Is Cold Fusion Possible with Palladium and Heavy Water?

In summary, the article discusses the history of cold fusion and how it has failed to be replicated. It also discusses the different theories behind how cold fusion works.
  • #1
Kojac
26
0
how about cold fusion? I know it's got avid supporters as well as those who say it's total B.S. last I heard, it had something to do with the way Palladium acts in hard water... I'm going to go look some of that up. I want input! anyway, i hear it's possible.

edit: thanks...didn't even notice i put in hard instead of heavy. Yadda yadda water with deuterium instead of normal hydrogen. I'm not actually stupid...just verbally retarded.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
The folks who said they had discovered it rushed to get their "findings" out to the public without running it past peer review.

Every attempt to reproduce the experiment by third parties has failed.

Unfortunately, it's not possible (at this time... another method could be discovered in the future).
 
  • #3
enigma said:
Every attempt to reproduce the experiment by third parties has failed.
Actually, it was my understanding that their results have finally been reproduced, the problem at the time was Pons and Fleischman wouldn't tell anyone what they did. The problem is, of course, the effect they witnessed wasn't fusion.

And that's heavy water, Kojac. The hypothesis was that deuterium infused in a palladium matrix (essentially a solid solution) would push the deuterium together enough to cause fusion. It didn't. IIRc, what they ended up with was an expensive but mundane electrolytic cell.
 
  • #4
Ah. I haven't been following up on the topic.

Russ's comments are most likely closer to reality than mine.
 
  • #5
Can cold fusion be encouraged by cancelling the electric charges of protons so they will come together at a low energy input? Presumably one would need to
find a source of negative charges that could be injected between the quarks of a proton.How about trying to trap protons in a C-60 buckyball to squeeze them together.
Apparently buckyballs can be compressed until they are hard as diamonds, so the bonds between the carbon atoms must be hard to break.
 
  • #6
I have heard about muonic catalized fusion. When I studied this I was told that it was produced by a bombardment of such particles over H-H molecules. They could get rid of the electrons shared, and put together the two nucleus due to the muon greater mass. But I'm not sure.
 
  • #7
Kojac said:
how about cold fusion? I know it's got avid supporters as well as those who say it's total B.S. last I heard, it had something to do with the way Palladium acts in heavy water... I'm going to go look some of that up. I want input! anyway, i hear it's possible.

I had heard, over 50 years ago, that "HOT" Palladium metal would fractionally separate hydrogen from other molecules like methane - i.e., it was a sieve that passed only hydrogen isotopes.

There have been "warm" application of DD and DT fusion. As far back as 1951, the US Pu bombs that previously contained an inertially activated "Tom" Po/Be triggering neutron source (that produced nominally 6 neutrons in the 5 or so microsecond Pu burn-time) were altered by replacing the Po/Be with Deuterides or Tritides of Uranium, Hafnium etc that were inertially compressed and that thus yielded as many as a billion fusion neutrons. The "tom" was renamed "Nemo".
Later there was invented a vacuum tube that had a triton "gun" that accelerated with 180 Kilovolts, a relatively continuous stream of tritons into a deuterated target - this latter vacuum tube was used in labs as well as in bombs. Not only is the DT process 50-fold more easy to produce fusion neutrons than the DD process, but the energy of the DT neutrons is 14.5 MeV compared to the 2.5 MeV energy of the DD neutrons.

The secret reason why a fusion "reactor" is so out of reach (without improved technology) is because most of the fusion energy is carried off by the neutrons that flow rather freely through walls of the reactor. Frankly, I believe that a thick water or paraffin jacket could expedite the liberation of ordinary hydrogen (neutron bombardment of water, unlike electrolysis that produces both oxygen and hydrogen gases, produces only hydrogen gas). The hydrogen fuel cell energy would then be available to sustain an electronically induced continuous fusion. Cheers, Jim
 

What is cold fusion?

Cold fusion is a hypothesized type of nuclear reaction that occurs at or near room temperature, rather than at temperatures in the millions of degrees like traditional nuclear reactions. It involves the fusion of two atomic nuclei to form a heavier nucleus, releasing a large amount of energy in the process.

Has cold fusion been proven to be a fact or fiction?

There is currently no scientific evidence to support the existence of cold fusion. Multiple studies have failed to replicate the original claims of cold fusion, and the scientific community remains skeptical of its existence.

What were the original claims of cold fusion?

In 1989, two scientists, Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons, claimed to have achieved cold fusion in a laboratory setting. They reported that their experiment produced excess heat and nuclear reactions at room temperature, without the need for extreme heat or pressure.

What were the criticisms of the original cold fusion experiment?

The original cold fusion experiment was heavily criticized for its lack of reproducibility and the absence of any measurable neutron or gamma ray emissions, which would be expected in a nuclear reaction. Additionally, the experiment lacked proper controls and monitoring, making it difficult to draw any conclusions from the results.

Is research on cold fusion still ongoing?

While the original claims of cold fusion have been largely discredited, there are still some researchers who continue to study the phenomenon. However, it is not considered a mainstream area of research and is often met with skepticism and criticism.

Similar threads

  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
18
Views
7K
Replies
30
Views
18K
  • Nuclear Engineering
2
Replies
66
Views
14K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
2
Replies
53
Views
9K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
2
Replies
38
Views
8K
Back
Top