How to Increase RPM without decreasing Torque?

In summary, the conversation is about a design engineer seeking help to increase the RPM of a rotating shaft while maintaining a torque of 17400N-m. However, this would require a power output of 4000KW, which is not possible according to the first law of thermodynamics. The engineer has been asked to either increase the torque, increase the RPM without decreasing torque, or quit. However, the other engineers in the conversation have stated that it is not physically possible to increase the power output without increasing the torque. The engineer is considering changing the design constraints in order to achieve the desired power output.
  • #1
kashyap
3
1
Hi,

I am not a mechanical engineer but an aeronautical engineer. Hence I am very poor with Mechanics & request for your help.

I am working on design which produces approximately 17,400N-m of Torque at 25RPM. I want to maintain this Torque but increase the RPM to 1500. Is that possible? I am planning to use a Gear Train to multiply the RPM but will that decrease the Torque as well?

Thanks in advance for your help.

Regards

Kashyap
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Urm, is this an engine?

Power = torque x angular velocity, and this is conserved through a gearbox. So increasing speed, and maintaining torque requires more power; which a gearbox clearly cannot provide.

Perhaps a more thorough description of your quandry would help us to help you?
 
  • #3
Thanks for your reply.

I am working on a design with a desired output of 4000KW. The input is provided by a rotating shaft. I am able to provide a torque of 17400N-m on the shaft & it rotates at 25RPM. But this gives an output of 113KW only. I am stuck here. I have been asked to do either of the 3 -
1. Increase torque (not possible & its a design constraint)
2. Increase RPM without decreasing Torque (this is my thought but not sure how)
3. Quit (I am not going to quit)

The reason I was thinking about the 2nd point is because of the this link - https://www.physicsforums.com/archive/index.php/t-67032.html
Not sure though if I got it correctly.

Please help. I am open to make changes if you suggest any to resolve this problem.

Regards

Kashyap
 
  • Like
Likes Terry Robinson
  • #4
You cannot convert 113 kW into 4000 kW with a gearbox. Period. Your output power must always be lower than your input power: that's the first law of thermodynamics and it is non-negotiable.

Simply put, you need mechanical motive device with a 4000 kW power output. That would be Option 4: Change your design constraints.

The other thread you linked does not in any way suggest you can increase rpm without decreasing torque. It is a standard reduction gear application: decreasing rpm while increasing torque.
 
  • #5
Thanks for your reply. I agree with you on this front & considering Option 4. I will work on this & might be back for more help from soon
 
  • #6
Hey, if you figure out how to turn 45.6kW into 4000kW there's a job waiting for you here. I'm a motion control engineer and write software and design hardware to operate mechatronics and robotics for industrial machinery.

Free power (sic. free energy) has long been the fevered dreams of the "perpetual motion" niche. Their attempts to break the unrelenting and surly bonds of the law of conservation of energy (in a closed system) has yet failed. If someone has given you an impossible job, it is up to you to accurately report the physical restrictions of the universe.

Too often I am given a task that is not simply "difficult" but literally and physically impossible. I carefully research the reason why, and present it as clearly as possible (being sure not to insult anyone). As engineers we are subject to the impossible whims of managers and administrators. Some of them believe that breaking the intractable laws of physics requires nothing more than a "firmware update."

It's part of your job as an engineer to relate this information in a timely manner. If you persist in an impossible task you waste your time, and by proxy, the company's money. I suggest you consider this the final word on the matter.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
kashyap said:
I am able to provide a torque of 17400N-m on the shaft & it rotates at 25RPM. But this gives an output of 113KW only.
I get 290 Watt

I would hope that all here are capable of unit analysis.
 
  • #8
Where does 113kW come from anyway? And 290W for that matter?

Power (in Watts) = Torque (in Newton-meters) multiplied by angular speed (rads per second).

It's about 45kW.
 
  • #9
Actually, yeah... I get 45.6kW.
 
  • #10
290 Watts is what you get when you ask Wolfram|Alpha the wrong question.
 
  • #11
generally if you want to increase torque it will be done on zccount speed but ageneral rule ther isn`t amplify of power if you can make money from no thing then you can convert 45 kw to 4000 kw
 
  • #12
What?
 
  • #13
kashyap said:
Thanks for your reply.

I am working on a design with a desired output of 4000KW. The input is provided by a rotating shaft. I am able to provide a torque of 17400N-m on the shaft & it rotates at 25RPM. But this gives an output of 113KW only. I am stuck here. I have been asked to do either of the 3 -
1. Increase torque (not possible & its a design constraint)
2. Increase RPM without decreasing Torque (this is my thought but not sure how)
3. Quit (I am not going to quit)

...

I think the only way to increase the power from 45.6kW to 4000kW is to increase the torque, that's because a gearbox works based on the difference between gear diameters. So for example, the force on gear one times the radius of that gear equals the force on gear two times the radius of gear two. Thus the force remains the same while the torque actually changes. If you can't up the torque it's not physically possible because it means (according to my very quick calculations) using those 17400Nm of torque to produce 2195 RPM out of thin air.
 

1. How does increasing the RPM affect torque?

When increasing the RPM (revolutions per minute) of an engine, the torque (rotational force) will generally decrease. This is because the power output of the engine is spread over a larger number of revolutions, reducing the force at each individual revolution.

2. What are some methods for increasing RPM without losing torque?

There are a few ways to increase RPM without sacrificing torque. One method is to increase the engine's compression ratio, which allows for more efficient combustion and can result in increased power output at higher RPMs. Another option is to use forced induction, such as a turbocharger or supercharger, which can provide a boost in power without sacrificing torque.

3. Can modifying the fuel system help increase RPM without sacrificing torque?

Yes, upgrading the fuel system can help increase RPM without compromising torque. This can be achieved by using higher octane fuel or adding a fuel injection system, which can provide a more precise and controlled delivery of fuel to the engine.

4. Is it possible to increase RPM and torque simultaneously?

While it is difficult to increase both RPM and torque at the same time, it is not impossible. This can be achieved by making significant modifications to the engine, such as increasing the engine's displacement or using advanced engine tuning techniques.

5. What are some potential risks of increasing RPM without decreasing torque?

One potential risk of increasing RPM without decreasing torque is putting additional strain on the engine, which can lead to overheating and potential engine damage. It can also result in reduced fuel efficiency and increased wear and tear on the engine components. It is important to carefully consider the trade-offs and consult with a professional before making modifications to increase RPM without sacrificing torque.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Mechanical Engineering
2
Replies
49
Views
54K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
4
Replies
107
Views
36K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top