What is meant by standard error for linear and quaratic coefficients ?

In summary, the standard error for linear and quadratic coefficients refers to the uncertainty or variability in the estimated coefficients from sample data. This is because each set of data will result in a different coefficient estimate, making the coefficient a random variable. One way to estimate the standard error is by assuming a probability model for the data and generating random values for the coefficient. Another method is to linearize the problem and make certain assumptions, allowing the variance of the coefficient to be expressed as a linear function of the variances of the quantities involved in the data. This can then be used to estimate the standard error. For further reading on the linearization approach, searching for articles on "asymptotic linearized confidence intervals" may provide more information.
  • #1
masyousaf1
28
0
Dear Fellows,

If we fit our data to a quadratic equation then What is meant by standard error for linear and quaratic coefficients ? I know that standard error is the standard deviation from the Sampling data. But for individual coefficients what is its interpretation ?

Best Wishes
Masood
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Exactly the same.
There are many quadratics that are consistent with that data - that gives a range of values for each coefficient.
The value you calculate is the average of all those values, and the uncertainty is the standard deviation.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #3
Any coefficient that is estimated from sample data is, itself, a random variable. Each set of data will give a different result. So the coefficient estimates have a mean and standard deviation.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #4
masyousaf1 said:
What is meant by standard error for linear and quaratic coefficients ?

That's a good question. If you fit a polynomial function to data using least squares then you get a single value for each coefficient. From a single value, how can we estimate a standard error for the coefficient ?

You can imagine that your data is generated from some probability model. If you ran the model many times, you'd get many different sets of data. If you fit a polynomial equation to each data set then you'd get different values for coefficients. That explains the concept that a coefficient is a random variable. If you happen to have a probability model for the data, it explains how you could generate random values for a coefficient and estimate its standard error from them.

Another method is to make enough assumptions to linearize the problem. A coefficient for a curve fit is a function of the data. For linear and quadratic curve fits, its a function simple enough to write down. Write a linear approximation of this function and assume this is accurate enough. Assume the population means of the quantities involved in the linear approximation are equal to the means in the sample. Assume the variances of the quantities involved in the data are equal to the variances that are estimated from the sample. Since we have expressed the coefficient as a linear function of the data, we can express the variance of the coefficient as a linear function of the variances of the quantities involved in the data, provided we assume they are independent random variables. After we estimate the variance of the coefficient, we can take the square root of the variance as an estimate of the standard error.

Does anyone know of an article that explains the linearization approach in simple manner? If you look for articles on "asymptotic linearized confidence intervals", you can find theoretical treatments.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #5


Standard error for linear and quadratic coefficients refers to the measure of the variability or uncertainty in the estimated coefficients for a linear or quadratic regression model. It is calculated as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the estimated coefficients. This means that it measures how much the estimated coefficients may vary from the true values in different samples of the same size. In other words, it gives an indication of how accurate or precise our estimates of the coefficients are. A smaller standard error indicates a more precise estimate, while a larger standard error indicates a less precise estimate. In general, a smaller standard error is desirable as it means that our estimates are closer to the true values.
 

1. What is the definition of standard error for linear and quadratic coefficients?

The standard error for linear and quadratic coefficients is a measure of the variability or uncertainty associated with the estimated values of these coefficients in a regression model. It represents the average distance that the estimated coefficient values are from the true values.

2. How is standard error calculated for linear and quadratic coefficients?

The standard error for linear and quadratic coefficients is calculated by taking the square root of the mean squared error (MSE) for the regression model. The MSE is the sum of squared residuals divided by the degrees of freedom.

3. Why is it important to consider standard error for linear and quadratic coefficients?

Standard error is important because it allows us to assess the precision of the estimated coefficient values in a regression model. It helps us determine how much confidence we can have in the relationship between the independent and dependent variables.

4. How does standard error differ from standard deviation?

Standard error and standard deviation are both measures of variability, but they have different purposes. Standard deviation measures the spread of data around the mean, while standard error measures the spread of the estimated coefficient values around the true values. Standard error is also typically smaller than standard deviation because it is based on a sample rather than the entire population.

5. Can standard error be used to make inferences about the population?

Yes, standard error can be used to make inferences about the population. It allows us to estimate the range of values within which the true population coefficient values are likely to fall. This is important because we typically have a sample of data rather than the entire population, and we want to make inferences about the population based on this sample.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
912
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
7
Views
464
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
828
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
21
Views
2K
Back
Top