Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

In summary: RCIC consists of a series of pumps, valves, and manifolds that allow coolant to be circulated around the reactor pressure vessel in the event of a loss of the main feedwater supply.In summary, the earthquake and tsunami may have caused a loss of coolant at the Fukushima Daiichi NPP, which could lead to a meltdown. The system for cooling the reactor core is designed to kick in in the event of a loss of feedwater, and fortunately this appears not to have happened yet.
  • #5,706
MadderDoc said:
I am sure you have noticed that a part of the metal roof structure is missing on the roof in the south end. That's because in the course of the blast it ended up in the yard between units 3 and 4. Fortunately its attachment to the south edge of the roof has been that much retained that one can see that one end has been torn apart, while the other end appears to have been affected by a similar heat-damage what we are talking about effect. Are we to assume three separate fire/blast events, two on the roof and one in the yard?

Detail from one end of the roof structure landed in the 3/4 yard:
20110320_down_4-3a_detail.jpg

A few pages back there has been some discussion about where the refueling crane (FHM = Fuel Handling Machine?) of unit 3 has gone, and if it could be below the big crane...

Looking at this image, I noticed that brownish-greenish structure with something that looks like a bent metal pole sticking out in the middle-left part of the image. There is some gray debris on its lower part, likely concrete pieces. Is it possible that this object is the unit 3 fuel crane that has maybe been ejected from the service floor in the unit 3 explosion? Would the size and its current position make any sense? The brownish color might be rust, and maybe we are seeing the bottom of the crane.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #5,707
~kujala~ said:
Sorry if this has been discussed earlier.

France's IRSN has calculated that SFP 4 would lose max 115 tons per day.


http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/fukushima_accident_inf129.html

MIT has calculated that even after 1 year the decay heat for units 2 & 3 after scram would be 5 MW per unit. Units 2 & 3 contain the same amount of reactor fuel assemblies that SFP 4 has spent/partially fuel assemblies (4 months old).
http://mitnse.com/2011/03/16/what-is-decay-heat/

(MIT is stating that their calculation is conservative, though.)

How was this 71 tons calculated? And can we be absolutely sure about it?

I don't know if this has been mentioned, but what about the new fuel assemblies stored in each SFP
Reactor 1 SFP contains 100 new fuel assemblies
Reactor 2 SFP contains 28 new fuel assemblies
Reactor 3 SFP contains 52 new fuel assemblies
Reactor 4 SFP contains 204 new fuel assemblies
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5,709
ranchorelexo said:
I don't know if this has been mentioned, but what about the new fuel assemblies stored in each SFP
Reactor 1 SFP contains 100 new fuel assemblies
Reactor 2 SFP contains 28 new fuel assemblies
Reactor 3 SFP contains 52 new fuel assemblies
Reactor 4 SFP contains 204 new fuel assemblies

Please cite your source for this information.
 
  • #5,710
Did somebody knew that tepco seem to have vented through the stack on this timelapse video at a moment indicated as the 13th of March at around 14h00 (see at t=around 0:30' on this video)



There may be (but I'm not sure) an other small venting at t=0:29' (13th of March at 10h00) and previously one at t=0:24' which is indicated as the 12th of March at 15h00.

I believed that there was no possibility to vent directly to the outside through the stack because this had to be actuated through a valved requiring electricity and there was total blackout at the plant at this date after the tsunami?

That's the reason that was presented by some on this forum to explain why they were venting manually inside the buildings, leading to the H2 explosions.

Any explanation?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5,712
MiceAndMen said:
Please cite your source for this information.

Status of the fuel as of march 11, 2011. Theres a table about half way through the pdf.

http://www.nisa.meti.go.jp/english/files/en20110406-1-1.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5,713
jlduh said:
Hi please clarify your post, the link is towards a missing video and probably not "live"!

The live cam is here:
http://www.tepco.co.jp/nu/f1-np/camera/
Sorry! Try this site:
http://lucaswhitefieldhixson.com/fukushima-i-nuke-plant-live-video-feed-tbs

Not the still cam. Live video. You can see planes fly over and the change to night. Seems to be the real deal.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5,714
The second link is not working either...
 
  • #5,715
More analysis and data around the release of the SPEEDI simulations and measurements:

http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/05/japanese-government-finally-divulges.html

On Toshizo Kosako adviser's resignation, especially based upon the fact that children may have received to much radiation per government decisions:

http://menknowpause.fooyoh.com/news/6075624
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704167404576294343071646176.html

http://ecocentric.blogs.time.com/2011/05/03/japan-are-kids-being-exposed-to-too-much-radiation/
http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/news/20110503p2g00m0dm017000c.html

Pressure is increasing, outside of the reactors...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5,716
:frown: Am I doing something wrong or are they just not loading for you?
I've got one more:
http://news.tbs.co.jp/newsi_sp/youtube_live/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5,717
jlduh said:
The second link is not working either...
I can see the streams at both URLs without a problem (using google chrome) - both urls are the same stream.

Translation on the TBS/JNN youtube channel says:
Live camera JNN Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant (Live)
Live streamed on 2 May, two thousand and eleven by Tbsnewsi
--hmm should be 4 May now

I couldn't absolutely confirm it's a live feed, but the weather appears similar between the tepco still camera and this feed. TBS/JNN appears to be a legit news organization in Japan.

I'm seeing significant white smoke/steam coming intermittently from units 2, 3 and 4. I'm really not sure this is unusual considering the large amounts of water that people here have projected must be steaming off.

Hmm they've zoomed out now to include units 5 and 6, so it's much harder to see the smoke/steam. Now they're zooming again...

Also find the feed here:
http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/05/fukushima-i-nuke-plant-live-video-feed.html
 
Last edited:
  • #5,718
Good, I was starting to worry. :) When it zooms in, there are flashes on the building on the far right, supposedly no. 4. They've been appearing and disappearing in different places, so it seems to be fire. There was some on the pile of rubble building next to it as well, but it was ground level so looks like they got it out? Hard to say for sure at the distance though.

StrangeBeauty said:
I can see the streams at both URLs without a problem (using google chrome) - both urls are the same stream.

Translation on the TBS/JNN youtube channel says:
Live camera JNN Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant (Live)
Live streamed on 2 May, two thousand and eleven by Tbsnewsi
--hmm should be 4 May now

I couldn't absolutely confirm it's a live feed, but the weather appears similar between the tepco still camera and this feed. TBS/JNN appears to be a legit news organization in Japan.

I'm seeing significant white smoke/steam coming intermittently from units 2, 3 and 4. I'm really not sure this is unusual considering the large amounts of water that people here have projected must be steaming off.

Hmm they've zoomed out now to include units 5 and 6, so it's much harder to see the smoke/steam. Now they're zooming again...

Also find the feed here:
http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/05/fukushima-i-nuke-plant-live-video-feed.html
 
  • #5,719
well sorry, all the links return a message "This video is not available". tried it with Chromium and Firefox with the same result, don't know why...

Maybe a restriction of rights for certain areas in the world? (I'm from France). Anybody else have trouble or only me?

I'm going to check if this is not a problem with Flash Player for 64bits system (Windows 7) causing the trouble.

EDIT: updated to the latest flash player release but no improvement. Tried Chromium, Explorer, Opera, Safari and Firefox... Quite strange.
 
Last edited:
  • #5,720
jlduh said:
well sorry, all the links return a message "This video is not available". tried it with Chromium and Firefox with the same result, don't know why...

Maybe a restriction of rights for certain areas in the world? (I'm from France). Anybody else have trouble or only me?

Just keep refreshing. It's taken other people several attempts to connect as well. They are all the same feed, but not sure if any site will work better than the others. I hope it's not a restriction issue...
 
  • #5,721
Zallia said:
Have you all seen the live cam?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ck_KEILBLlU&feature=player_embedded

Looks like fires breaking out in #3 and #4.

jlduh said:
Hi please clarify your post, the link is towards a missing video and probably not "live"!

The live cam is here:
http://www.tepco.co.jp/nu/f1-np/camera/

@Zallia thanks for that link, This is exactly the same point from which explosions 1 and 3 where recorded from and this confirms my believe that the position is a fixed point weather cam

@jlduh this is live cam the tepco site is an hourly snapshot

a lot of steam can still be observed and the bird song is rather pleasing
AntonL said:
[PLAIN]http://k.min.us/inr320.JPGThe videos of the explosion, in my opinion, were taken from this point http://watchizu.gsi.go.jp/watchizu.html?b=372016&l=1405540 which is 13km from fukushima and at an elevation of 582metres. This point also seems to be TV or radio station as a mast and a building is visible on google earth.

Using Google Earth one can draw site lines and check features like the high voltage line towers (vertical lines in the middle of the foreground)
[PLAIN]http://k.min.us/inr1us.JPG[/QUOTE]

below reactor 2 corner is a white vertical line (a mast in the landscape), both on live cam and explosion video above
[PLAIN]http://k.min.us/iniKbg.JPG
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5,722
Well that's a pity i cannot get the live feed...

I just found this page with extracted pictures trying to show what may be going on on reactor 4:

http://lucaswhitefieldhixson.com/fukushima-daiichi-reactor-4-fire-may-3-2011
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5,723
jlduh said:
Well that's a pity i cannot get the live feed...

I just found this page with extracted pictures trying to show what may be going on on reactor 4:

http://lucaswhitefieldhixson.com/fukushima-daiichi-reactor-4-fire-may-3-2011

I cannot agree with lucaswhitefieldhixson to a fire in reactor 4, what he refers to as water streams moving side to side could just as well and most likely be mobile cranes clearing rubble.

These live pictures confirm that a lot watre is being boilded as a lot of steam is visible
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5,724
Look just off-center of the right-hand building on the ground floor. There's an orangeish-yellow flashing that wasn't there earlier. Seems to change size. Do you think that's fire or could it be something else? I think the May 2 is probably just the date when they started the streaming and that's why it's not current.

And you're welcome. :) Since most everyone seems content to ignore this problem entirely, it's nice that there are a few places where people are trying to obtain and spread as much information as possible. Seems best to share info when possible.

AntonL said:
@Zallia thanks for that link, This is exactly the same point from which explosions 1 and 3 where recorded from and this confirms my believe that the position is a fixed point weather cam

I cannot agree with lucaswhitefieldhixson to a fire in reactor 4, what he refers to as water streams moving side to side could just as well and most likely be mobile cranes clearing rubble.

These live pictures confirm that a lot watre is being boilded as a lot of steam is visible
 
  • #5,725
ranchorelexo said:
Status of the fuel as of march 11, 2011. Theres a table about half way through the pdf.

http://www.nisa.meti.go.jp/english/files/en20110406-1-1.pdf

Yes, the NISA reports have been discussed here. The number of new and used fuel assemblies has also been discussed. The new fuel that has not been activated gives off less heat than the used fuel.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5,726
I was following the live video link, which worked for me, and found more links...

http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/05/highly-radioactive-sewage-sludge-in.html"
Fukushima, May 1 (Jiji Press)--High levels of radioactive cesium have been found in sewage sludge in Fukushima Prefecture, northeastern Japan, the prefectural government said Sunday.

The sludge at a treatment center in Koriyama had 26,400 becquerels of radioactive cesium per kilogram. Slag made by reducing the volume of sewage sludge had 334,000 becquerels per kilogram.

http://jen.jiji.com/jc/eng?g=eco&k=2011050300567"
The installation of the ducts, slated for Thursday, will be done by four pairs of plant workers. They are required to finish the job quickly because a high radiation level of 1,120 millisieverts per hour was detected at one place in the reactor building in a recent unmanned survey.
Newer news links after the article.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5,727
jlduh said:
More analysis and data around the release of the SPEEDI simulations and measurements:
there is a hudge disparity between the document found there
http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/saigaijohou/syousai/1305747.htm
and the one found there http://www.nsc.go.jp/mext_speedi/

Translation help is needed to know exactly what we are reading about
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5,728
ranchorelexo said:
I don't know if this has been mentioned, but what about the new fuel assemblies stored in each SFP
Reactor 1 SFP contains 100 new fuel assemblies
Reactor 2 SFP contains 28 new fuel assemblies
Reactor 3 SFP contains 52 new fuel assemblies
Reactor 4 SFP contains 204 new fuel assemblies
Ok, so there was fresh enriched uranium in the pool.

Gundersen's theory of a prompt criticality as the cause of the unit 3 mushroom cloud is a possibility.
 
  • #5,729
MiceAndMen said:
Please cite your source for this information.

http://www.nisa.meti.go.jp/english/files/en20110406-1-1.pdf (page 36)
New fuel is heat negligable.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5,730
Why they put fresh fuel in pool ? It don't need to be in water until it is loaded into core, but anyway, I didnt saw any place in reactor building where they could store fresh fuel... I don't know if it is normal in bwr reactors to keep new fuel in pool...
 
  • #5,731
Zallia said:
Have you all seen the live cam?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ck_KEILBLlU&feature=player_embedded

Looks like fires breaking out in #3 and #4.

That's a nice find that is.
looks as if it's a day or two behind according to some text on the screen... would be nice to know.
And yes it looks like it's from the same vantage point as the explosion vids... my concern is the wind direction... It looks on shore now.
 
  • #5,732
New fuel is put in the pool for safety, but also because it can only be put in the reactor one way: by being picked up from the pool, moved through a trough, underwater, between the pool and the reactor and inserted, while still underwater, in the reactor core.
 
  • #5,733
~kujala~ said:
Sorry if this has been discussed earlier.

France's IRSN has calculated that SFP 4 would lose max 115 tons per day.


http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/fukushima_accident_inf129.html

How was this 71 tons calculated? And can we be absolutely sure about it?

71 tons is calculated from estimating heat generation from SFP4 to 1,600 kCal/hour / 2MW. Was estimated by Atomic Energy Society of Japan (AESJ), source if here (http://www.aesj.or.jp/en/release/chousacom_EN_01_110418.pdf).

Both are estimates ...
 
  • #5,734
triumph61 said:
At 27. Tepco said the Pool is leaking. At 28. Tepco said the Pool is NOT leaking.

Do you have links towards this leaking / then not leaking announcements?

triumph61 said:
Whats happend? Did they find the leaked? Perhaps they also restore the cooling?

Perhaps, but most probably they would have made announcements on these good news, don't you think?
 
  • #5,735
SteveElbows said:
I will probably still try to keep somewhat of an open mind about this data and what it means, just in case there is some factor we are missing, or for example if they have already tried to convert the raw skimmer water temperature into a pool temperature before publishing the data. I doubt this but its just one example of things I cannot be sure about.

We would need to know what is the exact shape of the FPC skimmer surge tank in unit 2 to check, based on its level and announced temperature. If of cylinder shape, then it seems to me it may be the deduced (calculated) temperature of the SFP.

They could also estimate temperature of SFP thanks to infrared aerial measurements, or also a thermocouple attached to the concrete truck arm.
 
  • #5,736
Radiation levels in unit 1 "far higher than tepco expected"

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/japan/8491624/Robot-sends-back-footage-from-inside-Fukushima-plant.html

I'll try to correct that link
 
  • #5,737
~kujala~ said:
http://www.nisa.meti.go.jp/english/files/en20110406-1-1.pdf (page 36)
New fuel is heat negligable.

Yes, until it goes critical.

Criticality is supposed to be prevented by boron in Boral sheets. Aluminum is stable in water only when the water is at neutral pH.

So when cooling gets lost, the spent fuel is boiling off the water, fuel rods get exposed and really hot, zircalloy is reacting with water, H2 is developed, and the water becomes alkaline (I think). This eats away Boral really fast in hot water. The boral sheets drop to the bottom of the pool.

Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong. If aluminum can dissolve in water when it is alkaline or acidic, it is just bound to happen somewhere sometime. From a safety point of view, the choice of aluminum as a matrix for boron is just incredibly stupid.

But the company says: http://www.ceradyneboron.com/products/nuclear-power/neutron-absorbers/boral/
"currently used at seventy nuclear power plants and eleven research reactors worldwide"
"It is well suited to many nuclear applications including storage of spent nuclear fuel, "
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5,738
jpquantin said:
Do you have links towards this leaking / then not leaking announcements?

April 27th:
TEPCO: Water may be leaking from No. 4 reactor fuel pool
http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/27_09.html

April 28th
TEPCO: Water isn't leaking from No. 4 reactor pool
http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/28_05.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5,739
jim hardy said:
<..>
i am curious about the orange flash at beginning of #3 video, and if you find the right youtube there was one in first fraction of a second of unit 1 as well. <..> Does anybody know of a frame by frame?

You can have a peek here:
http://gyldengrisgaard.dk/fuku_expl1/
http://gyldengrisgaard.dk/fuku_expl3/

(I would be happy for someone else to mirror this stuff
I do not really have the bandwidth to serve properly)

And is there anything to be gleaned from the burst of orange flame?
Orange is the color of burning salt but they weren't spraying seawater into the pools yet, as best i could find.

I don't think much can be gleaned from the color of the explosions. Hydrogen does burn ideally, like in a test tube, with an almost invisible flame, however in a real world hydrogen explosion, other stuff, e.g. dust, soot, will be present or be produced and be heated by it, producing a yellowish or reddish glow.
see:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5,740
The attached capture shows smoke over unit 2, 3 and 4.

I would go for steam - all same color for all units.

Also I do not see the red arm of the concrete truck near unit 4, but maybe this is too small to be visible ?
 

Attachments

  • Unit 2-3-4 smoke May 4th 0624 PM JPT.PNG
    Unit 2-3-4 smoke May 4th 0624 PM JPT.PNG
    33.7 KB · Views: 489

Similar threads

  • Nuclear Engineering
2
Replies
41
Views
3K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
12
Views
46K
  • Nuclear Engineering
51
Replies
2K
Views
417K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
17K
  • Nuclear Engineering
22
Replies
763
Views
258K
  • Nuclear Engineering
2
Replies
38
Views
14K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
4
Views
11K
Back
Top