Register to reply

Energy resolution of triple-axis spectrometer

Share this thread:
Dec30-13, 03:27 AM
P: 1
I have encountered the problem of energy resolution of neutron triple-axis spectrometer, which we haven't covered during our solid state physics lectures.

I don't know where do we get the equation for the energy resolution from and even the numerical calculations in the solution seem odd to me as I am unable to get the same results. Can someone give me an insight into this or better suggest me some literature covering this problem?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on
'Squid skin' metamaterials project yields vivid color display
Scientists control surface tension to manipulate liquid metals (w/ Video)
Simulation method identifies materials for better batteries
Dec30-13, 08:43 AM
P: 12,064
The total resolution comes from the wavelength distribution of the incoming neutrons together with the accurary of the analyzer - that looks fine. The given uncertainties are relative values, so the energy uncertainty gets multiplied with the corresponding energy.
I would expect a quadratic sum (##\sqrt{a^2+b^2}## instead of a+b) and I don't understand the prefactors of 2, but that could be some (conservative) convention.

I can confirm the neutron energy, I have no idea where the 5 meV come from.
The intermediate step in the final calculation looks completely wrong, but the result of 37µeV agrees with the formula.
M Quack
Dec31-13, 03:40 AM
P: 673, look at sections "Simplification" and "Example". With this you should be able to figure out where the "2" comes from.

The intermediate step should probably read 2 x (13.06 + 8.06) x 10^-3, using the simplification that delta lambda/lambda is pretty much the same for the monochromator and the analyzer.

I agree with mfb that one should probably use a quadratic sum.

The 5 meV is just an example of the excitation one might measure with this inelastic neutron scattering experiment.

Dec31-13, 01:04 PM
P: 12,064
Energy resolution of triple-axis spectrometer

Quote Quote by M Quack View Post, look at sections "Simplification" and "Example". With this you should be able to figure out where the "2" comes from.
The only "2" I see there is related to a correlation between two uncertain parameters, something we do not have here. And we don't have squared parameters either.
M Quack
Dec31-13, 01:30 PM
P: 673
E is quadratic in k and thus lambda, and the error propagation is (or should be)

(delta E)^2 = (delta lambda_0)^2 (d E_0/d lambda_0)^2 + ...

= (delta lambda_0)^2 (-2 hbar^2 /(2m lambda_0^3)^2 + ...

= (delta lambda_0/lambda_0 2 E_0)^2 + ...

correct me if I am wrong. (I have 1/2 bottle of wine as excuse :-))
Dec31-13, 02:00 PM
P: 12,064
Oh right...
Okay, that explains the factor of 2.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Spectrometer Resolution Astronomy & Astrophysics 2
What is energy resolution General Physics 10
About selecting energy range on the spectrometer... High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 3
Changing evaluation of an axis on a triple integral General Math 1
Kinetic energy around an axis - two methods? Introductory Physics Homework 7