Do some scientists create equation that arent based on si units.

lundyjb

The base units are meters kg and seconds, right? So are some equations meant to use a different set, like cm kg minutes or something. And is it always assumed to be si unless told otherwise?

salzrah

any equation's variables can be converted from one unit to another; no equation is "meant to use a different set" but can be written in another way. In most physics textbooks only SI units are used.

voko

In certain cases equations might be simpler in some particular system of units. A particularly famous one is that where the units are such that all the fundamental constants (Planck's constant, speed of light, gravitational constant) equal 1 and simply omitted from the equations. These units, however, are completely unsuitable for practical use. A more practical example is the Gaussian units, which partially overlap with SI. In these units, equations of electrodynamics are somewhat simpler, so many texts use them. In non-relativistic classical mechanics equations are usually independent of the choice of units.

In any case, anyone using any equation ought to mention assumptions on the units.

CWatters

People use non-SI units every day. Classic example would the fuel consumption of your car being specified in miles per gallon.

However you should never assume any particular units have been used. Always check and recheck..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Climate_Orbiter

However, on September 23, 1999, communication with the spacecraft was lost as the spacecraft went into orbital insertion, due to ground based computer software which produced output in Imperial units of pound-seconds (lbf-s) instead of the specified metric units of newton-seconds (N-s). The spacecraft encountered Mars at an improperly low altitude, causing it to incorrectly enter the upper atmosphere and disintegrate.

CWatters

In some fields of work it's vey inconvenient to use SI base units such as the meter. Astronomers frequently work in "light years" for example.

voko

What I hear from some friendly astronomers is that light-years as a distance unit has a ring of SciFi affection to it. Parsec is perceived as the more appropriate unit.

Similar Threads for: Do some scientists create equation that arent based on si units.
Thread	Forum	Replies
How's Tipler's Physics for Scientists and Engineers (Calculus based)?	Science Textbook Discussion	2
Can scientists 'create' life yet?	Biology	30
Why arent Plancks constant's relative?	Special & General Relativity	15
Ban on scientists trying to create three-parent baby	Biology	25

lundyjb	Do some scientists create equation that arent based on si units. Tweet The base units are meters kg and seconds, right? So are some equations meant to use a different set, like cm kg minutes or something. And is it always assumed to be si unless told otherwise?

salzrah	any equation's variables can be converted from one unit to another; no equation is "meant to use a different set" but can be written in another way. In most physics textbooks only SI units are used.

CWatters	In some fields of work it's vey inconvenient to use SI base units such as the meter. Astronomers frequently work in "light years" for example.

voko	What I hear from some friendly astronomers is that light-years as a distance unit has a ring of SciFi affection to it. Parsec is perceived as the more appropriate unit.