Register to reply 
Is 0<d,l<1 equivalent to writing separately 0<d<1 and 0<l<1 ? 
Share this thread: 
#1
Apr714, 03:00 AM

P: 3

Dear all, I'm writing a paper for a scientific journal and I need to save as much typographic space as I can. In a proposition, I need to specify that the parameters "d" and "l" assume values between zero and one. I am wondering if (in scientific writing) is it correct to write "0<d,l<1", instead of writing separately "0<d<1" and "0<l<1". Thanks!



#2
Apr714, 03:45 AM

HW Helper
P: 3,540

The way I see it, if it is clear to the reader and doesn't need moments to be deciphered, it's good enough to use. 


#3
Apr714, 06:46 AM

P: 3

Thanks, Mentallic!



#4
Apr714, 09:30 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,807

Is 0<d,l<1 equivalent to writing separately 0<d<1 and 0<l<1 ?
I would personally interpret that as 0<d and l<1, but I don't know if this is common. The comma seems to separate the two statements "0<d" and "l<1".
What about [tex]d,l \in (0,1)[/tex]? 


#5
Apr714, 09:47 AM

Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 39,565

I also would tend to interpret "0< d,l< 1" as "0< d< 1" and "0< l< 1" or "both d and l are between 0 and 1". If you mean 0< d and l< 1, grammatically, you should have the word "and" between them, not a comma.



#6
Apr714, 10:08 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,807

How would one interpret the sentence "0<d, l<1 and p>3"?
This is probably an insignificant issue, but grammatically commas are used to separate things. 


#7
Apr714, 10:18 AM

P: 1,302

I tend to agree with HOI here, but the context does matter. If this was part of a statement that disregardthat proposes, I would lean the other way.
But if there was no listing of relations, and the comma appeared instead of an and, there would be no reason to write something that way unless you meant what the OP intended. 


#8
Apr714, 10:52 AM

Mentor
P: 18,331

I often write ##0<d,l<1## to mean ##0<d<1## and ##0<l<1##. I've also seen it in a lot of mathematical texts, so I guess it's standard.



#9
Apr714, 12:32 PM

P: 1

I agree with micromass, it (or in equivalent circumstances) is used regularly in school level maths



#10
Apr714, 02:57 PM

P: 3




#11
Apr714, 08:05 PM

HW Helper
P: 3,540

0<d,l<1 is a quite commonly used expression, while it's very uncommon to put the variable of an unbounded inequality on the right side. 0<d would most often than not be d>0. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Suggestion Linking to crank or crackpot sites is prohibited. , discussion.  Forum Feedback & Announcements  10  
In binary can we have a value with deci centi mili or more lower valued prefix?  Computers  14  
Meaning of a Flat, Open, and Closed Universe  Cosmology  21  
Could a Black Hole be the cycle of Dark Matter powered by Dar Energy:?  General Physics  3  
Difference between Identical , Equal , Equivalent  Calculus & Beyond Homework  9 