Infinite wire carrying current, magnetic field

In summary, the electric potential is V = IR, where I is the current, and the magnetic field is B = mu_0(I)/2pi(r). To find the change in radius dr, an infinite wire is used that goes into the paper and is part of a larger circle. To find the path that equals r_net, the user needs to find the path that is a part of a small inner circle and a larger circle.
  • #1
scholio
160
0

Homework Statement



an infinite wire carries current into the paper as shown. (see attach.) compute [integral(B dI)] along the closed path indicated

Homework Equations



electric potential V = IR where I is current, R is resistance

magnetic field B = mu_0(I)/2pi(r) = mu_0(I)/dr where mu_0 is constant = 4pi*10^-7, r is radius, I is current, dr is change in radius

The Attempt at a Solution



the path is basically a part of a small inner circle of radius r_1, and 'part' of a larger circle of radius r_2. to find the change in radius dr, i need to find the path which equals r_net ( see 2nd attach).

does the fact that the current is carried into the paper just affect the sign of the current? or does it have a greater affect?

i'm not sure whether dr = path length, if it is not, to find dr am i supposed to just do (r_2 - r_1 = dr)?

how do i determine change in current I, dI? am i missing the correct equation?
 

Attachments

  • wirepath.JPG
    wirepath.JPG
    9 KB · Views: 476
  • radii.JPG
    radii.JPG
    11.3 KB · Views: 427
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
couldn't edit the original post, i am supposed to get " mu_0(I) " for the final answer, where mu_0 is a constant = 4pi*10^-7, and I is the current(a constant)

*******problem is to solve [integral(Bdl)] not [integral(BdI)], path length not current --> thanks calef/mindscrape
 
Last edited:
  • #3
dr is the infinitesimal path length. This is a hairy problem if you aren't familiar with vector calculus.

Are you using Biot-Savart?
 
  • #4
err, are you sure you aren't supposed to compute Bdl, as in, the integral of Magnetic Field with respect to differential length (as opposed to current?)?

Cause if so, all this problem is doing is trying to illustrate ampere's law.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
calef, i think you may be right, i think i should actually be solving for [integral(Bdl)] as opposed to [integral(BdI)].

even still, i may have written/used the wrong terms on the attachment to indicate path length, i used radii. anyways, did i determine the path length correctly? i used simple geometry.

do i just treat the magnetic field B as a constant, take it out of the integral, what would be by integrating limits?

no once I've found the total path,
 
  • #6
scholio said:
calef, i think you may be right, i think i should actually be solving for [integral(Bdl)] as opposed to [integral(BdI)].

even still, i may have written/used the wrong terms on the attachment to indicate path length, i used radii. anyways, did i determine the path length correctly? i used simple geometry.

do i just treat the magnetic field B as a constant, take it out of the integral, what would be by integrating limits?

no once I've found the total path,

Well, I think you're finding too much, actually. The point of ampere's law is that the quantity I*mu_0 is independent of the path you take for the integral. So no matter what your path is, be it a circle, or that horrible geometric mess they've given you, the integral of magnetic field with respect to length along that path will always be the current within the loop times mu_0.
 
  • #7
Ampere's law? What kind of loop would you use?

I'm pretty sure he is stuck with Biot-Savart and what seems like not enough information.

Edit:Ohhh, I see what the problem is getting at. Yeah sure, it follows from Maxwell's equations that [itex]\int \mathbf{B} \cdot d\mathbf{l} = \mu_0 I[/itex]. But as far as finding B goes... oof.
 
  • #8
Mindscrape said:
Ampere's law? What kind of loop would you use?

I'm pretty sure he is stuck with Biot-Savart and what seems like not enough information.

Edit:Ohhh, I see what the problem is getting at. Yeah sure, it follows from Maxwell's equations that [itex]\int \mathbf{B} \cdot d\mathbf{l} = \mu_0 I[/itex]. But as far as finding B goes... oof.

Doesn't matter, all that matters is that the loop is closed.
 
  • #9
calef said:
Doesn't matter, all that matters is that the loop is closed.

Quite so! As a suggestion to the OP, consider that Ampere's Law is a magnetic analog to Gauss' Law. There, the flux integral, integral(E · dA) is given by the charge enclosed by the surface divided by epsilon_0 . It makes no difference how lumpy the surface is, as long as it is closed and continuous; you don't need to know the total surface area or the shape of the surface. Similarly here, integral(B · dL) itself will not depend on the arclength of the closed path or its shape.

(Tip for "psyching out" problems in introductory physics courses: if the problem posed seems to have a portion which would require incredibly complicated calculation, you are generally being asked to recall and apply a straightforward concept...)
 
  • #10
ohhh, so basically i am just solving maxwell's eq, so do i just use the net length on the attachment i came up with and just multiply it by mu_0 = 4pi*10^-7, to get the answer I'm looking for?
 
  • #11
The point is that you don't have to solve anything, it is already solved for you. You just recite the equation

[tex]\int \mathbf{B} \cdot d\mathbf{l} = \mu_0 I[/tex]
 

What is an infinite wire carrying current?

An infinite wire carrying current is a hypothetical situation in which a wire extending infinitely in both directions is carrying a flow of electric current.

How does an infinite wire carrying current create a magnetic field?

According to the right-hand rule, the direction of the magnetic field created by an infinite wire carrying current is perpendicular to the wire and is in the direction of your curled fingers when your thumb points in the direction of the current flow.

What is the strength of the magnetic field created by an infinite wire carrying current?

The strength of the magnetic field created by an infinite wire carrying current decreases as the distance from the wire increases. It is inversely proportional to the distance from the wire.

Is the magnetic field created by an infinite wire carrying current uniform?

No, the magnetic field created by an infinite wire carrying current is not uniform. It is stronger closer to the wire and decreases as you move farther away from the wire.

Can the magnetic field of an infinite wire carrying current be affected by other magnetic fields?

Yes, the magnetic field created by an infinite wire carrying current can be affected by other magnetic fields. It can interact with and be influenced by other magnetic fields in its surrounding environment.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
847
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
334
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
257
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
43
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
924
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
944
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
320
Back
Top