Mesh-Current\;Method:\;Power\;Dissipation\;in\;20\;Ohm\;Resistor[/tex]

  • Thread starter Luke1294
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Method
In summary, the mesh-current method was used to find the power dissipated in the 20 ohm resistor. After setting up the equations for each current and solving for I1, I2, and I3, there was a discrepancy in the final answer. Upon reviewing the equations, it was discovered that there was a typo in the second equation and a misunderstanding of the polarity of the resistors. The correct values for I1, I2, and I3 were -87.75, 92.8125, and 67.5, respectively. However, when summing I1 and I2 to find the total current, the resulting answer of 5.0625 did not match the expected value of 259.
  • #1
Luke1294
57
0

Homework Statement



Use the mesh-current method to find the power dissipated in the 20 ohm resistor

prob73.jpg

Homework Equations



[tex]p=vi^2[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Looking at the picture above, you can see how I set my current flows, in hopes of making the most currents flow together. If the picture isn't entirely clear, voltage supplied at the far left of the circuit is dependent upon the current flowing from left to right on the 3 ohm resistor. I'm assuming I have some major sign-error issues and that's what's keeping me from the correct answer, provided to be 259.2 W.

My equations-

Current 1-
[tex] 135 + 2I_1 +20(I_1+I_2) + 3(I_1+I_2) = 0[/tex]
[tex] 25I_1 + 20I_2 + 3I_3 = -135 [/tex]

Current 2-

[tex] 10i_0 + I_2 + 20(I_2+I_1) - 4(I_2-I_3) = 0[/tex]
[tex] I_1+I_3 = i_0 [/tex]
[tex] 10(I_1 + I_2) + 20(I_2+I_1) - 4(I_2-I_3) = 0 [/tex]
[tex] 30I_1 + 17I_2 +14I_3 = 0 [/tex]

Current 3-

[tex]5I_3 + 4(I_3 - I_2) + 3(I_1+I_3) = 0 [/tex]
[tex]5I_1 - 4I_2 + 12I_3 = 0[/tex]

Okay, so I throw everything into a matrix, solve, for I1, I2, and I3. I got some very funky answers, so I know SOMETHING is wrong based on that... I got

[tex]I_1 = \frac{35100}{373}
I_2 = \frac{-42930}{373}
I_3 = \frac{-23085}{373} [/tex]

So to find the actual current going through the 20 ohm resistor, I would sum I1 and I2. I wind up with -7830/373...When I plug that value into my power equation, I get 8813.245, a far cry from the expected value.

Any pointers?[tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Luke1294 said:

Homework Statement



Use the mesh-current method to find the power dissipated in the 20 ohm resistor

prob73.jpg




Homework Equations



[tex]p=vi^2[/tex]



The Attempt at a Solution



Looking at the picture above, you can see how I set my current flows, in hopes of making the most currents flow together. If the picture isn't entirely clear, voltage supplied at the far left of the circuit is dependent upon the current flowing from left to right on the 3 ohm resistor. I'm assuming I have some major sign-error issues and that's what's keeping me from the correct answer, provided to be 259.2 W.

My equations-

Current 1-
[tex] 135 + 2I_1 +20(I_1+I_2) + 3(I_1+I_2) = 0[/tex]
[tex] 25I_1 + 20I_2 + 3I_3 = 0 [/tex]

Current 2-

[tex] 10i_0 + I_2 + 20(I_2+I_1) - 4(I_2-I_3) = 0[/tex]
[tex] I_1+I_3 = i_0 [/tex]
[tex] 10(I_1 + I_2) + 20(I_2+I_1) - 4(I_2-I_3) = 0 [/tex]
[tex] 30I_1 + 17I_2 +14I_3 = 0 [/tex]

Current 3-

[tex]5I_3 + 4(I_3 - I_2) + 3(I_1+I_3) = 0 [/tex]
[tex]5I_1 - 4I_2 + 12I_3 = 0[/tex]

Okay, so I throw everything into a matrix, solve, for I1, I2, and I3. I got some very funky answers, so I know SOMETHING is wrong based on that... I got

[tex]I_1 = \frac{35100}{373}
I_2 = \frac{-42930}{373}
I_3 = \frac{-23085}{373} [/tex]

So to find the actual current going through the 20 ohm resistor, I would sum I1 and I2. I wind up with -7830/373...When I plug that value into my power equation, I get 8813.245, a far cry from the expected value.

Any pointers?

You should have:
Current 1-
[tex] 135 + 2I_1 +20(I_1+I_2) + 3(I_1+I_3) = 0[/tex]
[tex] 25I_1 + 20I_2 + 3I_3 = -135 [/tex]
I think those errors are typos.

But in the second equation:
Current 2-

[tex] 10i_0 + I_2 + 20(I_2+I_1) + 4(I_2-I_3) = 0[/tex]
[tex] I_1+I_3 = i_0 [/tex]
[tex] 10(I_1 + I_3) + 20(I_2+I_1) + 4(I_2-I_3) = 0 [/tex]
[tex] 30I_1 + 24I_2 +6I_3 = 0 [/tex]
 
  • #3
Yes, the first equation was a typo. Will correct.

Why would it be +4(I2-I3)? The current is flowing from the negative side of a resistor to the positive side...wouldn't that give it a - sign?

Even if that is incorrect, those values unfortunatly do not lead me where I need to be :(
 
  • #4
Luke1294 said:
Yes, the first equation was a typo. Will correct.

Why would it be +4(I2-I3)? The current is flowing from the negative side of a resistor to the positive side...wouldn't that give it a - sign?

Even if that is incorrect, those values unfortunatly do not lead me where I need to be :(

When you do mesh-currents on a circuit, you assume the directions of the current. Meaning you can ignore the polarity of the resistors. Don't worry, the algebra will take care of itself and show if the direction of the current is inversed (You will see a negative sign in front of it, if that is the case)

You are writing a mesh current equation from I2 side, which turns out to be 4(I2-I3), because I3 is going in the opposite direction of I2.
 
  • #5
Okay, I wasn't aware of the polarity thing. I understood the I2-I3, but the positive 4 was what threw me off. At any rate, I'm still not arriving at the correct answer.

With a matrix that looks like this...

25 20 3 | -135
30 24 6 | 0
5 -4 12 | 0

I wind up with
I1 = -87.75
I2 = 92.8125
I3 = 67.5.But to find the branch current, you have to sum I1 and I2 together, which would give me a total current of 5.0625 running through that branch. Using my power expression, p=vi^2, I'm getting 512.57 W...according to the back of the book, I'm looking for 259.2 W. Do you see any other errors in there?

Thank you guys for your help!
 
  • #6
Luke1294 said:
Okay, I wasn't aware of the polarity thing. I understood the I2-I3, but the positive 4 was what threw me off. At any rate, I'm still not arriving at the correct answer.

With a matrix that looks like this...

25 20 3 | -135
30 24 6 | 0
5 -4 12 | 0

I wind up with
I1 = -87.75
I2 = 92.8125
I3 = 67.5.


But to find the branch current, you have to sum I1 and I2 together, which would give me a total current of 5.0625 running through that branch. Using my power expression, p=vi^2, I'm getting 512.57 W...according to the back of the book, I'm looking for 259.2 W. Do you see any other errors in there?

Thank you guys for your help!

The third equation should be:
[tex]3 I_1 - 4 I_2 + 12 I_3 = 0[/tex]
and not
[tex]5 I_1 - 4 I_2 + 12 I_3 = 0[/tex]
 
  • #7
I don't know why I wrote p=vi^2..it's p=i^2r, and that is the formula I have been using all along. Even with the noted corrections, I'm still not quite where I should be...hmpf.
 
  • #8
Well, I found my error, with some help from the allaboutcircuits fourm. There are two main things- first, I have a typo in my first equation. The final term should be I3, not I2 again. The main problem, however, lies in the 2nd equation-

I went from
[tex] 10i_0 + I_2 + 20(I_2+I_1) - 4(I_2-I_3) = 0[/tex]
to
[tex] 10(I_1 + I_2) + 20(I_2+I_1) - 4(I_2-I_3) = 0 [/tex]

I totally dropped the second term from the first equation- the I2 standing alone. With that, everything checks out, I get 18/5 for the branch current, and the correct value for power dissipated. Thank you all for your help, and I am sorry that my carelessness caused so many problems.
 
  • #9
I don´t know how introducing two errors in your equation did you get the right answer. According to Kirchoff's voltage law (KVL) the sum of all voltages across the loop must be zero.
The voltage across the 4 ohm resistor is [tex]+4(I_2 - I_3)[/tex] and you cannot drop the voltage across the 1 ohm resistor.
Your second equation should be:
[tex]30 I_1 + 25 I_2 + 6 I_3 = 0[/tex]
You should not trust unconditionally the answer given by the book and try to adjust your equations to get the "right" result.
 
  • #10
No, you misunderstand. Thats is the final equatation i arrive at. When working earlier, I had dropped the one ohm resistor term. When I realized and corrected this, I found the equation you had written, and get the correct answer. I should have been more clear.
 
  • #11
I got the book's answer using the correct equations. For
[tex]A= \left[ \begin{array}{ccc}
25 & 20 & 3 \\
30 & 25 & 6\\
3 & -4 & 12
\end{array} \right]
[/tex]

[tex] b = \left[\begin{array}{c}-135\\0\\0 \end{array} \right] [/tex]

[tex]I = A^{-1} b[/tex]
I got
[tex] I_1 = -64.8000[/tex]
[tex] I_2 = 68.4000[/tex]
[tex] I_3 = 39.0000[/tex]

[tex]I_L = I_1 + I_2 = 3.6[/tex]
[tex]p = 20 I_L^2 = 259.2[/tex]
 

1. What is the Mesh-Current Method?

The Mesh-Current Method is a technique used to analyze direct current (DC) circuits with multiple loops. It involves assigning current variables to each loop and writing equations based on Kirchhoff's voltage law to solve for the currents and voltages in the circuit.

2. How does the Mesh-Current Method work?

The Mesh-Current Method works by creating a system of equations based on Kirchhoff's voltage law for each loop in the circuit. These equations are then solved simultaneously to find the currents and voltages in the circuit.

3. What is the purpose of using the Mesh-Current Method?

The Mesh-Current Method is used to determine the currents and voltages in a circuit, which can provide valuable information about the circuit's performance. It can also be used to calculate power dissipation in specific components, such as the 20 Ohm resistor in this question.

4. How do you calculate power dissipation using the Mesh-Current Method?

To calculate power dissipation in a specific component, such as the 20 Ohm resistor, you will need to know the current flowing through the component and the voltage across it. These values can be determined using the Mesh-Current Method, and then the power dissipation can be calculated using the formula P = I^2 * R, where P is power, I is current, and R is resistance.

5. What are some limitations of the Mesh-Current Method?

The Mesh-Current Method may become more complex and time-consuming to use as the number of loops in a circuit increases. It also assumes that the circuit is in steady-state, meaning that the currents and voltages do not change over time. Additionally, the method may not work for circuits with non-linear elements, such as diodes or transistors.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top