About the n-point Green functions in position-space

In summary: The numerical approach would evaluate the integral at a number of points, fit some rational function with the correct symmetry to the values of the integrals, and then analytically continue the resulting rational function back to Minkowski space.
  • #1
kmyzzmy
1
0
When we want to calculate the n-point function in the position space, it's always very difficult. For example, when we're calculate the 3-point function of [tex]\phi^3[/tex] theory in position space, we would get an integral
[tex]\int d^4 z \frac{1}{|z-x_1|^2|z-x_2|^2|z-x_3|^2}[/tex]
It seems hard to integrate it.
I'm wondering if anyone has already done this before. Or is there any theory to calculate these kind of integrals?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Usually done numerically
 
  • #3
stone said:
Usually done numerically

But then you don't get it as a function of x_1, x_2, and x_3!
 
  • #4
Of course, but you can do it various values of x_i's
Although I am pretty sure there must be some analytical forms for phi^3 theory. But in general for arbitrary perturbations, it is always done numerically.
 
  • #5
stone said:
Of course, but you can do it various values of x_i's
Although I am pretty sure there must be some analytical forms for phi^3 theory. But in general for arbitrary perturbations, it is always done numerically.

Could you please give some online references for the numerical approach to n-particle Green's functions (not necessarily of Phi^3)?
 
  • #7
stone said:
Most of the applications are in condensed matter systems
users.physik.fu-berlin.de/~pelster/Papers/green.pdf
www.fz-juelich.de/nic-series/volume32/assaad.pdf

Thanks. But one needs to reduce the dimension to make the numerics tractable.

By Euclidean invariance, one can reduce the integral of the OP to the case where x_1=0, x_2=(u,0,0,0), x_3=(v,w,0,0). Thus one is left with a 3-parameter integral. The integration domain can also be reduced to 3D by using polar coordinates in the last two components, and integrating over the angle analytically.

Then one is left with a 3-parameter family of 3D integrals. Still, to map out the resulting function reliably requires a lot of numerical integrations.
 
  • #8
A. Neumaier said:
Thanks. But one needs to reduce the dimension to make the numerics tractable.

By Euclidean invariance, one can reduce the integral of the OP to the case where x_1=0, x_2=(u,0,0,0), x_3=(v,w,0,0). Thus one is left with a 3-parameter integral. The integration domain can also be reduced to 3D by using polar coordinates in the last two components, and integrating over the angle analytically.

Then one is left with a 3-parameter family of 3D integrals. Still, to map out the resulting function reliably requires a lot of numerical integrations.

So normally when you go Euclidean space, you calculate [tex]<0|\phi(-iu_0,u)\phi(-ix_0,x)\phi(-iy_0,y)|0> [/tex], and then the integral over the internal vertex d4z :


[tex]
\int d^4 z \frac{1}{|z-u|^2|z-x|^2|z-y|^2}
[/tex]

can be reduced from 4 dimensions to 3 via contour integration and selecting the poles which are now off axis? Once you get your answer this way, wherever you see u0, you replace it with iu0, and similarly with x0 and y0?

But now since you are working with numerical values, then you don't know how to back substitute since all the variables became numbers, so you can't do things this way?

So you have to work directly with this integral:

[tex]
\int d^4 z \frac{1}{|z-u|^2|z-x|^2|z-y|^2}
[/tex]

where u,x, and y are all real time instead of imaginary time. So how do you make the squared terms Euclidean?
 
  • #9
RedX said:
But now since you are working with numerical values, then you don't know how to back substitute since all the variables became numbers, so you can't do things this way?

I had assumed that the integral was already Euclidean, since one wouldn't use absolute values in Minkowski space.

The numerical approach would evaluate the integral at a number of points, fit some rational function with the correct symmetry to the values of the integrals, and then analytically continue the resulting rational function back to Minkowski space.
 

1. What are n-point Green functions in position-space?

N-point Green functions in position-space are mathematical objects that describe the correlation between particles at different points in space. They are used in quantum field theory to calculate the probability amplitudes for particle interactions.

2. How are n-point Green functions related to Feynman diagrams?

N-point Green functions can be expressed in terms of Feynman diagrams, which are graphical representations of particle interactions. Each term in the Green function corresponds to a specific Feynman diagram, making it a useful tool for calculating complex interactions.

3. What is the significance of using position-space in n-point Green functions?

Position-space is used in n-point Green functions because it allows for a more intuitive understanding of particle interactions. By representing the correlation between particles at different points in space, it provides a physical interpretation of the mathematical calculations.

4. How do n-point Green functions differ from other correlation functions?

N-point Green functions differ from other correlation functions, such as momentum-space correlation functions, because they take into account the position of particles in addition to their momenta. This makes them more suitable for describing interactions in real space.

5. What are some applications of n-point Green functions in physics?

N-point Green functions have various applications in physics, including calculating cross-sections for particle collisions, determining the behavior of quantum systems, and studying the properties of materials. They are also used in the development of new theories and models in quantum field theory.

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
587
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
624
Replies
7
Views
787
Replies
1
Views
701
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
13
Views
754
Replies
2
Views
856
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
9
Views
790
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
61
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
517
Back
Top