Quick P. Energy Derivation Question


by Angry Citizen
Tags: derivation, energy
Angry Citizen
Angry Citizen is offline
#1
Mar6-12, 08:41 PM
P: 867
When deriving the work-potential energy theorem, my book states that dV (derivative of the potential energy) is equal to the negative of Fdr without a corresponding explanation. What is the justification behind the negative sign?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists design quantum switches which can be activated by single photons
'Dressed' laser aimed at clouds may be key to inducing rain, lightning
Higher-order nonlinear optical processes observed using the SACLA X-ray free-electron laser
pabloenigma
pabloenigma is offline
#2
Mar6-12, 09:06 PM
P: 51
As such,there is no explanation,its about definition.

The important thing is,for conservative forces,you can define a potential.Even if you had define dV=Fdr,you would have a consistent theory.The fact that dV=-Fdr,and not Fdr,is not logic,its convention.

In essence,it means that,when positive work is done by the field forces on body,its potential energy decreases,and kinetic energy increases.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Just a quick question on the derivation of energy Special & General Relativity 2
Gravitational Potential Energy Derivation question? Introductory Physics Homework 7
Silly question, derivation of energy Classical Physics 4
Quick derivation question Introductory Physics Homework 0
Quick Hello Then Question About Energy Introductory Physics Homework 1