| New Reply |
Positive/Negative Symbol Confusion |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Jul15-12, 07:39 PM | #1 |
|
|
Positive/Negative Symbol Confusion
So since we know that electrons are flowing in a relatively less negative (relative positive) direction why does + indicate source? Surely the electrons are flowing towards the + and not from it.
|
| Jul15-12, 07:44 PM | #2 |
|
|
Conventions in electronics were set before anyone understood electrons. Get used to it.
|
| Jul15-12, 07:55 PM | #3 |
|
|
Could do with fixing then.
|
| Jul15-12, 07:58 PM | #4 |
|
|
Positive/Negative Symbol Confusion |
| Jul15-12, 08:10 PM | #5 |
|
|
I suggest forward progress should include revision as well as innovation. If you think changing symbols on electronics is too lofty a goal perhaps you could focus on something more manageable like doing the laundry and/or taking out the trash.
|
| Jul15-12, 09:11 PM | #6 |
|
|
Mearvk,
Keep it civil man. phinds is a very knowledgeable and helpful fellow. |
| Jul15-12, 09:20 PM | #7 |
Recognitions:
|
Your assumption that "current = a flow of electrons" is often wrong. It happens to be right in metals, but it's wrong for many electronic components (not only for semicondictors, but also electrolytic capacitors, batteries, CFL lamps, etc, etc).
It is also wrong for most "natural" current flows in the earth, its atmosphere, water, living organisms, etc. So your idea that swapping "+" and "-" somehow fixes a problem doesn't work too well. |
| Jul15-12, 09:20 PM | #8 |
|
|
You guys are very close to be labeled damaged goods. If you want to throw around morality start with the guy you're protecting. I'm tired of passive-aggression in all its forms and those stupid enough to protect it. I have the right to stand up for myself and just because he isn't being ugly in an overt way does not make it any less ugly. Grow up the both of you.
|
| Jul15-12, 09:29 PM | #9 |
|
|
|
| Jul16-12, 12:34 AM | #10 |
|
|
The rules of these forums state that explanations should be in line with accepted knowledge. Most of this is backed up in countless text books.
There is nothing 'wrong' with the way + and - is used. It is a convention. First of all you should check text books for an explanation. |
| Jul16-12, 02:28 AM | #11 |
|
|
You can also check out this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electri...nt#Conventions |
| Jul16-12, 06:26 AM | #12 |
|
|
If you really think that the reason for not changing is just that Scientists are brainless and conservative then you have a lot to learn. Just because you are confused, don't assume that 'we' are all wrong. |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Positive/Negative Symbol Confusion
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Negative times negative is positive? | General Math | 6 | ||
| why negative times negative is positive | General Math | 7 | ||
| Component vectors positive or negative and angles positive or negative | Introductory Physics Homework | 5 | ||
| why a negative times a negative is positive | General Math | 0 | ||
| passive sign convention (negative watts, and negative current confusion) | Advanced Physics Homework | 7 | ||