|Feb21-13, 09:40 AM||#1|
Numerical integration of Bethe formula in Excel: help!
I am a PhD student in geology in need of help from a physicist! Can somebody spot the mistake in my spreadsheet?
I am using an Excel spreadsheet (attached .xls) to integrate the Bethe formula in order to estimate the range (in cm) of alpha particles in quartz. I am using the version of the formula given in Groom and Klein's "Passage of Particles through Matter": http://pdg.lbl.gov/2009/reviews/rpp2...les-matter.pdf (but ignoring the density effect correction because I am not interested in high energies).
In Excel, I can plot the Bragg peak (dE/dX against x) or the energy of the alpha particle (E against x). Something is very wrong: the Bragg curve just goes up and up and never comes down again (don't be misled by Excel plotting #NUM! as 0). I would expect dE/dX to start out at something like 500 and then smoothly increase up to the peak (like the Bragg peaks in Google image search).
I must be doing something right, though, because it looks as if the stopping distance is going to be close to what I would expect (about 0.04 cm).
Can anybody find the problem in the attached spreadsheet? Reward: credit in my thesis acknowledgements!
|Feb21-13, 02:57 PM||#2|
For low energy (βγ<0.03), the Bethe-Bloch formula gives wrong results, as shown in figure 27.1 in the pdf.
Apart from that: After the energy is 0, the energy loss should be 0 as well, giving a nice Bragg peak.
|alpha, bethe, bloch, integration|
|Similar Threads for: Numerical integration of Bethe formula in Excel: help!|
|Bethe-formula VS SRIM for Uran in Polycarbonate||High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics||0|
|Bethe-Bloch formula for muons||High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics||0|
|Bethe Bloch formula||High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics||1|
|obtaining range from bethe-bloch formula||High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics||2|
|Bethe formula question||High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics||3|