Magnetohydrodynamic Power Generator.

In summary, the study started in 2001 and was published in 2007. Although it is still a popular idea, there are some limitations that need to be overcome before it can be implemented on planes.
  • #1
Urmi Roy
753
1
I'm writing a paper on MHD. I wanted to know briefly about
1. why is MHD no longer a very popular idea.
2. Whether its worthwhile to think about it as a possible feature of hypersonic planes in the future inspite of its dwindling popularity.

If possible, please provide links.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
1) What do you mean it is no longer popular? MHD is still used in certain areas, such as DBD plasma actuators. Be a bit more specific.

2) As part of hypersonic vehicles how? And for what purpose? Again, be more specific.
 
  • #3
hi,

I'm specifically referring to application of MHD generators in hypersonic airplanes with ramjet or scramjet engines...as mentioned in the article http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA473277

However, this article has too much math, whereas I'd like to shed light on the advantages of using this technology in future planes instead of going into the details of the fluid dynamics...I tried searching for other articles, but till now with no success..
 
  • #4
Well I guess I will start by saying that MHD is a much broader field than just this paper. This is detailing a method of generating power from an ionized gas (plasma) moving through a magnetic field, but MHD covers the flow of any fluid under the influence of a magnetic field for many, many purposes.

Anyway, moving on, nothing in here makes me think that this is no longer a popular idea. The study started in 2001 and was published in 2007. That is very recent. Why do you say it is no longer popular?

The reason you haven't seen it on a plane or other vehicle yet is because there are no hypersonic vehicles at this point in time, and that is the only way this concept works. It needs a scramjet, and it was only recently shown that a scramjet would work the way it should. A ramjet wouldn't get the internal flow fast enough to see dissociation of the gas. Still, there are several more pressing issues to tackle when it comes to getting a hypersonic vehicle flying, most notably perfecting the scramjet, understanding boundary layer stability at those speeds and developing materials that are lightweight and strong while also being resistant to extreme heat. They all must be understood better before an MHD power generator would be feasible.

Obviously you need a working scramjet for this system to work. The problem is, this system was studied in an idealized case where the flow was passing through the annular channel between two cylinders. Scramjets aren't build that way. Scramjets must be built in very precise ways in order to get them to start, otherwise you just end up with a fast-moving, inert hunk of steel and metal with no working engine. Something would have to be reconciled between the current working designs of scramjets and the studies on MHD power generation.

In addition to the shape, the engine requires an additive seed chemical to get it to burn hot enough to ionize the gas. Ordinarily, a scramjet would not get hot enough. This means that you need a material at the scramjet nozzle that is even more heat resistant than you would have otherwise as well as more heat resistant materials inside the combustion chamber. Both of those are limitations that likely cannot be solved yet without considerable research.

Additionally, you would have to get those seed particles to mix into the flow, which is not very easy to do. They have problems right now trying to get the fuel to mix in with the flow, as the incoming air flow is naturally laminar. The solution is to trip the flow heading towards the inlet which is done using huge trips since we don't completely understand the transition process at those speeds. Then you combine that with essentially a fuel injecting mesh that injects fuel into all points of the flow instead of just the wall or a single point. Now you have to add another mesh for the seed particles, which is more blockage and diminished power.

The final problem is that in extracting energy from the flow, you are slowing it down and losing thrust. Current scramjets such as the X-51 can only just keep the vehicle moving at the speed the rocket leaves it. They can't push it any faster yet. Basically, that means that taking any thrust out would mean they can't even keep the speed constant where the rocket leaves off.

What does all this mean? It means we are years away from seeing this kind of technology on a hypersonic vehicle because there is just so much to do to even make a working vehicle still. Once that happens, then someone can see if an MHD generator is even feasible on a real hypersonic vehicle rather than just in a lab.
 
  • #5
Thanks boneh3ad , I guess all the points you mentioned could be used to highlight the challenges that we face to introduce the concept of MHD generator in hypersonic vehicles in my paper...but since I'm doing my undergrads right now and my knowledge is, on the whole ,restricted, couldn't I make a paper stating that there is a possibility of such a thing as a MHD generator in a scramjet, tell people about how it would work and why we haven't got there yet inspite of it being such a great idea? Would you suggest I go for another topic instead?
 
  • #7
Be careful what you read on random forums. This guy mentioned MHD propulsion. What you cited at the top was the the means of propulsion, but the means of extracting electrical power from a scramjet, which has no turbine like a traditional jet engine.

I can't say whether you should switch topics because I know nothing about your assignment or what class it is for or what your level of technical competence may be. Suffice it to say that the world of hypersonic flight is a very rich area filled with a lot of cool stuff, but it also may take some time to familiarize yourself with it.
 
  • #8
Thanks for your advice, boneh3ad :-)...I'll take it step by step and see if I'm ready to take up this topic yet. Your information will be of much value...thanks again.
 

1. What is a Magnetohydrodynamic Power Generator?

A Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) Power Generator is a device that converts heat energy into electricity using a combination of magnetic and fluid dynamics principles. It consists of a hot plasma, a magnetic field, and electrodes to create an electric current.

2. How does a Magnetohydrodynamic Power Generator work?

The MHD Power Generator works by passing a conductive fluid, such as molten salt, through a magnetic field. The fluid is heated to high temperatures, creating a plasma state. As the fluid moves through the magnetic field, it generates an electric current, which can be harnessed as electricity.

3. What are the advantages of a Magnetohydrodynamic Power Generator?

One advantage of an MHD Power Generator is that it does not have moving parts, making it more reliable and requiring less maintenance. It is also more efficient than traditional steam turbines, as it can utilize a wider range of temperatures and does not have energy losses from friction.

4. What are the limitations of a Magnetohydrodynamic Power Generator?

One limitation of an MHD Power Generator is that it requires high temperatures to operate efficiently, which can be challenging to achieve and maintain. It also produces a lot of heat, which needs to be managed carefully to prevent damage to the equipment.

5. What are the applications of Magnetohydrodynamic Power Generators?

MHD Power Generators have been used in various applications, including power plants, space propulsion systems, and in experimental fusion reactors. They can also be used in combination with other renewable energy sources, such as solar or geothermal energy, to provide a more stable and reliable power supply.

Similar threads

  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
0
Views
584
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
660
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
741
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
34
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
925
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
653
Back
Top