Inertia of two masses m2 connected to a rod.

In summary, the moment of inertia is the sum of the moment of inertia of each sphere about its center and the moment of inertia of the rod about its center.
  • #1
cooev769
114
0
I have never dealt with moment of inertia before, this is a physics lab i need to do some pre planning for which involves topics we have never covered and are expected to learn. I've been busy working two jobs and am struggling to get time to pick up this before my lab tomorrow so some help would be extremely helpful.

We have a rod with length 2d, spinning at its centre. With 2 masses on either side of mass m2, the masses are spherical with radius r. What is the moment of inertia?

The answers is:

[itex] I=2 m_2 (d^2 + \frac{2}{5} r2) [/itex]

By my logic the moment of inertia is the sum of each component, we have two masses m2 and their centre of gravity is d+r away from the centre hence each sphere will contribute, based on the inertia of a sphere:

[itex] I_(spheres) =2 \frac{2}{5} m_2 (r + d)^2 [/itex]

And then add the component of the rod, which I believe is ignored as we don't have any value for the mass of the rod. Obviously my assumption is wrong as it isn't the same as the answer. Any tips would be choice. Cheers.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
By the way I should emphasise that the first equation is not 4m(etc), it's 2 m2, meaning mass 2. Just thought i'd clarify just in case don't know how to subscript.
 
  • #3
The spheres have radius r, not r + d. You'll take the moment of inertia of each sphere about its center (which you know) and then compute its moment of inertia about the center of the rod using the parallel axis theorem: Parallel Axis Theorem
 
  • #4
So how come the rods contribute moment of inertia about themselves and around the centre too? that seems slightly confusing.
 
  • #5
Ah i see because the axis running through the sphere is parallel to the axis running through the centre of the rod, the parallel axis theorem says that the I through the rod will be equal to the moment of inertia through the axis through the sphere plus the mass multiplied by the distance between the two parallel axis? Is this interpretation correct? So I get.

[itex] I_t = I_c + m_2 (d+r)^2 [/itex]

Where [itex] I_c [/itex] is moment of inertia with the axis through the centre of the sphere. Is this correct, i used d+r squared because the distance between the two axis would be d+r?
 
Last edited:
  • #6
cooev769 said:
Ah i see because the axis running through the sphere is parallel to the axis running through the centre of the rod, the parallel axis theorem says that the I through the rod will be equal to the moment of inertia through the axis through the sphere plus the mass multiplied by the distance between the two parallel axis? Is this interpretation correct?
Multiplied by the distance squared, I think you mean.

So I get.

[itex] I_t = I_c + m_2 (d+r)^2 [/itex]

Where [itex] I_c [/itex] is moment of inertia with the axis through the centre of the sphere. Is this correct, i used d+r squared because the distance between the two axis would be d+r?
Is the distance from the center of the sphere to the axis of rotation r+d or d? If the spheres are just tacked on to the ends of the 2d rod, then you are correct.
 
  • #7
Okay so to get the answer they arrive at I must therefore assume that somehow the spheres are not just glued on a distance d from the centre but the centre of the spheres are connected to the rod with a hole or something and that the centres of The spheres are actually d away from the central axis?
 
  • #8
cooev769 said:
Okay so to get the answer they arrive at I must therefore assume that somehow the spheres are not just glued on a distance d from the centre but the centre of the spheres are connected to the rod with a hole or something and that the centres of The spheres are actually d away from the central axis?
Yes, exactly. (Did they provide a diagram?)
 
  • #9
Nope. Yeah I guess at poorly worded to question. But pretty trivial now I know the theory. Thanks so much.
 

1. What is the concept of inertia?

Inertia is the tendency of an object to resist changes in its state of motion. It is directly proportional to the mass of the object, meaning that objects with larger mass have greater inertia.

2. How is inertia related to the masses connected to a rod?

In the case of two masses connected to a rod, the inertia of the system is the sum of the individual inertias of the masses. This means that the larger mass will have a greater effect on the system's inertia.

3. How does the length of the rod affect the inertia of the system?

The length of the rod does not directly affect the inertia of the system. However, it can affect the distribution of mass, which can impact the system's overall inertia. A longer rod may result in a greater distance between the masses, leading to a higher inertia.

4. What is the role of the rod in the inertia of the system?

The rod serves as a link between the two masses and helps to distribute the forces acting on the system. It also plays a role in determining the system's center of mass, which can affect the overall inertia.

5. How does the inertia of the system change when the masses are in motion?

The inertia of the system remains constant regardless of the motion of the masses. However, the system's angular momentum may change depending on the distribution of mass and the forces acting on the system.

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
351
Replies
2
Views
864
Replies
2
Views
966
  • Mechanics
Replies
2
Views
493
Replies
31
Views
737
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
69
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
977
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top