Energy problem - Chain on low friction surface.

In summary: This result is independent of the force being constant. It is always true that the work done by an external force that moves the center of mass of a system of particles is the product of the force times the distance the CM moves. In summary, the problem involves a chain of total mass M = 5kg that is coiled into a tight ball on a low friction floor. A constant horizontal force F = 20 N is applied to one end of the chain, causing it to stretch to its full length of L = 3m. The final velocity of the chain can be calculated by considering the energy principles and the change in momentum of the system in a small amount of time. The problem can also be solved by treating the
  • #1
sixstringartist
10
0

Homework Statement


Consider a chain of total mass M = 5kg that is coiled into a tight ball on a low friction floor(like an ideal ice rink). You pull on a link at one end with a constant horizontal force F=20 N, just until it reaches its full length L = 3 m. What is the final velocity of the chain? (Hint: consider the point particle system. Make reasonable assumptions, like treating the coiled ball as if it has negligible size.)


Homework Equations


Im pretty sure this involved the Energy Principle so delta_E = Wext + Q

the enlongated chain is 3 meters, with the center of mass having moved 1.5 m

I wish I had more to go on, but I just need a bump in the right direction.


The Attempt at a Solution



ah, well that's kindof in section 2. although its only a feable attempt to solve it, its as far as I can get right now.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If the chain were stretched out, energy principles would work fine, but how are you going to find Q in this problem? (Although the equation you wrote is not quite what you would need here.) I think you will do better looking at the change in momentum of the system in some small amount of time Δt. There are two contributions to this change. One contribution is the gradual change in velocity of the mass that is already moving. The other is the abrupt change in velocity of the next little piece of the chain of mass Δm from zero to the current velocity of the moving part of the chain.

You could look at the motion of the center of mass, but although it is relatively easy to find the position of the center of mass as a function of the postion of the end of the chain, it is not quite so easy to find it as a function of time. There is the derivative chain rule that could help if you choose this approach.
 
  • #3
Thank you for your reply. Here we are to consider the ball of chain as a point mass.

W = F *d (here) so W = 20(1.5) = 30 J

Im guessing that the Energy when enlongated is nearly all kinetic so
30 = 1/2 m v^2 = (.5)(5)(v^2)

v^2 = 12

v ~ 3.46 m/s

Which is the correct answer. Thanks for the help!
 
  • #4
sixstringartist said:
Thank you for your reply. Here we are to consider the ball of chain as a point mass.

W = F *d (here) so W = 20(1.5) = 30 J

Im guessing that the Energy when enlongated is nearly all kinetic so
30 = 1/2 m v^2 = (.5)(5)(v^2)

v^2 = 12

v ~ 3.46 m/s

Which is the correct answer. Thanks for the help!

It is not a point mass if part of the chain starts to move before all of it moves. If you were treating it as a point mass, all parts of the chain would have the same speed at all times.

How do you justify W = 20N(1.5m)? The point where you apply the force moves 3m, not 1.5m. The work you would have to do while applying this force is twice what you calculated. Where did the energy go?
 
  • #5
This problem was discussed in lecture and I think was a poor problem. The way I did it was how it was intended. But you are correct in the apparent loss of energy which was due to friction?!? Thats what the prof said... then he discussed how the microscopic model of friction where "peaks" slide across each other, resulting in a shorter distance. Thats what I got from the explanation but it doesn't all make sense to me.
 
  • #6
sixstringartist said:
This problem was discussed in lecture and I think was a poor problem. The way I did it was how it was intended. But you are correct in the apparent loss of energy which was due to friction?!? Thats what the prof said... then he discussed how the microscopic model of friction where "peaks" slide across each other, resulting in a shorter distance. Thats what I got from the explanation but it doesn't all make sense to me.

There was no friction included in the problem. It was done as if the floor were perfectly frictionless. What you have in this problem can be considered to be a series of inelastic collisions between mass in motion and mass at rest. Each time a bit of mass dm starts to move, the momentum change of the system is exactly equivalent to an inelastic collision between that bit of mass (dm) initially at rest and the part of the chain already in motion while accelerataing under the action of the applied force. Energy is not conserved in this process. A lot of the work done gets converted into thermal energy of the chain.

A justification for your calculation follows:

x is the position of the end of the chain where F is applied, with x = 0 at the coiled end. When an external force is applied to a system of particles, the CM of the system accelerates obeying Newton's second law.

[tex] x_{CM} = \frac{1}{M}\frac{x}{2}\frac{{Mx}}{L} = \frac{{x^2 }}{{2L}} [/tex]

but that is not explicitly needed to do the problem

[tex] F_{ext} = Ma_{CM} = M\frac{{dv_{CM} }}{{dt}} = M\frac{{dv_{CM} }}{{dx_{CM} }}\frac{{dx_{CM} }}{{dt}} = Mv_{CM} \frac{{dv_{CM} }}{{dx_{CM} }} [/tex]

where the chain rule has been used so the variables can be separated as follows

[tex] F_{ext} dx_{CM} = Mv_{CM} dv_{CM} [/tex]

[tex] F_{ext} \int_0^{L/2} {dx_{CM} } = M\int_0^V {v_{CM} dv_{CM} } [/tex]

[tex] F_{ext} \frac{L}{2} = M\frac{{V^2 }}{2} [/tex]

[tex] F_{ext} L = MV^2 [/tex]

The work done is twice the final kinetic energy of the chain.
 
Last edited:

1. What is the "Energy problem" in relation to a chain on a low friction surface?

The "Energy problem" refers to the phenomenon where a chain, or any other object, continues to move on a low friction surface even after the force that was initially applied to it has been removed. This is due to the conservation of energy, where the potential energy of the chain is converted into kinetic energy and the chain continues to move until it runs out of energy.

2. Why does a chain on a low friction surface continue to move on its own?

A chain on a low friction surface continues to move due to the principle of inertia. This principle states that an object in motion will continue to move in a straight line at a constant speed unless acted upon by an external force. In this case, the low friction surface provides minimal resistance, allowing the chain to continue moving with its original momentum.

3. How does the energy problem affect the movement of a chain on a low friction surface?

The energy problem affects the movement of a chain on a low friction surface by causing it to continue moving even after the force that was initially applied to it has been removed. This means that the chain will move further than expected and may cause problems in certain situations, such as in industrial machinery where precise movements are required.

4. Can the energy problem be solved or eliminated?

The energy problem cannot be completely solved or eliminated, as it is a fundamental principle of physics. However, it can be managed and mitigated through the use of different materials and surface coatings that provide more friction, or by implementing control mechanisms to stop the chain's movement after a specific distance or time.

5. What are some potential applications of the energy problem in chain movement on low friction surfaces?

The energy problem in chain movement on low friction surfaces has several potential applications, such as in the design and operation of conveyor belts, roller coasters, and other machinery that require controlled and precise movements. It can also be studied and utilized in the development of energy-efficient transportation systems and renewable energy technologies.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
4
Replies
114
Views
14K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
5K
Back
Top