3-regular (cubic) graphs with a bridge

In summary, it is impossible to 3-edge color a cubic graph with a bridge, as it would require at least four colors, contradicting the definition of a 3-edge coloring.
  • #1
math8
160
0
How can you prove that a cubic graph with a bridge cannot be 3-edge colored?

I guess one could try a proof by contradiction, so we assume a 3 edge coloring is possible for such a graph. But then I am not sure in which direction to continue. I have tried to draw such graphs, and clearly, they can't be 3 edge-colored. But a more formal proof would be helpful.
Or maybe a proof by contrapositive, so let say we have a cubic graph with a 3-edge coloring. How do we show this graph is bridgeless?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


I would approach this problem by first defining the terms and concepts involved. A cubic graph is a graph where every vertex has exactly three edges connected to it. A bridge is an edge in a graph that, if removed, would disconnect the graph into two or more components. Edge coloring is the assignment of colors to the edges of a graph such that no two adjacent edges have the same color.

Next, I would consider the properties of a cubic graph with a bridge. Since a bridge is an edge that, when removed, disconnects the graph, it follows that a cubic graph with a bridge must have at least two components. This means that there must be at least two vertices of degree one in the graph. However, in a 3-edge coloring, each vertex must have exactly three edges of different colors connected to it. Therefore, it is impossible for a vertex of degree one to have three different colored edges connected to it, as it would require at least four different colors.

This leads us to the conclusion that a cubic graph with a bridge cannot be 3-edge colored. If it were possible, it would require at least four colors, contradicting the definition of a 3-edge coloring. This is a proof by contradiction.

Alternatively, we could use a proof by contrapositive. We start with the assumption that a cubic graph can be 3-edge colored. This means that each vertex has exactly three edges of different colors connected to it. But if a graph has a bridge, it must have at least two components, and as we have established, at least one of these components must have a vertex of degree one. This vertex cannot have three different colored edges connected to it, as it would require at least four colors. Therefore, a cubic graph with a 3-edge coloring must be bridgeless.

In conclusion, both proof techniques lead us to the same result: a cubic graph with a bridge cannot be 3-edge colored. This is because a bridge would require at least two components, and at least one of these components would have a vertex of degree one, which is incompatible with a 3-edge coloring.
 

1. What is a "3-regular graph with a bridge"?

A 3-regular graph with a bridge is a type of graph where every vertex has exactly three edges and there is at least one edge that, if removed, would disconnect the graph into two separate components.

2. How is a "bridge" defined in a 3-regular graph?

A bridge in a 3-regular graph is an edge that, if removed, would disconnect the graph into two separate components. It is also known as an "articulation edge" or a "cut-edge".

3. What is the significance of a 3-regular graph with a bridge?

3-regular graphs with a bridge have many real-world applications, such as in transportation networks, social networks, and chemical structures. They are also studied in graph theory as they have interesting properties and can be used to solve complex problems.

4. Can a 3-regular graph have more than one bridge?

Yes, a 3-regular graph can have multiple bridges. However, the number of bridges in a 3-regular graph is always an even number.

5. How can a 3-regular graph with a bridge be represented mathematically?

A 3-regular graph with a bridge can be represented using a mathematical notation called a "bridge graph", which is denoted by B(n), where n is the number of vertices in the graph. For example, B(5) represents a 3-regular graph with 5 vertices and at least one bridge.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
11
Views
479
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
49
Views
1K
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
2
Views
253
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top