Lazy American Students: Boston Globe Editorial

  • Thread starter gravenewworld
  • Start date
  • Tags
    students
In summary, the article discusses lazy American students who lack basic geography skills and how this affects their education. The article also discusses how policies like No Child Left Behind play a role in this problem.
  • #36
mgb_phys said:
Not just in school.
I'm listening to a celebrity "things I've never done" type program.
A presenter of trendy history programs is claiming that they have never been able to assemble IKEA furniture - somehow in a world where nobody would admit not being familiar with every political and artistic event for centuries it's perfectly acceptable and even 'cool' to claim not to understand the Allen key.


How could a history buff not know that Tim Allen invented the Allen key?! :uhh:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
Here's the longer version:





HAHAHAHH "Who is Tony Blair?"


"I don't know man. A skateboarder?"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #38
Scientist at Work | Jon Miller
Scientific Savvy? In U.S., Not Much

While scientific literacy has doubled over the past two decades, only 20 to 25 percent of Americans are "scientifically savvy and alert," he said in an interview. Most of the rest "don't have a clue." At a time when science permeates debates on everything from global warming to stem cell research, he said, people's inability to understand basic scientific concepts undermines their ability to take part in the democratic process.



http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/30/s...r=1&ex=1125547200&en=631977063d726261&ei=5070
 
  • #39
BobG said:
How could a history buff not know that Tim Allen invented the Allen key?! :uhh:

That got me wiki'ed, I didn't realize that the one true Robertson screw came first.
 
  • #40
or the shape of a single freakin' constellation.

Well its kinda hard when i look up at the night sky and see nothing. I wouldn't be surprised if kids growing up today had no knowledge of stars either.
 
  • #41
mgb_phys said:
leeroy said:
think everyone should be able to find every country in the world on a map. That should be basic geography.
Really? Pop-quiz how may countries are there ?
The "number of countries" in the world changes every year. Areas are always in dispute, the question of whether a state is sovereign will be answered differently depending on who you ask, and some bodies refuse to recognize other bodies. I've seen the numbers recently placed anywhere between 192 and 217. So really, you producing that question probably only shows your own lack of knowledge.
 
Last edited:
  • #42
Oerg said:
I would say part of the problem is cultural, where excelling in academia is generally perceived negatively among your peers in school.

I actually do not think that this is very true. Your peers in school do not like people who look down on them or make them feel stupid. When I was in school the only nerds that got beat up and messed with were the ones that treated jocks and preps poorly. My friends and I were total geeks and got along with just about everyone no matter how well or poorly we did in our classes.

One day one of the jocks in my high school flipped out and put one of the nerds into the hospital for a week. Everyone said that it was because the kid was a nerd or because (as many people suspected) he was gay. One of my best friends is a geek and bisexual and got along with that same jock just fine. The only difference between my friend and the other kid was that the other kid was an uptight snob.
 
  • #43
I'm not going to lie, I'd lay right in there with the group of lazy American students. I've only made it this far because everything prior to college (even the first year of college, really) was an absolute joke in terms of difficulty. I'm not going to say "my intellect wasn't challenged and the school system failed me! Waaah!" because I could have easily picked up a book and learned more advanced stuff on my own, but really? I'm a teenager and prefer to spend my time doing other things. Important, scholarly things like Grand Theft Auto.

However, the people in those videos...words can not describe (that or my lexicon fails me (damn I hope I used that word correctly)) the massive amount of /facepalm I feel as I watch them struggle.
 
  • #44
Last edited by a moderator:
<h2>1. What is the main argument of the Boston Globe editorial?</h2><p>The main argument of the Boston Globe editorial is that American students are becoming increasingly lazy and entitled, leading to a decline in academic performance and work ethic.</p><h2>2. How does the editorial define laziness?</h2><p>The editorial defines laziness as a lack of motivation, effort, and responsibility in academic pursuits. This includes skipping classes, not completing assignments, and relying on technology for easy answers.</p><h2>3. What evidence does the editorial use to support its claims?</h2><p>The editorial cites statistics such as the decrease in average study time and increase in grade inflation among American students. It also references personal anecdotes from teachers and professors who have witnessed a decline in work ethic and academic performance.</p><h2>4. What solutions does the editorial propose to address the issue of lazy American students?</h2><p>The editorial suggests that parents, teachers, and society as a whole need to hold students accountable for their actions and instill a stronger work ethic. It also calls for a shift in the education system to prioritize critical thinking and problem-solving skills over rote memorization.</p><h2>5. How has the editorial been received by the public?</h2><p>The editorial has sparked a debate among the public, with some agreeing with its claims and others criticizing it for being too harsh on students. Some have also pointed out that there may be underlying societal and economic factors that contribute to the perceived laziness of American students.</p>

1. What is the main argument of the Boston Globe editorial?

The main argument of the Boston Globe editorial is that American students are becoming increasingly lazy and entitled, leading to a decline in academic performance and work ethic.

2. How does the editorial define laziness?

The editorial defines laziness as a lack of motivation, effort, and responsibility in academic pursuits. This includes skipping classes, not completing assignments, and relying on technology for easy answers.

3. What evidence does the editorial use to support its claims?

The editorial cites statistics such as the decrease in average study time and increase in grade inflation among American students. It also references personal anecdotes from teachers and professors who have witnessed a decline in work ethic and academic performance.

4. What solutions does the editorial propose to address the issue of lazy American students?

The editorial suggests that parents, teachers, and society as a whole need to hold students accountable for their actions and instill a stronger work ethic. It also calls for a shift in the education system to prioritize critical thinking and problem-solving skills over rote memorization.

5. How has the editorial been received by the public?

The editorial has sparked a debate among the public, with some agreeing with its claims and others criticizing it for being too harsh on students. Some have also pointed out that there may be underlying societal and economic factors that contribute to the perceived laziness of American students.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
7
Replies
241
Views
22K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
3
Replies
76
Views
10K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • General Discussion
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top