Register to reply

Michelson-Gale-Pearson Refutation of Stokes-Planck - Help

Share this thread:
one_raven
#1
Apr16-14, 08:51 AM
P: 239
I'm hoping for some help in understanding how the Michelson-Gale-Pearson experiment in 1925 is held as a refutation of the Stokes-Planck theory of gravitational aether drag.

If I understand the Stokes-Planck theory correctly, complete dragging of the aether near a sufficiently massive body (diminishing at distance, in accordance to the inverse square law as it applies to gravitational force) would be essentially indistinguishable from a complete dragging model. Wouldn't it also be indistinguishable from a non-aetheric model?
Didn't Michelson-Gale-Pearson support that?

What am I missing?

Thanks.
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
New complex oxides could advance memory devices
Nature's designs inspire research into new light-based technologies
UCI team is first to capture motion of single molecule in real time
UltrafastPED
#2
Apr16-14, 11:58 AM
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
UltrafastPED's Avatar
P: 1,911
This should be posted in the Special & General Relativity forum.
one_raven
#3
Apr16-14, 12:19 PM
P: 239
I wasn't sure, because the Stokes-Planck theory was a classical interpretation that pre-dated Relativity - and, if it were accepted, would have stood in opposition to Relativity.

Can I move it, or does a moderator have to?

one_raven
#4
Apr18-14, 12:02 PM
P: 239
Michelson-Gale-Pearson Refutation of Stokes-Planck - Help

Can a moderator move this to the Relativity sub-forum, please?
Maybe it will get a response there.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
The Refutation of Bohmian Mechanics Quantum Physics 235
Resolution refutation help Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 0
Gale and whozum pics General Discussion 3
What is Planck time, Planck length, Planck particle General Physics 5