Reducing ZnO to Zn: Thermal vs. Electrowinning

In summary, the two commercial methods of reducing ZnO to Zn appear to be Thermal, in the presence of C, and electrowinning: ZnO + H2SO4 → ZnSO4 + H2O (followed by electrolysis on the ZnSO4). But what is the effect of straight electrolysis on ZnO in the presence of some electrolyte to begin with?
  • #1
mheslep
Gold Member
364
729
The two commercial methods of reducing ZnO to Zn appear to be
Thermal, in the presence of C:
2 ZnO + C → 2 Zn + CO2
and electrowinning:
ZnO + H2SO4 → ZnSO4 + H2O (followed by electrolysis on the ZnSO4)

But what is the effect of straight electrolysis on ZnO in the presence of some electrolyte to begin with? That is, doesn't electrolysis directly reduce ZnO (as in a charging a depleted Zn-Air battery), and if that's the case why isn't ZnO electrolysis an economic way of producing Zn from ore?
 
  • Like
Likes sudipta
Chemistry news on Phys.org
  • #2
zinc oxide is nearly insoluble in water or non-acidic electrolyte.

I'm not sure about the economics of the two processes you reference. I would imagine the electrowinning process produces very pure material and the carbon reduction would produce less pure product.
 
  • #3
Probably is possible to get Zn from electrolysis of melted ZnO at high temperatures using a flux, as the way Al is produced from Al2O3 using Na3AlF6 as flux. In the case of Al there is quite no other way (you don't get Al from the oxide reducing it with C and you don't get Al from electrolysis of acqueous solutions of its salts); in the case of Zn the two processes you described are certainly much more simple and cheap, so I presume it's for this reason they are used.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Probably my OP question is ill phrased. Let me try again.

Given a Zn anode, who's surface is largely oxidized to ZnO, and the ZnO is in contact with some alkaline electrolyte, should not the application of an electric potential to the electrode force reduction of the ZnO? Assume anything you like for the cathode, i.e. air via some porous material:

ZnO + 2e + H2O → Zn(OH)2 → 2OH- + Zn

This is basically a Zinc Air battery being charged. The Zn need never enter solution, and no high temperatures required. It should be inexpensive?
 
  • #5
Oh, I see that's a non trivial amount of charge per kg of Zn:

Zn @ 65g/mole
1 mole e = 96485 C, 3600 C / amp-hour
1 mole e = 26 amp-hours, or
52 amp-hours per mole of Zn,
800 amp-hours per kg of Zn @ 2V = 1.6 kWh per kg of Zn.

That's about $0.12 per kg Zn, with see Zinc @ $2.1/kg, about 6% of the cost. Seems reasonable.
 

1. What is the difference between thermal and electrowinning methods for reducing ZnO to Zn?

Thermal reduction involves heating ZnO with a reducing agent, such as carbon or hydrogen, to high temperatures to produce zinc metal. Electrowinning, on the other hand, uses an electrical current to break down ZnO into zinc metal through a process called electrolysis.

2. Which method is more energy-efficient?

Electrowinning typically requires less energy than thermal reduction, as it only uses electricity to produce zinc metal. However, the efficiency can vary depending on the specific process and conditions used.

3. What are the main factors that influence the choice between thermal and electrowinning methods?

The choice between thermal and electrowinning methods depends on factors such as the purity and quantity of zinc required, the availability and cost of energy, and the specific application of the zinc metal.

4. Are there any environmental considerations when choosing between thermal and electrowinning methods?

Both methods have potential environmental impacts, such as emissions from energy production or waste disposal. However, electrowinning may be considered more environmentally friendly as it does not involve high temperatures and can potentially use renewable energy sources.

5. How does the cost compare between thermal and electrowinning methods?

The cost of each method can vary depending on factors such as energy prices and capital investments. Generally, electrowinning may be more expensive in terms of initial setup costs, but can be more cost-effective in the long run due to its potential for energy efficiency and use of renewable energy sources.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
4K
Back
Top