New Reply

Paradox of star - mesh transform ?

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Sep18-12, 10:20 AM   #1
 

Paradox of star - mesh transform ?


Dear All,

I have encountered the following situation:
Given a node that is connected through n resistors to n ports.
One if the resistors is a negative resistance and equals to minus of all other resistors in parallel.
[itex]\frac{1}{R_n} =- \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \frac{1}{R_i}[/itex]
Using the well known star - mesh transformation, I get
[itex]R_{k,j} = R_k R_j ( \sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{1}{R_i} )[/itex]
that equals to 0, due to the definition of [itex]R_n[/itex].
[itex]R_{k,j} = 0 [/itex]

Therefore, the equivalent mesh representation of this circuit is a shortcut of all nodes.
It makes sense from one side, because the total circuit has zero impedance, but, from the other side, this transform says that all nodes should be of equal voltage. The last one is not true, because in the original network the nodes may have different potentials.

What do I miss ?
Any ideas ?
Are the equivalence transforms applicable for negative resistances ?
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
engineering news on PhysOrg.com

>> NASA: Austin, calling Austin. 3-D pizzas to go
>> Research suggests modular design competence can benefit new product development
>> Army ground combat systems adopts tool for choosing future warfighting vehicles
New Reply

Tags
star-mesh
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Paradox of star - mesh transform ?
Thread Forum Replies
Black hole Nuetron star paradox General Physics 4
Interpolation of pressure from one mesh to another mesh General Physics 4
FEA meshing - why not 2d mesh -> 3d mesh ??? General Engineering 4