My school has a super-nice professor who gives numerous 4.0s to students in QM

In summary, the professor likely has a set of criteria to determine a 4.0 grade in QM, which may include test scores, participation, and understanding of the material. The fairness of giving out numerous 4.0s is subjective and can vary in opinions. The leniency of the professor's approach may affect the rigor of the course, but it depends on the balance between difficulty and grading criteria. There may be potential consequences for the professor's decision, but as long as they follow school policies, there may not be significant repercussions. The effect of the grading approach on students' learning and understanding is complex and can vary from student to student. Ultimately, it is up to the individual student to take responsibility for their own
  • #1
Simfish
Gold Member
823
2
And it has one of the largest physics+astrophysics undergraduate enrollments in the nation.

Will graduate admissions committees know about this? Especially if they have many applicants from my school? Will this devalue a high grade in that QM course?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Simfish said:
Will graduate admissions committees know about this?

Probably

Especially if they have many applicants from my school? Will this devalue a high grade in that QM course?

I think people on this list assume that graduate committees care more about grades than they actually do.
 

1. How does the professor determine who receives a 4.0 in QM?

The professor likely has a set of criteria that they use to determine a student's grade in QM. This may include factors such as test scores, class participation, and overall understanding of the material.

2. Is it fair for the professor to give out numerous 4.0s in QM?

This is a subjective question and can vary depending on individual opinions. Some may argue that it is fair if the students are meeting the necessary requirements for a 4.0, while others may argue that it is not fair to other students who may have worked just as hard but did not receive a 4.0.

3. Does the professor's leniency in giving out 4.0s affect the rigor of the QM course?

This is a valid concern, as the rigor of a course can be affected by the grading system. However, it ultimately depends on how the professor balances the difficulty of the material and the grading criteria. It is possible for a course to be challenging and still have a high percentage of students receiving 4.0s.

4. Are there any potential consequences for the professor's decision to give out numerous 4.0s in QM?

It is possible that the professor's actions could be questioned by the school or other faculty members. However, as long as the professor is following the school's policies and grading criteria, there may not be any significant consequences.

5. How does the professor's grading approach affect the students' learning and understanding of QM?

This is a complex question and can vary depending on the individual student. Some students may feel that they are not truly earning their 4.0 if it is given easily, while others may appreciate the confidence boost and motivation to continue excelling in the subject. It is ultimately up to the individual student to take responsibility for their own learning and understanding of QM, regardless of the grading approach of the professor.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
3
Views
946
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
15
Views
908
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top