Register to reply

Frictional Force Equation Doesn't Make Sense

by FredericChopin
Tags: equation, force, frictional, sense
Share this thread:
FredericChopin
#1
May19-13, 12:09 AM
P: 57
Frictional Force is mathematically defined as:

Ff = μ*m*g*cos(θ)

, where μ is the coefficient of friction, m is the mass of the object, g is the acceleration due to gravity and θ is the angle of the inclined plane.

But in terms of direction, this makes no sense!

Suppose there is an object on an inclined plane. It is going to travel down the plane because its Weight Force is pulling it towards the Earth. At the same time, a Frictional Force will act in the opposite direction to the motion of the object.

The Frictional Force, however, is calculated using the object's Normal Force times cos(θ) (times μ), which acts perpendicular to the surface of the plane. But this means that the Normal Force is not acting in the same axis as the Frictional Force, so how can Normal Force times cos(θ) (times μ) be used to calculate Frictional Force?

Let me elaborate: In order to calculate Normal Force in the same axis as Frictional Force, you should use μ*m*g*sin(θ), not μ*m*g*cos(θ). Would it not make more sense this way?

I'm either very frustrated or very confused. Maybe a diagram with your answer can help.

Thank you.
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Mapping the optimal route between two quantum states
Spin-based electronics: New material successfully tested
Verifying the future of quantum computing
jedishrfu
#2
May19-13, 12:16 AM
P: 2,810
But it makes sense if you think that you're breaking up the gravitational force into two components one parallel to the motion and one perpendicular to the motion. Its the perpendicular component magnitude that dictates the friction not its direction.

It makes sense if you consider motion on a horizontal plane vs motion on an incline of say 45 degree vs motion sliding down a vertical plane. In the first case its the full weight of the object(cos(0)*weight vs cos(45)*weight vs cos(90)* weight (or zero frictional force).
WannabeNewton
#3
May19-13, 12:21 AM
C. Spirit
Sci Advisor
Thanks
WannabeNewton's Avatar
P: 5,435
The magnitude of the frictional force can be related to the magnitude of the normal force by ##f\leq \mu N##. When slipping occurs, we have ##f= \mu N##. If a block is sliding down an inclined plane of angle ##\theta## (i.e. slipping relative to the surface of the inclined plane), Newton's 2nd law gives for the motion along the plane and perpendicular to the plane, respectively, ##mg\sin\theta - f = ma## and ##mg\cos\theta - N =0 ## (I have set up my coordinates so that the x-axis is along the incline and the y-axis is perpendicular to the incline). We can then easily find an expression for the magnitude of friction ##f## and we find that ##f = \mu mg\cos\theta##. In summary, we are relating the magnitudes of the normal force to the frictional force, not their directions! The direction of ##f## is of course along the incline.

FredericChopin
#4
May19-13, 12:47 AM
P: 57
Frictional Force Equation Doesn't Make Sense

Thank you jedishrfu and WannabeNewton; that cleared a lot of things up. But this leaves a different question.

Why is Normal Force proportional to Frictional Force? In other words:

"...we find that f=μmgcosθ...".

, but why?

I think this would require more of an explanation than an equation.
WannabeNewton
#5
May19-13, 01:04 AM
C. Spirit
Sci Advisor
Thanks
WannabeNewton's Avatar
P: 5,435
I belive you are asking for a justification of why ##f\leq \mu N## holds true for sliding friction. Keep in mind that it is an approximate model of sliding friction and is known as Coulomb friction; it is justified via experiment. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frictio...f_dry_friction
jedishrfu
#6
May19-13, 01:08 AM
P: 2,810
Quote Quote by WannabeNewton View Post
I belive you are asking for a justification of why ##f\leq \mu N## holds true for sliding friction. Keep in mind that it is an approximate model of sliding friction and is known as Coulomb friction; it is justified via experiment. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frictio...f_dry_friction
Good point, there is also an initial frictional force that must be overcome to start something sliding that is higher than the sliding frictional force.
FredericChopin
#7
May19-13, 01:17 AM
P: 57
Brilliant. Thank you guys.
SammyS
#8
May19-13, 01:24 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 7,801
Quote Quote by FredericChopin View Post
Thank you jedishrfu and WannabeNewton; that cleared a lot of things up. But this leaves a different question.

Why is Normal Force proportional to Frictional Force? In other words:

"...we find that f=μmgcosθ...".

, but why?

I think this would require more of an explanation than an equation.
Considering "Cause and Effect", I would express that as the magnitude of the Frictional Force is directly proportional to the magnitude of the Normal Force. The resulting equation is the same, but in my view it's the amount of the Normal Force which produces the force of friction.
Chestermiller
#9
May19-13, 09:06 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
Chestermiller's Avatar
P: 5,062
Quote Quote by FredericChopin View Post
Frictional Force is mathematically defined as:

Ff = μ*m*g*cos(θ)

, where μ is the coefficient of friction, m is the mass of the object, g is the acceleration due to gravity and θ is the angle of the inclined plane.

But in terms of direction, this makes no sense!

Suppose there is an object on an inclined plane. It is going to travel down the plane because its Weight Force is pulling it towards the Earth. At the same time, a Frictional Force will act in the opposite direction to the motion of the object.

The Frictional Force, however, is calculated using the object's Normal Force times cos(θ) (times μ), which acts perpendicular to the surface of the plane. But this means that the Normal Force is not acting in the same axis as the Frictional Force, so how can Normal Force times cos(θ) (times μ) be used to calculate Frictional Force?

Let me elaborate: In order to calculate Normal Force in the same axis as Frictional Force, you should use μ*m*g*sin(θ), not μ*m*g*cos(θ). Would it not make more sense this way?

I'm either very frustrated or very confused. Maybe a diagram with your answer can help.

Thank you.
You are confused because μ*m*g*cos(θ) is not the frictional force. It represents the maximum frictional force that can be sustained without the block beginning to slide down the plane. The block will begin to slide when the angle is just large enough for mg sin(θ) to equal μ*m*g*cos(θ). Otherwise, the frictional force will be less than μ*m*g*cos(θ), and the block will not slide.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
It doesn't make sense to get negative Precalculus Mathematics Homework 4
This solution doesn't make sense to me (Probability) Calculus & Beyond Homework 3
Can someone tell me why this doesn't make sense? Beyond the Standard Model 3
Gravity Doesn't Make Any Sense... General Physics 7
It doesn't make sense Special & General Relativity 3