Is every subspace of a connected space connected?

In summary, the conversation discusses whether every subspace of a connected space is connected. The answer depends on the definition of "space" - if it is a general topological space, then the answer is no, but if it is a topological vector space, then the answer is yes. A counterexample is given using the real line. The importance of understanding definitions and thinking about them is emphasized. The conversation also touches on the philosophy of mathematical education.
  • #1
quantum123
306
1
Is every subspace of a connected space connected?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What exactly do you mean by "space"- general topological space or topological vector space?

If you mean general topological space, the answer is obviously "no". Any subset of a topological space is a subspace with the inherited topology. A non-connected subset of a connected space with the inherited topology would be a non-connected space.
 
  • #3
Subspace I mean a subset with the induced subspace topology of a topological space (X,T).
 
  • #4
For a counterexample, take the real line, and the subset of the real line formed by removing a point.
 
  • #5
Or just take a pair of points. That's a disconnected subset too.
 
  • #6
this is the most clueless question I've heard yet. reveals a complete lack of understanding of connectedness. presumably the questioner is learning by reading some worthless book with no examples or useful explanations at all.

(I waS IN exactly this boat when i was beginning topology, after hearing continuity defined as inverse image of opens are open. that is totally useless in understanding homeomorphisms. after that i still thought a sphere might be homeomorphic to a torus.)
 
Last edited:
  • #7
There are no stupid questions, only stupid answers. :tongue:
 
  • #8
mathwonk said:
this is the most clueless question I've heard yet. reveals a complete lack of understanding of connectedness. presumably the questioner is learning by reading some worthless book with no examples or useful explanations at all.

(I waS IN exactly this boat when i was beginning topology, after hearing continuity defined as inverse image of opens are open. that is totally useless in understanding homeomorphisms. after that i still thought a sphere might be homeomorphic to a torus.)

Isn't that the definition of continuity? What is your definition? You mean without torus and sphere there would be no such thing as continuity?
 
  • #9
StatusX said:
For a counterexample, take the real line, and the subset of the real line formed by removing a point.
Yes, the subset you mentioned is not connected with the usual or euclidean topology. But what about the induced or subspace topology where every open set is defined to be an intersection of that particular subset and a particular open set in the usual topology?
 
  • #10
You think it suddenly ceases to be disconnected? Take two open sets in the 'usual' topology that are disjoint and disconnect R\{0}. Each is open in the subspace topology by the very definition *you* wrote down.

Mathwonk's point was that sometimes it pays if you think about things. Whilst we always tell people that the first thing to do is check they know the definitions, the second thing is to see if they understand the definitions. This is different. This you do by playing with things and seeing what happens. It's good that you've learned the definitions, but the fact you had to make that last post asking that question indicates you need to think about the definitions some more for yourself, and in particular to actually use them and apply them to some questions.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
We are talking about topology and mathematics here. So is it better to stick to the topic and not talk about something else like for example, me?
 
  • #12
quantum123 said:
Yes, the subset you mentioned is not connected with the usual or euclidean topology. But what about the induced or subspace topology where every open set is defined to be an intersection of that particular subset and a particular open set in the usual topology?

He gave a counter-example and which there are many!

Once you give a counter-example, the story of the question is done. If you want to ask a new one, go ahead, but that may require a different answer.

Oh, and by the way, he did use the subspace topology you're talking about.
 
  • #13
quantum123 said:
We are talking about topology and mathematics here.

We're talking about your understanding of topology.

So is it better to stick to the topic and not talk about something else like for example, me?

I can imagine it is not particularly pleasant, I apologise. Let me put it this way: there is a common philosophy amongst many mathematical educators that it is better to teach a man to fish than to give him a fish. It is more important to find out why, when given a counter-example, you didn't see it was a counter example and check the details rather than to give you more counter-examples.
 

1. What does it mean for a subspace to be connected?

A subspace is considered connected if it cannot be separated into two disjoint non-empty open sets. This means that there are no gaps or holes in the subspace, and every point in the subspace is connected to every other point by a continuous path.

2. Is every subspace of a connected space also connected?

Yes, if a space is connected, then all of its subspaces are also connected. This is because any separation of a subspace would also create a separation in the larger connected space, which is not possible.

3. Can a subspace be connected even if the larger space is not connected?

Yes, a subspace can still be connected even if the larger space is not connected. This is because the subspace may not have the same characteristics or topological properties as the larger space, and therefore cannot be compared in the same way.

4. What if a subspace is connected but the larger space is not?

In this case, the subspace is considered a connected component of the larger space. This means that the subspace is connected, but it is not connected to any other component of the larger space.

5. How is the concept of connected subspaces relevant in science?

The concept of connected subspaces is relevant in various scientific fields, such as physics, chemistry, and biology. It helps in understanding the structure and behavior of continuous systems, such as molecules, cells, and ecosystems. It also has applications in data analysis, image processing, and network theory.

Similar threads

  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
14
Views
324
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
600
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
8
Views
375
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
819
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
635
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
6
Views
710
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
7
Views
908
  • General Math
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top