Can't finish a Laplace Initial Value Problem.

In summary: Y(s)So, it looks like you're doing it correctly. Just make sure you factor the numerator and denominator of the completed square correctly.
  • #1
chief10
78
0
I've had to take diff eqtns now and I'm trying to get my head around Laplace again.. it's been a while. I can't seem to transition to the simplest step of partial fractions, my denominators are tough to figure out.

If someone could point me to the next step that'd be great!

Thanks a lot guys and girls.

What I have is in the link below, I'd embed it but it's too big and will mess with the formatting of the page.

http://i46.tinypic.com/2z4aaup.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
my suggestion would be to use partial fractions on the first term only. The second term can be forced to resemble sin. 5 divided by (s^2+2s+5) completing the square on the denominator gives (S+2)^2+1 which when inversed gives you 5e^-2tsint I believe? then it's just a matter of the first term..

I believe I haven't checked it more than once may have made a mistake but it definitely seems that it would be easiest to handle each term on its own. Maybe the first one can also be forced to resemble either sin or cosine without using partial fractions
 
  • #3
chief10 said:
I've had to take diff eqtns now and I'm trying to get my head around Laplace again.. it's been a while. I can't seem to transition to the simplest step of partial fractions, my denominators are tough to figure out.
If someone could point me to the next step that'd be great!
Thanks a lot guys and girls.
What I have is in the link below, I'd embed it but it's too big and will mess with the formatting of the page.
http://i46.tinypic.com/2z4aaup.png

Hi !

The Laplace transform of exp(-at)sin(bt) is b/((s+a)²+b²)
The Laplace transform of exp(-at)cos(bt) is (s+a)/((s+a)²+b²)
So, you have to rewrite Y(s) on the form :
Y(s) = C1/s + C2* b/((s+a)²+b²)+ C3* (s+a)/((s+a)²+b²)
First, compute a and b, then C1, C2 and C3
 
  • #4
FOIWATER said:
my suggestion would be to use partial fractions on the first term only. The second term can be forced to resemble sin. 5 divided by (s^2+2s+5) completing the square on the denominator gives (S+2)^2+1 which when inversed gives you 5e^-2tsint I believe? then it's just a matter of the first term..

I believe I haven't checked it more than once may have made a mistake but it definitely seems that it would be easiest to handle each term on its own. Maybe the first one can also be forced to resemble either sin or cosine without using partial fractions

Do you mean [5(e^-2) x tsint]? you're not raising the sine function are you, just multiplying it by the exp?
The second component appears to be solvable in that sense, however your completion of the square I believe is incorrect. You can't simplify the denominator to my knowledge.

That specific Laplace transform wasn't on my given formula sheet, that's a bummer.

Hmmm the first term is a little trickier! any ideas on that one?

10/s(s^2+2s+5)

transforming that is quite a task..
 
Last edited:
  • #5
JJacquelin said:
Hi !

The Laplace transform of exp(-at)sin(bt) is b/((s+a)²+b²)
The Laplace transform of exp(-at)cos(bt) is (s+a)/((s+a)²+b²)
So, you have to rewrite Y(s) on the form :
Y(s) = C1/s + C2* b/((s+a)²+b²)+ C3* (s+a)/((s+a)²+b²)
First, compute a and b, then C1, C2 and C3

in the C3 function, could I ask why you put (s+a) in the numerator? thanks mate
 
  • #6
I mean s²+2s+5 = (s+1)²+2² = (s+a)²+b², then a=1 and b=2
 
  • #7
JJacquelin said:
I mean s²+2s+5 = (s+1)²+2² = (s+a)²+b², then a=1 and b=2

how does s²+2s+5 = (s+1)²+2²?

that's not right is it?


while you're here though, if you could take a look at my other thread involving Laplace that'd be great!

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=639980
 
  • #8
chief10 said:
how does s²+2s+5 = (s+1)²+2²?
that's not right is it?
Can you develop (s+1)²+2² = ?
 
  • #9
JJacquelin said:
Can you develop (s+1)²+2² = ?

excuse me it's 3am here in Aus, lol.. my bad.. got it

do you mind elaborating on the partial fraction a little if you don't mind?

i've drawn up the initial equation you gave me below, how does the completed square factor in here?

http://i49.tinypic.com/w39cj.jpgBTW, I just ran it through Matlab and this is the answer it gave me to the ODE, seems like we're on the right track.

(3*sin(2*t))/(2*exp(t)) - (2*cos(2*t))/exp(t) + 2
 
Last edited:
  • #10
chief10 said:
i've drawn up the initial equation you gave me below, how does the completed square factor in here?
http://i49.tinypic.com/w39cj.jpg
That's OK. Then you have to compute C1, C2, C3
Rewrite all with only one denominator s((s+a)²+b²) and compare to Y(s) also rewriten with the same denominator.
 
  • #11
JJacquelin said:
That's OK. Then you have to compute C1, C2, C3
Rewrite all with only one denominator s((s+a)²+b²) and compare to Y(s) also rewriten with the same denominator.

Alright I think I get what you're saying, i posted a link below.

http://i48.tinypic.com/2zits9l.jpg

I won't post back for a few hours now though because it's 4:15am here so i'll head off to bed now. I really appreciate all of your help. Hopefully you'll be here tomorrow to help me too mate :)

I await your reply! thanks bud.
 
  • #12
oh wow sorry - yeah i completed that square wrong - should have been as you said, sorry. so, sin2t instead of t right?

And yeah as you said it's not raised to the power it's a multiplication
 
  • #13
any ideas on which step I should take next?
 
  • #15
wait so are you saying to equate both of the Y(s) equations?
 
  • #16
Of course, obviously, YES ! :zzz:
 
  • #17
lol alright, i'll do that and post back in a bit
 
  • #18
but then how do you solve that? I'm a little lost?

i tried it out but I've got brackets and fractions everywhere? sorry to seem a little out of touch here.
 
  • #19
Do you have the same denominator for ALL fractions ?
 
  • #20
JJacquelin said:
Do you have the same denominator for ALL fractions ?

nope

in this one: http://i46.tinypic.com/2z4aaup.png - The Y(s) function has two different denominators so you can't cancel them out on both sides if you equated the Y(s) equations.

i mean even if you did equate them and cancel them out, does one side just become 10+5? (15)
 
  • #21
<< The Y(s) function has two different denominators >> ! ! !
Oh my God ! Can't you make all fractions with the same denominator s((s+1)²+4) just like you did before for the three other fractions ?
 
  • #22
JJacquelin said:
<< The Y(s) function has two different denominators >> ! ! !
Oh my God ! Can't you make all fractions with the same denominator s((s+1)²+4) just like you did before for the three other fractions ?

yeah I thought that's what you meant, no issue

lol relax man, it's confusing over the net with just text and stuff, i appreciate the help, i'll post back in a bit.
 
  • #23
JJacquelin said:
<< The Y(s) function has two different denominators >> ! ! !
Oh my God ! Can't you make all fractions with the same denominator s((s+1)²+4) just like you did before for the three other fractions ?

thanks a lot mate I think I'm pretty sure I worked it out! with your help!

much appreciated dude, I've attached it below

http://i48.tinypic.com/2ep3t3c.jpg
 
  • #24
chief10 said:
thanks a lot mate I think I'm pretty sure I worked it out! with your help!

much appreciated dude, I've attached it below

http://i48.tinypic.com/2ep3t3c.jpg

You are right to be pretty sure ! :approve:
 
  • #25
haha :)
 

1. Why is it important to be able to finish a Laplace Initial Value Problem?

Solving Laplace Initial Value Problems is crucial in many areas of science and engineering, including electrical engineering, physics, and mechanical engineering. These problems help us understand the behavior of systems over time and allow us to make predictions and design solutions.

2. What makes solving Laplace Initial Value Problems challenging?

Laplace Initial Value Problems involve complex mathematical calculations and require a thorough understanding of differential equations. They also often involve real-world scenarios that may not have straightforward solutions, making the problem-solving process more difficult.

3. How do you approach solving a Laplace Initial Value Problem?

The first step in solving a Laplace Initial Value Problem is to set up the problem by writing out the given information and identifying the initial conditions. Then, you can use various techniques such as partial fraction decomposition and inverse Laplace transforms to solve for the unknown function.

4. What are the common mistakes when solving Laplace Initial Value Problems?

One common mistake is not properly setting up the problem or identifying the initial conditions. Another mistake is not using the correct techniques or making errors in the mathematical calculations. It is also easy to make mistakes when working with complex numbers and inverse Laplace transforms.

5. How can I improve my ability to solve Laplace Initial Value Problems?

Practice is key in improving your skills in solving Laplace Initial Value Problems. Start with simpler problems and gradually work your way up to more complex ones. It is also helpful to review fundamental concepts and techniques, and to seek help from a teacher or tutor if needed.

Similar threads

  • Differential Equations
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Calculus
Replies
1
Views
905
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top