person as much.

I have to disagree on this one. Yes, you are correct that pain is a subjective experience, but not all truths can be subjective. Take a look at a self evident truth: "I exist." That is an absolute truth that MUST be universal, because if I did not exist, I would not be able to be typing this post right now.

Another example is the Law of Non-contradiction. For those who don't know, this law states that the same thing cannot be two different things at the same time. For example, the green sweater I am wearing right now is not a blue sweater. This law is universal to everybody, cannot be changed, because we all know that a triangle cannot be a circle, blue cannot be green, etc.

And so, I will make this statement:
Truth is subjective. Is that true?
 
  • #6
I exist is true for me. You and your post may be a figment of my imagination, and I may with this typing, be like Don Quixote, tilting at giants of my own mind.
 
  • #7
revan said:
Yes that is true, but my point, is that these absolute truths, are not universal. In other words, what is a certainty for you, is not a certainty for me. You talk about pain, but that cannot be an absolute, yes you do feel hurt, however, the effect of the pain differs from person to person, so what is absolute agony to one person, may not bother another person as much.
I see what you mean. It seems that we can know truths but that we cannot show we know them to anyone else, (as mystics have always asserted).
 
  • #8
revan said:
I come to the conclusion that there cannot be any 'absolute truths', about anything, as after all, each persons reality is different. Just as time is relevant to the observer etc. I believe so too is reality and therefore there is no Universal truth...

Einstein's theories of relativity suggest that some things are relative and some things are absolute. eg. Motion is relative but accelloration is absolute. The theories don't support that "everything is relative", just the passage of time. There is a reality out there, Einstein simply showed that it was 4D not 3D. We don't experience this directly, but it is real. Quantum mechanics is the theory that really challenges realism.

I find that to deny objective reality leads to ontological doubt, which is a fruitless belief when it comes to controlling my experience, in stark contrast to education.

If there is no reality out there, I wouldn't study science to understand the universe, I need to spend the time meditating. Because why does my mind generate such an unpleasant universe for me to live in?
 
Last edited:
  • #9
I really have to agree with you. Even the bruited Theory of Everything in science, if they ever find it, won't be an absolute truth, since like any scientific theory it is always subject to later falsification by new evidence.
True. true... lol. But that is the beauty of it. Even though we all don't see the same things the same way, we can get an overall agreement. That is the closest we can come to truth.
As I see it, if the divine creator (God) wanted to see us ecxell as a race, God would want to see us form societies, live peacefully, and advance. Now how would we do that if we where all telling each other lies. If we lied like crazy all logic would become watery, and knowledge would be left up to imagination.
So when religious text says not to lie, it has Good reason behind it.

_______________________________
In seeking wisdom thou art wise; in imagining that thou hast attained it - thou art a fool.
Lord Chesterfield
 
  • #10
"If the most abstract imagination can not prove a theory wrong, then in consequence, it must be correct."
That does have to do with the conversation, just in an abstract fashion.
_________________________________________
In seeking wisdom thou art wise; in imagining that thou hast attained it - thou art a fool.
Lord Chesterfield
 

1. What is the definition of "absolute truth" in relation to religion?

"Absolute truth" in religion refers to the idea that a particular religion or belief system contains all the answers and explanations for the nature of existence, morality, and the universe. It is often seen as a source of ultimate authority and infallibility.

2. Is it possible for a religion to provide absolute truth?

This is a highly debated topic and there is no definitive answer. Some argue that religion offers spiritual truths that cannot be proven or disproven, while others believe that absolute truth can only be found through scientific evidence and rational thinking.

3. Why do different religions have different interpretations of truth?

Religious beliefs and interpretations are often influenced by cultural, historical, and societal factors. Additionally, different religions may have different core beliefs and doctrines, leading to varying interpretations of truth.

4. Can religion and science coexist in providing absolute truth?

Some believe that religion and science can complement each other in understanding the world, while others see them as conflicting approaches to truth. Ultimately, the answer to this question may depend on individual beliefs and perspectives.

5. How has the concept of absolute truth in religion evolved over time?

The idea of absolute truth in religion has evolved throughout history, with different religions and belief systems offering different interpretations and understandings of truth. In modern times, the concept has been challenged and redefined by advancements in science and technology.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
18
Views
966
Replies
5
Views
930
  • General Discussion
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
819
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
659
  • General Discussion
Replies
6
Views
873
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top