Rotational Kinetic Energy of a Non-Symmetrical Fixed Top

In summary, the conversation discusses the analysis of a pendulum's motion, specifically whether or not it will exhibit simple harmonic oscillation and how to determine its period. The idea of considering the pendulum's moment of inertia is suggested and the formula for the frequency of simple harmonic motion is derived from the Lagrangian. The concept of a massless string for a pendulum is also discussed, with the conclusion that it is a simplifying assumption but not necessary for the pendulum to exhibit simple harmonic motion. The conversation also touches on the more general case of a non-symmetric pendulum, where the motion needs to be decomposed into rotation around each of the three principal axes of inertia.
  • #1
Ezio3.1415
159
1
Trust me this is not homework... My last two questions were removed cause they looked like homework... I understand its the forum policy... From now on I will post the 'seemingly homework' on the homework sections...

Suppose,there's a rod of mass m1 hanging from a point... And a mass m2 is attached to the other end... If I let it oscillate will it present a simple harmonic oscillation... If it does,what will be the period...

My intuition said no...(well the pendulum's string always has to be mass less)
But when I thought mathematically, what's the difference if I find the center of mass of (m1+m2) & solve it... That would only change the L... And I can find the differential equation
by τ=Iα... thinking the center of the mass of m1+m2 acts at a distance L... and I would find the moment of inertia of the system of m1+m2... so what do u think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Your idea to think about the moment of inertia of the pendulum is a good one. The rotational kinetic energy of a cylindrically symmetric object rotating around an axis through its end is ##K=\frac{1}{2}I\omega^2 = \frac{1}{2}I\dot{\phi}^2## where ##\phi## is the angle between the vertical and the pendulum's central axis (with the over dot meaning the time derivative) and I is the moment of inertia around the end. If the mass of the pendulum is ##m## and the distance from the pivot to the centre of mass is ##l##, then the gravitational potential energy of the pendulum is ##U=mgl(1-\cos\phi) \approx \frac{1}{2}mgl\phi^2## where the approximation is valid for small angles of oscillation. Thus, in the small angle approximation, we have the Lagrangian:
##L = K - U = \frac{1}{2}I\dot{\phi}^2 - \frac{1}{2}mgl\phi^2##

The universal identifier for simple harmonic motion in some coordinate is a Lagrangian which is quadratic in that coordinate and its derivative, which we have above for the ##\phi## coordinate. This comes straight from the Euler-Lagrange equations, since ##L=\frac{1}{2}(A\dot{q}^2 - Bq^2)## (for arbitrary constants A and B, with a factor of a half taken out for computational convenience) implies:
##A\frac{d^2q}{dt^2} + Bq = 0##
This is the differential equation for simple harmonic motion with frequency ##\omega = \sqrt{\frac{B}{A}}##. So, you can read off the harmonic frequency directly from the Lagrangian for the pendulum: ##\omega = \sqrt{\frac{mgl}{I}}##. This is related to the period of oscillation in the usual way.

The general case for a less symmetric pendulum follows similarly using the principle moments of inertia about the centre of mass (which you can either use to determine the moments around the end using the parallel axis theorem, or else just separate the motion into rotation about the centre of mass and the motion of centre of mass itself). This is done in the classical mechanics text by Landau and Lifshiftz in the example problem 3 of section 32, if you want more details.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Thank you for your answer... Btw, what was the period u found for this problem?
Why our simple pendulum's string always is said to be massless... It provides harmonic oscillation even if it has mass...
 
  • #4
Ezio3.1415 said:
Thank you for your answer... Btw, what was the period u found for this problem?

I told you the angular frequency, it is very easy to work out the period from that.

Ezio3.1415 said:
Why our simple pendulum's string always is said to be massless... It provides harmonic oscillation even if it has mass...

Because the analysis is simpler if the string is massless, and the approximation is close enough to work well.
 
  • #5
U used m... Are u referring to the center of mass of m1+m2 at L distance?
 
  • #6
LastOneStanding said:
If the mass of the pendulum is ##m##

I treated the general case of a pendulum of any shape, as long as it's cylindrically symmetric. For your special case, you have to work out the appropriate moment of inertia.
 
  • #7
I found
ω^2=2g(m1+m2)/l(m1+2m2)

Can u please check my calculation?
 
  • #8
LastOneStanding said:
I treated the general case of a pendulum of any shape, as long as it's cylindrically symmetric. For your special case, you have to work out the appropriate moment of inertia.

I can't see where the symmetry is necessary. The MI is whatever it is and the displacement of the CM in either sense will provide the same restoring force if the position of the pivot is not changed, won't it? Isn't that all that's necessary for SHM?
 
  • #9
Cylindrical symmetric is necessary for the specific formula I worked out, which is what the sentence you're quoting is referring to. You're right that there is still SHM in the non-symmetric case—the reference I gave works that out explicitly. The point is that in the general case, the motion of the body needs to be decomposed into rotation around each of the three principal axes of inertia and so rotational kinetic energy has three terms. So, the formula I gave needs to be replaced with something more general (given in L&L) to get the angular frequency of a non-symmetric pendulum.
 
  • #10
I was thinking in terms of a two dimensional object swinging around one axis - which is a 'trivial' case, I guess. Anything more would get a lot harder. If you had a three dimensional object hanging from a universal bearing then it could have different MIs about different axes and it could also be spinning about another axis. Could you not, still, break this down into three motions, though - two with a restoring force towards the vertical (giving two different periods) and one rotation at a constant rate around an axis between the pivot and the CM? Perhaps there's something more.
 
  • #11
sophiecentaur said:
If you had a three dimensional object hanging from a universal bearing then it could have different MIs about different axes and it could also be spinning about another axis.

The case I was describing is not a pendulum attached to a free bearing. It's still attached on a fixed axis, which will, in general, be at some angle to each of the principal axes of inertia. If the pivoting axis is at an angle of ##\alpha##, ##\beta##, and ##\gamma## to the principal axes, about which moments of inertia are ##I_1##, ##I_2##, and ##I_3## (through the centre of mass), then the rotational kinetic energy is ##K = \frac{1}{2}I_1\omega^2 \cos\alpha+ \frac{1}{2}I_2\omega^2\cos\beta + \frac{1}{2}I_3\omega^2\cos\gamma##. There is an additional contribution to the kinetic energy from the centre of mass motion (since the principal moments of inertia are taken through the CM, not the pivot point), and the potential energy stays the same. Without looking into it more deeply, it sounds like your idea for how to treat the free bearing case would work, but some of the details sound very messy. As I recall from classical mechanics, a symmetrical top fixed by a bearing to a table top has a fairly complicated description. A non-symmetrical fixed top might be intractable—but classical mechanics was a long time ago...
 

1. What is simple harmonic oscillation?

Simple harmonic oscillation is a type of periodic motion where an object or system vibrates back and forth around a stable equilibrium point, following a sinusoidal pattern. It occurs when a restoring force is proportional to the displacement of the object from its equilibrium position.

2. What is the equation for simple harmonic oscillation?

The equation for simple harmonic oscillation is x = A*sin(ωt + φ), where x is the displacement of the object, A is the amplitude, ω is the angular frequency, and φ is the phase angle.

3. What is the difference between simple harmonic motion and periodic motion?

Simple harmonic motion is a specific type of periodic motion where the restoring force is directly proportional to the displacement, while periodic motion can refer to any type of motion that repeats itself over a fixed period of time.

4. What are some real-life examples of simple harmonic oscillation?

Some examples of simple harmonic oscillation include the motion of a swinging pendulum, a mass-spring system, the vibration of guitar strings, and the motion of a bobblehead toy.

5. How is frequency related to simple harmonic oscillation?

The frequency of simple harmonic oscillation is equal to the angular frequency divided by 2π, or f = ω/2π. This means that the higher the frequency, the faster the object or system is oscillating back and forth.

Similar threads

  • Classical Physics
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
960
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
579
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
2K
Back
Top