Unique solution to an arbitrary monotonic non-linear system

In summary, the vector field f:\mathbb{R}^n\oplus\mathbb{R}^m \to \mathbb{R}^n has the following properties:-The jacobian matrix of f wrt to the first argument \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}: \mathbb{R}^n\oplus\mathbb{R}^m \to \mathbb{R}^{n\times n} is a lower triangular matrix with negative elements on the main diagonal, for all input argument values. This assumption is equivalent to the statement that each f_i is strictly decreasing wrt to x_i for i = 1 \dots n
  • #1
dmytro
7
0
Quick version:

I have a vector field [itex]f:\mathbb{R}^n\oplus\mathbb{R}^m \to \mathbb{R}^n[/itex] of two arguments [itex]x \in \mathbb{R}^n, y \in \mathbb{R}^m[/itex], which has the following properties:

  1. The jacobian matrix of [itex]f[/itex] wrt to the first argument [itex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}: \mathbb{R}^n\oplus\mathbb{R}^m \to \mathbb{R}^{n\times n}[/itex] is a lower triangular matrix with negative elements on the main diagonal, for all input argument values. This assumption is equivalent to the statement that each [itex]f_i[/itex] is strictly decreasing wrt to [itex]x_i[/itex] for [itex]i = 1 \dots n[/itex]
  2. (optional, if it helps, but I should probably relax it later to monotonous w.r.t to y) [itex]f[/itex] is linear in the second argument, i.e. [itex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial y} = \text{const}[/itex] is a constant [itex]n\times m[/itex] matrix. Or, even, [itex]f(x,y)=g(x)+Gy[/itex], where [itex]G[/itex] is some (known) matrix
  3. [itex]f[/itex] is sufficiently differentiable, nice and all

The question is, given the assumptions above, and setting [itex]y=W^Tx[/itex], is there any hope of finding some constrains on the matrix [itex]W \in \mathbb{R}^{n\times m}[/itex], such that the equation [itex]f(x, W^Tx)=0[/itex] has a unique solution?

Some details:

I need this to show that a linear feedback control stabilizes my system, that's where [itex]W^Tx[/itex] comes from. This question arose as a generalization to a 1d case, which has a nice solution, as described below. However, I don't know which tools can I use to study the generalized problem.

In 1D case, i.e. [itex]n = m=1[/itex], we have the following:

  • Let be of the form [itex]f(x, y) = g(x) + \gamma y[/itex]
  • then [itex]f(x, wx) = 0 \implies \gamma wx = -g(x)[/itex]
  • g(x) is strictly decreasing (according to 1.), then a sufficient condition for [itex]g(x) + \gamma w x = 0[/itex] to have a unique root is that [itex]\gamma w x[/itex] is strictly decreasing, i.e. [itex]\gamma w < 0[/itex]

So, had I asked this question in 1D, the answer would be like "the system has unique solution for all [itex]w[/itex], such that [itex]\gamma w < 0[/itex] holds". I was hoping to get smth like that for the general case, but with no luck so far. I'd also be grateful is someone points me to the suitable mathematical apparatus to figure it out.

One more thing: for stable fixed points, the original question can be equivalently restated as: find constrains on [itex]W[/itex], such that the matrix

[tex]
\frac{\partial}{\partial x}[f(x, W^Tx)] = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}W^T
[/tex]

has only negative eigenvalues, for all [itex]x[/itex]. The equivalence can be shown using the dynamical systems theory. So an answer to this question is as welcome as to the original one
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
edit:

[itex]f:\mathbb{R}^n\oplus\mathbb{R}^m \to \mathbb{R}^n[/itex] should be [itex]f:\mathbb{R}^n\times\mathbb{R}^m \to \mathbb{R}^n[/itex]

[itex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}: \mathbb{R}^n\oplus\mathbb{R}^m \to \mathbb{R}^{n\times n}[/itex] should be [itex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}: \mathbb{R}^n\times\mathbb{R}^m \to \mathbb{R}^{n\times n}[/itex]
 
Last edited:
  • #3
One thought is to see if the Banach fixed point theorem helps.. Let [itex] T [/itex] to be the mapping of [itex] \mathbb{R}^n [/itex] into itself defined by [itex] T(x) = f(x, W^T x) [/itex].

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banach_fixed-point_theorem

Correction: Let [itex] T [/itex] to be the mapping of [itex] \mathbb{R}^n [/itex] into itself defined by [itex] T(x) = f(x, W^T x) + x [/itex]. so the fixed point will be relevant to the solution of your equation.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Stephen Tashi said:
One thought is to see if the Banach fixed point theorem helps
Thanks for the clues. I can't seem to figure out how to make use of that theorem though...

However, I found a solution for a special case of [itex]W[/itex]. If one picks [itex]W^T[/itex] with only first non-zero column, then the product [itex]\Gamma = \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}W^T[/itex] also has only first column not equal to zero, that is, a special case of a triangular matrix. Therefore, to make sure that the full derivative of [itex]f[/itex] is a stable triangular matrix, one should only require that the [itex](1, 1)[/itex] elememnt of [itex]\Gamma[/itex] is always negative, that is:
[tex]sign(W_{1i}) = -sign(\frac{\partial}{\partial y_i}f_1(x, y)), \forall i, x, y[/tex]
This condition is easy to fulfill, if one assumes that [itex]f_1[/itex] is monotonic in the second argument.

For the full-rank [itex]W[/itex], the question is still open, and that's exactly the case I need :(
 
Last edited:
  • #5


I find this problem to be quite interesting and challenging. The fact that the jacobian matrix of f with respect to x is lower triangular with negative elements on the main diagonal suggests that the system is strictly decreasing in each component of x. This is a strong assumption and gives us a lot of information about the behavior of the system.

Additionally, the linearity of f with respect to y is also a useful property that can potentially simplify the problem. However, the question of finding constraints on the matrix W to ensure a unique solution to the equation f(x, W^Tx)=0 is not an easy one. It requires a deep understanding of the system and its dynamics.

One approach to solving this problem could be to use techniques from nonlinear control theory, such as Lyapunov stability analysis, to analyze the stability of the system. This could potentially lead to finding constraints on W that ensure a unique solution.

Another approach could be to use numerical methods to solve the equation f(x, W^Tx)=0 for different values of W and see if there are any patterns or relationships between the solutions and the matrix W. This could give us some insight into the problem and potentially lead to finding constraints on W.

In conclusion, this is a complex and interesting problem that requires a combination of theoretical and numerical approaches to solve. I would recommend consulting with experts in nonlinear control theory and dynamical systems to get more insights and possible solutions to this problem.
 

1. What is a unique solution to an arbitrary monotonic non-linear system?

A unique solution to an arbitrary monotonic non-linear system refers to a solution that is the only possible solution for the given system. This means that there are no other solutions that satisfy the system's equations and constraints.

2. How is a unique solution determined for an arbitrary monotonic non-linear system?

A unique solution for an arbitrary monotonic non-linear system can be determined through various methods such as substitution, elimination, or graphical methods. These methods involve manipulating the equations of the system to find the values of the variables that satisfy all the equations and constraints.

3. Can a unique solution exist for an arbitrary monotonic non-linear system?

Yes, a unique solution can exist for an arbitrary monotonic non-linear system. However, this is not always the case as some systems may have no solution or multiple solutions. The existence of a unique solution depends on the equations and constraints of the system.

4. What are the advantages of having a unique solution to an arbitrary monotonic non-linear system?

Having a unique solution to an arbitrary monotonic non-linear system is advantageous as it provides a definitive answer to the problem at hand. This eliminates any ambiguity and allows for a clear understanding of the system's behavior. Additionally, a unique solution can be used to make accurate predictions and decisions.

5. Are there any limitations to finding a unique solution to an arbitrary monotonic non-linear system?

Yes, there are limitations to finding a unique solution to an arbitrary monotonic non-linear system. These limitations include the complexity of the system and the accuracy of the solution obtained. Some systems may require iterative methods or numerical approximations to find a unique solution, which may not always be completely accurate.

Similar threads

  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
2
Replies
41
Views
3K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
2
Replies
52
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
647
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
4
Views
877
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
4
Views
985
Back
Top