Can We Detect an Ongoing Enlarging of Everything in the Universe?

  • Thread starter jharvath
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the possibility of everything in the universe getting bigger and whether it would be detectable. It is determined that the question itself is problematic and not based on current physical knowledge. There are multiple interpretations of "getting bigger" and not enough information to accurately answer the question. Ultimately, the concept of "bigger" is subjective and cannot be defined without a reference point.
  • #1
jharvath
3
0
If everything in the universe were getting bigger, would there be any way for us to detect that, or on the contrary, would there be no way to know, no experiment we could perform, which would allow us to confirm an ongoing enlarging of everything?

I have this idea that there is no way to know if this is happening...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
All we can detect are changes to the dimensionless constants. If everything got bigger without changing any of the dimensionless constants then we would not be able to detect it.
 
  • #3
what about inertial mass - if two objects that were growing in size were touching each other, would it not be the case that they would push upon each other?
 
  • #4
jharvath said:
what about inertial mass - if two objects that were growing in size were touching each other, would it not be the case that they would push upon each other?

No, because the distance between them would be increasing too.
 
  • #5
jharvath said:
If everything in the universe were getting bigger, [...]

There are many problems with posing such a question.

  1. If you and your ruler/measuring rod are "getting bigger" simultaneously, how could you tell anything is getting bigger at all?
  2. "Getting bigger" in respect to what?
Such problems arise when a question contradicts itself/is a circular reasoning. If anything is getting bigger, it has to get bigger in comparison to something else. Since the Universe encompasses everything, this else has to be part of the Universe. So this else would also get bigger. From a physics perspective, the question makes no sense. It is more metaphysical, i.e. part of philosophy. Now, the Universe is expanding of course, and this can be measured.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
So, it seems as though, if it were the case that the everything in the universe were getting bigger there would be no way we detect that using current level of physical knowledge.
 
  • #7
You cannot even define what "bigger" means. This is not a question of physical knowledge.
 
  • #8
There are many ways to "get bigger".

If "everything gets bigger" means that everthing, while getting bigger, keeps working exactly the same way, every gear keeps turning, every tree keeps growing the same way, and so on, then no, of course you can't detect it, since everything is the same as before. You build a scenario where everything is the same and then ask if we can find something different ? :uhh: The question itself is meaningless. Notice that when you imagine everything getting bigger, you have to keep something constant, for example you "see" objects getting larger with respect to your field of vision.

On the other hand, there are many ways in which everything could get bigger in a detectable way, but I think they don't correspond to what you meant. For example, an ant can lift many times its weight, because the section of its muscles is big in respect to its mass; if everything got bigger, you could see ants (and yourself) getting weaker. But this assumes that lots of things, like atom sizes, don't grow. Or, light could take more time to go through an object if it's bigger - and this actually happens, though only on a very big scale.
 

What is meant by "Everything getting bigger"?

"Everything getting bigger" refers to the concept that objects, organisms, and structures in our universe are constantly growing in size or quantity.

What is the evidence for "Everything getting bigger"?

Scientists have observed patterns of growth in various fields, such as astronomy, biology, and geology, that support the idea of "Everything getting bigger." For example, galaxies are expanding, animals are evolving to be larger, and mountains are growing taller over time.

Is there a limit to how big things can get?

There is currently no known limit to the size of objects in our universe. However, the laws of physics and the availability of resources can place constraints on growth and prevent infinite expansion.

What causes "Everything getting bigger"?

The exact causes of "Everything getting bigger" are still being studied and debated. Some potential factors include the expansion of the universe, natural selection leading to larger and more complex organisms, and geological processes like plate tectonics creating larger landmasses.

What are the potential implications of "Everything getting bigger"?

"Everything getting bigger" can have both positive and negative implications. On one hand, it can lead to greater diversity and complexity in our universe. On the other hand, it can also lead to resource depletion and potential conflicts as organisms and societies compete for space and resources.

Similar threads

  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
3
Views
945
Replies
9
Views
686
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
11
Views
382
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Optics
2
Replies
41
Views
419
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
388
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top