Universe smaller than a Proton.

In summary, scientists assert that the entire universe, with its billions of galaxies and stars, as well as dark matter and dark energy, was once in a state smaller than the volume of a proton in the distant past. This conclusion is based on physical observations and evidence, such as the universe's expansion and the Olber's Paradox. While it may be possible to imagine alternative theories, the evidence strongly supports the idea of the universe starting from a very small size and expanding to its current state.
  • #1
Himanshu
67
0
How do scientists assert the daring conclusion, that is overwhelmingly impossible even to speculate about, that the entire universe that contains billions of galaxies with billions of stars in each one of them along with dark matter and dark energy that make up 95% of our universe was once in diststant past so small that is occupied a region of space that is smaller than the volume of a proton?


Now I agree that the size of the universe must have come from the calculation from the physical theories. But is there an intuitive understanding for this?
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hard as it is to conceive of the universe starting that way, the physical observations point very strongly in that direction.

All that matter and energy in the universe is flying apart at just the right speed, and coooling at just the right rate. If we switch the cosmic movie projector in reverse, and apply what we DO know about matter and energy, we see everything winding back to such a point.

The preponderance of evidence from different sources (such as Olber's Paradox, to name just one) leaves little room for other ideas about the origin of our universe.

You (i.e. you) could happily throw away all theories ever put forth and start from scratch, with only the observations. You would very likely come to the same conclusion about the origin of the universe.

It less about theories than it is about one virtually inescapable conclusion, the theories are more about refinement of the basic idea.
 
  • #3
DaveC426913 said:
Hard as it is to conceive of the universe starting that way, the physical observations point very strongly in that direction.

All that matter and energy in the universe is flying apart at just the right speed, and coooling at just the right rate. If we switch the cosmic movie projector in reverse, and apply what we DO know about matter and energy, we see everything winding back to such a point.

but from what we are observing of the universe and its expansion, and considering the scale of these observations (zillions of lightyears), couldn't it be just as plausible that all of the universe "exploded" (i know that's the wrong word for this in the Big Bang) from a space as large as a solar system, or a star, or a planet, or a basketball? how do we infer that it goes back to the Planck scale (which is a fukuva lot smaller than a proton)?
 
  • #4
rbj said:
couldn't it be just as plausible that all of the universe "exploded" (i know that's the wrong word for this in the Big Bang) from a space as large as a solar system, or a star, or a planet, or a basketball?
But then we would have to explain why it's that size, why it expanded from that point, and what it was like before that point.

Especially that last one. How did it get to be the size of a planet or a basketball and expanding rapidly? The most logical answer as to how it got to this size is that it was even smaller and expanded to that size. There's no reason in physics that prevents it from benig smaller than a basketball.
 

1. What is the significance of a universe smaller than a proton?

A universe smaller than a proton would be incredibly tiny, and it would have significant implications for our understanding of the universe. It would challenge our current theories and models of the universe, and could potentially revolutionize our understanding of the fundamental building blocks of the universe.

2. How is it possible for a universe to be smaller than a proton?

The concept of a universe smaller than a proton is purely theoretical at this point. It is based on the idea that the universe could have a different number of dimensions than the four we currently know about (three spatial dimensions and one time dimension). In a universe with extra dimensions, it is possible for the fabric of space-time to be compressed to a size smaller than a proton.

3. What would be the implications of a universe smaller than a proton for the Big Bang theory?

If a universe smaller than a proton were proven to exist, it would challenge the Big Bang theory, which is currently the most widely accepted explanation for the origin of the universe. It would require a new theory to explain how such a tiny universe came into existence and how it evolved into the universe we know today.

4. Could we ever observe a universe smaller than a proton?

It is highly unlikely that we would ever be able to directly observe a universe smaller than a proton. The scale is so incredibly small that it would be beyond the capabilities of our current technology. However, scientists are constantly pushing the boundaries of our understanding and technology, so it is not impossible that we may one day find a way to observe such a universe.

5. How does the concept of a universe smaller than a proton relate to string theory?

The concept of a universe smaller than a proton is closely related to string theory, which is a theoretical framework that attempts to reconcile the laws of physics governing the very large (general relativity) with those governing the very small (quantum mechanics). In string theory, it is possible for particles to exist in multiple dimensions, which could allow for a universe smaller than a proton to exist.

Similar threads

Replies
49
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top