Star Wars Potential: Can Lasers Replace Nuclear Bombs?

In summary: Anything is possible. A Boeing 747, Lufthansa AirBus or C-5 Galaxy can be retrofitted by a Fusion Reactor (x1000+ times more powerful compared to other powersource systems).In summary, a system of lasers cannot be built to deliver a vast amount of energy on a small spot on Earth as a substitute for a nuclear bomb. While a prototype of an airborne laser is being built, there are still technical hurdles to overcome such as targeting and beam coherence. There have been proposals to power a laser with a nuclear bomb, but this has not been successfully implemented. Additionally, there have been challenges in making a powerful enough laser that can fit on a small aircraft. Retrofitting a large aircraft with
  • #1
sid_galt
502
1
Can a system of lasers be built which has the ability to deliver a vast amount of energy on a small spot on Earth making it a possible effective substitute of the nuclear bomb?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Certainly not, unless you could power a laser or energy beam with a nuclear bomb (ie, a focused emp or something like that). A nuclear bomb outputs more energy than everything else on Earth combined at the time it goes off.

In any case, that's not what Star Wars is: its an anti-ballistic missile defense.
 
  • #3
russ_watters said:
Certainly not, unless you could power a laser or energy beam with a nuclear bomb (ie, a focused emp or something like that). A nuclear bomb outputs more energy than everything else on Earth combined at the time it goes off.
OK.
russ_watters said:
In any case, that's not what Star Wars is: its an anti-ballistic missile defense.

Well, can that be done?
 
  • #4
sid_galt said:
Well, can that be done?
Yes, a prototype of a daughter technolgoy, the Airborne Laser is being built right now. http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/military/abl/flash.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
russ_watters said:
Yes, a prototype of a daughter technolgoy, the Airborne Laser is being built right now. http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/military/abl/flash.html

Thank you. So why isn't it succesful?

Difficulty in targeting? Can't they use a little spread out beam with a higher amplitude so that they don't have to be so accurate with their aim?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #6
sid_galt said:
Thank you. So why isn't it succesful?

Difficulty in targeting? Can't they use a little spread out beam with a higher amplitude so that they don't have to be so accurate with their aim?
So far, it is successful. Do you mean why hasn't it been done before? There are a mountain of technical hurles to overcome (now mostly overcome). Targeting is one, laser power output is another, and beam coherence (when you heat the air it gets turbulent and disperses the beam) is another.
 
  • #7
russ_watters said:
Certainly not, unless you could power a laser or energy beam with a nuclear bomb
According to Richard Garwin, the SDI's pop-up infrared laser was to be powered by an exploding fission device. This is not to imply that all of the fission energy would be transferred through the laser beam.
 
  • #8
hitssquad said:
According to Richard Garwin, the SDI's pop-up infrared laser was to be powered by an exploding fission device. This is not to imply that all of the fission energy would be transferred through the laser beam.
I didn't know that. I did know its possible (in theory) to direct the energy from a nuclear bomb - Tom Clancy described a similar phenomena in The Sum of all Fears, where a vaporizing TV dish (in an atomic bomb blast) emitted a focused-emp that knocked out the satellite it was aimed at.

[Google...] A few sites mention a nuclear x-ray laser (I'd heard of the x-ray laser, but not that it was powered by a nuclear weapon), but it doesn't look to me like that ever got off the drawing board. In any case, it seems it was at least possible.
 
  • #9
russ_watters said:
[Google...] A few sites mention a nuclear x-ray laser
Oops. That seems correct. It must indeed have been an X-ray laser. I read about it 20 years ago in Garwin's The Fallacy of Star Wars and have not brushed up on that issue since then.


Edit: The Union of Concerned Scientists http://www.ucsusa.org/ucs/about/page.cfm?pageID=769 mentions Kurt Gottfried as the "senior author" of The Fallacy of Star Wars, and Amazon.com lists John Tirman as the only author. However, IIRC Garwin said in his recent book Megawatts and Megatons that he was one of the contributors.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
sid_galt said:
Thank you. So why isn't it succesful?

Difficulty in targeting? Can't they use a little spread out beam with a higher amplitude so that they don't have to be so accurate with their aim?

There have been problems. The biggest one has been getting a laser sufficiently powerful to fit in a small enough space to fit on a 747.
 
  • #11
Its possible but you would have to increase the mass.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Anything is possible. A Boeing 747, Lufthansa AirBus or C-5 Galaxy can be retrofitted by a Fusion Reactor (x1000+ times more powerful compared to other powersource systems).

Like a mobile/portable version of this one http://fusion.gat.com/diii-d/photos/
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. What makes lasers a potential replacement for nuclear bombs in Star Wars?

Lasers have been featured in the Star Wars franchise as powerful weapons capable of destroying large targets. They are often depicted as being more precise and controllable than nuclear bombs, making them a viable alternative in combat scenarios.

2. How do lasers compare to nuclear bombs in terms of destructive power?

While both lasers and nuclear bombs can cause significant destruction, the amount of energy released by a nuclear bomb is far greater than that of a laser. Nuclear bombs release energy through nuclear fission or fusion reactions, while lasers use focused light to generate heat and destroy targets.

3. Are lasers more environmentally friendly than nuclear bombs?

Lasers are often portrayed as being a cleaner and more environmentally friendly alternative to nuclear bombs, as they do not leave behind radioactive fallout. However, the production and use of high-powered lasers also have the potential to harm the environment, and their impact on the atmosphere is still being studied.

4. Are there any limitations to using lasers as weapons in Star Wars?

In the Star Wars universe, lasers are portrayed as being powerful and effective weapons, but they also have their limitations. For instance, they can be deflected or blocked by certain materials or objects, and their effectiveness can be reduced by atmospheric conditions or jamming technology.

5. Could lasers completely replace nuclear bombs in the future?

While the use of lasers as weapons is a possibility, it is unlikely that they will completely replace nuclear bombs in the near future. Nuclear weapons have a long history of being used as a deterrent and a means of defense, and their destructive power is unmatched by any other weapon technology.

Similar threads

  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
15
Views
714
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
10
Views
491
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
2
Replies
49
Views
2K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
660
Back
Top