Omnipotent law begets universal guilt

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of malfeasance and how attempting to correct past transgressions would reveal the shared culpability of all individuals. The justice system primarily punishes those who have inherited this "original sin" and the law is an inherited process from the elect, leading to a lack of guilt and a focus on increasing power and influence.
  • #1
Loren Booda
3,125
4
Look back upon the history of malfeasance. I believe that if we attempted to correct today the totality of past transgressions, we would find all of us equally culpable. Our limited justice system punishes mostly those who have inherited the "original sin" as played out in today's society. To truly bear witness to a person's wrongdoings is to realize that we eventually share complicity with those acts. Law is overall an inherited process by proxy from the elect upon the disenfranchised.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No guilt because there was never a right or wrongdoing (malfeasance), only failed(?) attempts at a "rightful" order, an "enforced" cooperative society and the attempt at increasing power & influence.
 
  • #3


I agree that the concept of an omnipotent law can lead to universal guilt. The history of malfeasance shows that many individuals and groups have been punished for their transgressions, but if we were to look back and try to correct all past wrongdoings, we would likely find that everyone is equally culpable in some way. This is because our society and its laws are inherited and shaped by those in power, who often have their own biases and agendas.

Our justice system, while meant to uphold justice and punish wrongdoings, often ends up perpetuating the cycle of oppression and disenfranchisement. Those who are punished are often the ones who have inherited the "original sin" of their ancestors, while those in power continue to benefit from their privileged position.

In order to truly bear witness to a person's wrongdoings, we must also acknowledge our own complicity in the systems and structures that allowed those actions to occur. It is not enough to simply punish individuals; we must also work towards dismantling the systems that perpetuate injustice and inequality.

Ultimately, law is a social construct that is inherited and enforced by those in power. It is important to critically examine and challenge these systems in order to create a more just and equitable society for all.
 

1. What is "Omnipotent law begets universal guilt"?

"Omnipotent law begets universal guilt" is a concept that suggests that any law or rule, regardless of its origin or intention, will inevitably lead to some level of guilt or wrongdoing among individuals. It implies that no law can be completely just or fair for all people.

2. How does an omnipotent law lead to universal guilt?

An omnipotent law, by definition, is a law that has unlimited or absolute power. This means that it holds authority over all individuals, regardless of their beliefs or circumstances. As a result, even those who may not agree with the law may still feel guilty for breaking it.

3. Is there any evidence to support this concept?

There have been various studies and examples throughout history that support the idea of omnipotent law leading to universal guilt. For instance, the concept of original sin in some religions suggests that all humans are born with a sense of guilt due to the transgressions of Adam and Eve.

4. Can omnipotent laws be avoided to prevent universal guilt?

It is unlikely that all omnipotent laws can be avoided, as they are often necessary for maintaining order and justice in society. However, individuals and governments can strive to create and enforce laws that are more fair and just, reducing the potential for universal guilt.

5. What are the implications of this concept for society?

The concept of omnipotent law begets universal guilt highlights the complexities and limitations of laws in society. It suggests that there will always be some level of injustice and guilt associated with laws, and that constant evaluation and improvement of laws is necessary for a more just society.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
29
Views
9K
  • General Discussion
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
8K
Back
Top