Ridge Regression Minimization Proof

In summary, Ridge Regression is a regularized version of linear regression that aims to reduce the impact of multicollinearity and overfitting in the model. The purpose of Ridge Regression Minimization Proof is to mathematically prove its effectiveness in linear regression. It works by using Lagrange multipliers to optimize the cost function and obtain a closed-form solution for the optimal coefficients. The main difference between Ridge Regression and Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) is the addition of a penalty term in the cost function, making Ridge Regression more robust and less sensitive to outliers. It should be used in high-dimensional datasets with a large number of independent variables and when the goal is to improve predictive performance. Interpretability of the model is not a primary concern in
  • #1
zzmanzz
54
0

Homework Statement



Linear family:

[tex]f(x;a) = a_{o} + (a_{1}.a_{2},a_{3},...,a_{k}) \cdot x[\tex]

[tex] (Xa - Y)^t \sigma^{-1} (Xa-Y) + \lambda (a^t a-a^2_{o} [\tex]

[tex] a = (X^t \sigma^{-1} X + \lamda I_{o})^{-1} x^t \sigma^{-1} Y [\tex]

Homework Equations

[tex] Y_{i} = f(x_{i}) + N_{i} [\tex]

i = 1,2,3,4,...,k.

given data [tex] \{ (x_{i},y_{i})\}^2_{i} [\tex]

[tex] x_{i} [\tex] = vector
[tex] y_{i} [\tex] = scalar

to minimize we write

[tex](X(a+\Delta a) - Y)^t \sigma^{-1} (X(a+\Delta a)-Y)[\tex]

[tex]=(Xa - Y)^t \sigma^{-1} (Xa-Y) + \Delta a^t X^t \sigma^{-1} (Xa-Y)+(Xa-Y)^t \sigma^{-1} + O(\Delta a^t \Delta a)[\tex]
[tex]=(Xa - Y)^t \sigma^{-1} (Xa-Y) + 2\Delta a^t X^t \sigma^{-1} (Xa-Y) + O(\Delta a^t \Delta a)
[\tex]
cond for a:

[tex]X^t \sigma^{-1} Xa - X^t \sigma^{-1} X = 0[\tex]

[tex]a = (X^t \sigma^{-1} X)^(-1)X^t \sigma^{-1} Y[\tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Sorry can someone tell me why my latex is off? I am new to the forums and did my best to use the code? Thanks, I will repost.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
zzmanzz said:

Homework Statement



Linear family:

[tex]f(x;a) = a_{o} + (a_{1}.a_{2},a_{3},...,a_{k}) \cdot x[\tex]

[tex] (Xa - Y)^t \sigma^{-1} (Xa-Y) + \lambda (a^t a-a^2_{o} [\tex]

[tex] a = (X^t \sigma^{-1} X + \lamda I_{o})^{-1} x^t \sigma^{-1} Y [\tex]

Homework Equations




[tex] Y_{i} = f(x_{i}) + N_{i} [\tex]

i = 1,2,3,4,...,k.

given data [tex] \{ (x_{i},y_{i})\}^2_{i} [\tex]

[tex] x_{i} [\tex] = vector
[tex] y_{i} [\tex] = scalar

to minimize we write

[tex](X(a+\Delta a) - Y)^t \sigma^{-1} (X(a+\Delta a)-Y)[\tex]

[tex]=(Xa - Y)^t \sigma^{-1} (Xa-Y) + \Delta a^t X^t \sigma^{-1} (Xa-Y)+(Xa-Y)^t \sigma^{-1} + O(\Delta a^t \Delta a)[\tex]
[tex]=(Xa - Y)^t \sigma^{-1} (Xa-Y) + 2\Delta a^t X^t \sigma^{-1} (Xa-Y) + O(\Delta a^t \Delta a)
[\tex]
cond for a:

[tex]X^t \sigma^{-1} Xa - X^t \sigma^{-1} X = 0[\tex]

[tex]a = (X^t \sigma^{-1} X)^(-1)X^t \sigma^{-1} Y[\tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Sorry can someone tell me why my latex is off? I am new to the forums and did my best to use the code? Thanks, I will repost.

"\" starts a TeX/LaTeX command; "/" signals "end of TeX. That is, use "[/tex] instead of "[\tex]".

RGV
 

1. What is Ridge Regression?

Ridge regression is a statistical method used for regression analysis, which aims to estimate the relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables. It is a regularized version of linear regression, where a penalty term is added to the cost function to shrink the coefficients towards zero. This helps to reduce the problem of multicollinearity and overfitting in the model.

2. What is the purpose of Ridge Regression Minimization Proof?

The purpose of Ridge Regression Minimization Proof is to mathematically prove the effectiveness of using ridge regression as a regularization technique in linear regression. It shows that by adding a penalty term to the cost function, the coefficients of the model are shrunk towards zero, which helps to reduce the variance of the model and improve its predictive performance.

3. How does Ridge Regression Minimization Proof work?

Ridge Regression Minimization Proof uses the method of Lagrange multipliers to optimize the cost function by simultaneously minimizing the sum of squared errors and the penalty term. This leads to a closed-form solution for the optimal coefficients, which are biased towards zero due to the penalty term. This helps to reduce the impact of multicollinearity and improve the stability of the model.

4. What is the difference between Ridge Regression and Ordinary Least Squares (OLS)?

The main difference between Ridge Regression and Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) is that Ridge Regression adds a penalty term to the cost function, while OLS does not. This penalty term helps to reduce the impact of multicollinearity and overfitting in the model, making Ridge Regression more robust and less prone to outliers. OLS, on the other hand, can be sensitive to outliers and can lead to high variance in the model.

5. When should Ridge Regression be used?

Ridge Regression should be used when dealing with high-dimensional datasets with a large number of independent variables, where multicollinearity and overfitting are likely to occur. It can also be used when the goal is to improve the predictive performance of the model by reducing the variance, even if it leads to a slight increase in bias. Ridge Regression is particularly useful in situations where interpretability of the model is not the primary concern.

Similar threads

Optimization: Dual for L1 norm minimization with equality constraint
    • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
542
Minimization and least squares/ridge regression
    • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Proof that T is bounded below with ##inf T = 2M##
    • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
206
Some trouble with relativistic notations
    • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
Finding integral curves of a vector field
    • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
940
Is the function v(r) = (e^(-mr))/r a solution to the Yukawa PDE equation?
    • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
608
B Any square matrix can be expressed as the sum of anti/symmetric matrices
    • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Fuel paradox arising from Galilean transformation?
    • Mechanics
Replies
4
Views
729
Proof involving group of permutations of {1,2,3,4}.
    • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Linearizing an explicit differentiation scheme
    • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top