The Origin of the term 'fossil' fuels

In summary: Fossil fuel derives from dead plant and animal life, which is why they're technically called fossils.
  • #1
G-Snake
2
0
This is a random question and I'm not scientifically oriented (which is obviously why I'm posting here).

If the origin of 'fossil' fuels as we know them came from the leftovers of biological species, why is 'fossil' fuel not called 'tree' fuel?

Sure it sounds stupid, but there have been trees, plants, and vegetation on the Earth probably much longer (or equally as long) as most animal/insect lifeforms. Not only that, but generally speaking (and before humanity shat all over the planet) trees and vegetation covered nearly everything. I would imagine there have been A LOT more trees and vegetation that has grown/died throughout the Earth's history than any kind of biological life form.

I'm not questioning the concept of biotic oil origins, I'm merely curious as to why they're called 'fossil' fuels. As for the theory of abiotic oil origins, while I'm skeptical of it, I'd be interested in knowing more about any results found.

Thanks in advance.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #2
Here is a good link.

http://www.scienceonline.co.uk/energy/nonrenewable.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
Thanks for the information.

Hopefully humanity can progress past the age of oil. Is oil convenient and practical today? Absolutely. Is there any reason we shouldn't strive to maximize the use of renewable energy sources? Absolutely not.

Wishful thinking on my part, it's just a bit bothersome to me of what is done in the interest of oil. But what do I know, I don't even understand the process of oil :P
 
  • #4
Google abiotic oil. Lot of strange information out there but the Russians claim worthwhile recovery.
 
  • #5
When there is literally no more oil left to drill on the planet, I wonder what humanity will be inevitably do to choose an alternate energy source.

Oil company CEO's and executives, are going to milk oil as long as physically possible to greedily line their own pockets with Billions of dollars at the expense of the environment and people's health. When oil does eventually run out, there will probably be another world war or something.
 
  • #6
Oil company CEO's and executives, are going to milk oil as long as physically possible to greedily line their own pockets with Billions of dollars at the expense of the environment and people's health. When oil does eventually run out, there will probably be another world war or something.
You have some very contorted view of economics, Absolute. The reason why corporations extract and refine oil for us is because it is the most efficient way of increasing quality of life. This is something we are willing to give them a lot of money for.
 
  • #7
G-Snake said:
This is a random question and I'm not scientifically oriented (which is obviously why I'm posting here).

If the origin of 'fossil' fuels as we know them came from the leftovers of biological species, why is 'fossil' fuel not called 'tree' fuel?
I think the name 'fossil fuel' stuck because it was a neat alliteration. Technically it is not fossilised, that is a different process. The two major groups of fossil fuels currently extracted, the one roughly being coal and the other gas and oil [although gas can come from coal], in terms of there sources. Coal tends to be the remains of terrestrial vegitation that did not decompose (parhaps because it lay in anoxic swamps) while coal and gas tend to have come from large sources of biotic matter in water that have come to rest on anoxic sea\ lake beds without fully decomposing and have subsiquently been buried under layers of sedimentary deposits. To become oil and gas they have to eventualy be burried deep into the earth, deep enough for the heating to break down the hydrocarbons into shorter chained ones that become liquids (crude oil).
 
  • #8
Richard111 said:
Google abiotic oil. Lot of strange information out there but the Russians claim worthwhile recovery.
Aboitic oil is utter pseudoscience.

We know how oil is formed, and rocks don't do it.

Besides, all unrefined oil carries microscopic evidence of the organisms from which it was formed.
 

What is the origin of the term "fossil" fuels?

The term "fossil" fuels was first coined by German chemist and physician Georgius Agricola in 1556. He used the Latin word "fossilis" meaning "dug up" or "extracted" to describe the substances found in the earth that burned like wood or coal.

Why are these fuels called "fossil" fuels?

These fuels are called "fossil" fuels because they are formed from the remains of dead plants and animals that have been buried and subjected to high temperatures and pressure over millions of years. The process of decomposition and compression transforms these organic materials into the fuels we use today.

When were fossil fuels first used by humans?

Fossil fuels have been used by humans for thousands of years. Coal was likely the first fossil fuel used, with evidence of its use dating back to ancient China and Rome. Oil was also used by ancient civilizations, mainly for medicinal and religious purposes. However, it was not until the Industrial Revolution in the 18th century that fossil fuels were widely used for energy production.

What are the three main types of fossil fuels?

The three main types of fossil fuels are coal, oil, and natural gas. Coal is a solid fuel formed from the remains of plants, oil is a liquid fuel formed from the remains of microscopic plants and animals, and natural gas is a gaseous fuel also formed from the remains of plants and animals.

How are fossil fuels extracted and processed?

Fossil fuels are extracted through various methods such as drilling, mining, and hydraulic fracturing. Once extracted, they are transported to processing plants where they undergo purification and refinement processes to be turned into usable fuels. However, these processes can have negative impacts on the environment, such as air and water pollution, and contribute to climate change.

Similar threads

  • Earth Sciences
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
3
Replies
87
Views
4K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
59
Views
9K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
28
Views
12K
Back
Top