How to interpret wave function as a matrix

In summary, the conversation discusses how the Schrodinger equation and Dirac's matrix mechanics can be written in linear algebraic form. It also mentions that any linear operator can be represented as a matrix. The topic of writing wave functions as matrices and the dimension of these matrices is also brought up. The conversation concludes by mentioning that the Dirac equation is now used in quantum field theory, where the solution is an operator rather than a wavefunction.
  • #1
Black Integra
56
0
As we all know, we can write schrodinger equation in Linear algebraic form.
Also, Dirac had introduced his matrix mechanics.
And we can write any linear operator as matrix.
and so on...

How can we write wave function as matrix?
What is the dimension of this matrix?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Black Integra said:
As we all know, we can write schrodinger equation in Linear algebraic form.
Also, Dirac had introduced his matrix mechanics.
And we can write any linear operator as matrix.
and so on...

How can we write wave function as matrix?
What is the dimension of this matrix?
[itex]\infty\times 1[/itex]. You can write [itex]\psi=\sum_{k=1}^\infty a_k e_k[/itex], where the [itex]e_k[/itex] are basis vectors. The "matrix" of components of [itex]\psi[/itex] relative to the ordered basis [itex]\langle e_i\rangle_{k=1}^\infty[/itex] is [tex]\begin{pmatrix}a_1\\ a_2\\ \vdots\end{pmatrix}[/tex]
 
  • #3
Thank you for your reply.
but if the dimension is inf how can I apply this to, for example, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_equation" , where the dimension of its operator is 4x4.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
Black Integra said:
Thank you for your reply.
but if the dimension is inf how can I apply this to, for example, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_equation" , where the dimension of its operator is 4x4.
You wouldn't. If you're talking about a theory in which a solution to the classical Dirac equation is considered an ([itex]\mathbb R^4[/itex]-valued) wavefunction, then you could write [tex]\psi=\sum_{\mu=0}^3\sum_{k=1}^\infty a^\mu_k e_\mu u_k[/tex] where the [itex]e_\mu[/itex] are the standard basis vectors for the space of 4×1 matrices, and the [itex]u_k[/itex] are members of an orthonormal basis for the space of square-integrable functions. I suppose you could arrange the [itex]a^\mu_k[/itex] into another infinite column matrix if you want to, but I think that would be a rather pointless thing to do.

Anyway, the theory that interprets a classical Dirac field as a wavefunction is obsolete. The Dirac equation is still used in quantum field theory, but now the Dirac field (the solution to the equation) isn't a wavefunction. It's an operator.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
Wow, that's very interesting.
Thanks for those information!
 

1. What is a wave function matrix?

A wave function matrix is a mathematical representation of a quantum system, where each element of the matrix corresponds to a possible state of the system.

2. How is a wave function matrix different from a regular matrix?

A wave function matrix is different from a regular matrix in that it represents a quantum system and its properties, while a regular matrix represents any set of numbers or variables.

3. How can a wave function be represented as a matrix?

A wave function can be represented as a matrix by assigning each possible state of the system to a row or column in the matrix, and using complex numbers to represent the probability amplitudes for each state.

4. What is the significance of the elements in a wave function matrix?

The elements in a wave function matrix represent the probability amplitudes for each state of the quantum system, which can be used to calculate the probability of the system being in a particular state.

5. How can a wave function matrix be used to interpret quantum systems?

A wave function matrix can be used to interpret quantum systems by providing a mathematical description of the possible states and their probabilities, allowing for predictions to be made about the behavior of the system.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
615
Replies
1
Views
623
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
689
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
61
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
966
Back
Top