Calculating the Angle at which a Hanging Ring Will Rise with Two Sliding Beads

  • Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Ring
In summary, a ring with mass M hangs from a thread and two beads with mass m slide on it without friction. When the beads are released simultaneously from the top of the ring and slide down opposite sides, it can be shown that the ring will start to rise if m is greater than 3M/2. The angle at which this occurs can be found using energy considerations and the equation for normal force, and it is equal to cos^-1(1/4). Taking the derivative of the normal force with respect to the angle and finding the maximum value of N_y, it can be shown that m=4M satisfies the condition for the ring to start rising. Some minor errors were found in the conversation, but
  • #1
MathematicalPhysicist
Gold Member
4,699
371
a ring of mass M hangs from a thread, and two beads of mass m slide on it without friction.
the beads are released simultaneously from the top of the ring and slide down opposite sides.
show that the ring will start to rise if m>3M/2, and find the angle at which this occurs.
what i did:
i got the displacement x=R(1-cos(a))
by energies we have 2mgR=(2R-x)mg+mv^2/2
so v^2=2xg
now, i think because it rises, the increase in the normal force equals the change of forces, because both beads have a centripatl force acting on them, then the change in normal force is (2mv^2/R)cos(a) (by the third law of Newton, action reaction force), so i think to myself this increase should be greater than Mg, but from here I am stuck (if I am even right on this claim), can someone point where I am wrong if I am wrong, and how to correct this, becuase i don't know from here to conclude that m>3M/2 and the angle when this occurs.

thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In my oppinion I think you have the right idea. The energy of a bead can be written with the center of the circle as 0 for the starting point with theta being the angle between the vertical and the bead. The Y component of the normal forces must equal the weight of the ring it seems. We can use the energy eqn to subsitute into the centripetal acceleration. This is a long problem, I am not sure where to go from here. I don't formally study physics, but this was my interpretation.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
[tex]E_i=mgR[/tex]

[tex]E_f=mgR*cos\Theta +\frac{mv^2}{2}[/tex]

[tex]E=mgR=mgR*cos\Theta +\frac{mv^2}{2}[/tex]

[tex]m\frac{v^2}{R}=2mg(1-cos\Theta)[/tex]

[tex]\sum F=ma_c=m\frac{v^2}{r}=N-mg*(-cos\Theta )=N+mg*cos\Theta [/tex]

[tex]N=m\frac{v^2}{r}-mg*cos\Theta [/tex]

[tex]N_y=-N*cos\Theta [/tex]

[tex]Mg=2*N_y=-2N*cos\Theta =-2(m\frac{v^2}{r}-mg*cos\Theta )*cos\Theta [/tex]

[tex]Mg=-2(2mg(1-cos\Theta)-mg*cos\Theta )*cos\Theta [/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #4
first off, i spotted an error:
it should be 2mgR cause the displacement is 2R, and i don't understand your decompsition of N, i don't think you did it right, cause N in here is directed upwards in the direction opposite to the weight of the individual bead.
 
  • #5
loop quantum gravity said:
first off, i spotted an error:
it should be 2mgR cause the displacement is 2R, and i don't understand your decompsition of N, i don't think you did it right, cause N in here is directed upwards in the direction opposite to the weight of the individual bead.

I took the center to be 0 so at the top it is R and at the bottum is negative R.

N is perpendicular to the plane it is resting on. So only at the top and bottum is N only along the y component.

I would like to draw a free body diagram but my boss could walk in at any minute.

I think there is a mistake with the negative sign at the end.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
then how from this i conclude that m must satisfy m>3M/2 in order to rise?
btw, ithink it should be:
N=mv^2/R+mgcos(a)
and N_y=mgcos(a).
 
  • #7
I still think it should be:

N=mv^2/R-mgcos(a)

I might have made mistakes previously. This is how I think of the problem. A ball rolling off a spherical surface eventually leaves the surface. The ring pulls it back down. So the normal force is pointing to the center of the circle. A component of gravity is pulling it to the center also and solving that we get the eqn for N.

N_y=N*cos(a) = [mv^2/R-mg*cos(a)]*cos(a)

According to energy considerations:

mv^2/R=mg(1-cos(a))

Then

N_y=[mg(1-cos(a))-mg*cos(a)]*cos(a) = mg*cos(a)*[1-2*cos(a)]

Note that for values bigger than pi/6 N_y is negative. This makes sense because it is being pulled down. The equal but opposite force on the ring is upward.

So for the whole system we have:

-2*mg*cos(a)*[1-2*cos(a)] - Mg=0

Take the derivative of N_y with respect the angle a. Find the angle for the maximun N_y. Plug that angle into the eqn that relates N_y and Mg
 
Last edited:
  • #8
why should i take here a derivative?
the N force is perpendicular to the tangent of circle, and the radial force points to the centre of the ring, the radial force is directed in the same direction as the radial force, i don't understand why you think it's directed inwards to the centre of the circle.
if i take the derivative i get -2mg(-sin(a)+4cos(a)sin(a))=0
and i get that cos(a)=1/4 and when i plug it in the equation, i get:
-2m*1/4(1-1/2)-M=0
m=4M which is different than what i need to prove.
 
  • #9
loop quantum gravity said:
if i take the derivative i get -2mg(-sin(a)+4cos(a)sin(a))=0

Try taking the derivative again, only this time be a little more carefull. The normal force is perpendicular to the plane. In this case the ring is sometimes making it not fall straight down do to gravity and at other times keeping the bead from flying off. In any case it is either pointing away from or towards the center.
 
  • #10
i think i took the derivative from this equation:-2*mg*cos(a)*[1-2*cos(a)] - Mg=0 as i should have taken, if we know that (cos(a))'=-sin(a).
unless you would kindly correct me, or show me where I am wrong here?
 
  • #11
so what is wrong with my derivatives?
 
  • #12
I'm trying to solve this problem now, is the solution above right? I found something with square root 3:(
 
  • #13
NotMrX said:
According to energy considerations:

mv^2/R=mg(1-cos(a))

It should be (1/2)mv^2/R = mg(1-cos(a)).

The rest seems OK.
 
  • #14
Thanks, I've solved it, I realized that I forgot a - for the rings' mass:) it is ok now:)
 

1. What is the concept of "Two beads and a ring"?

The concept of "Two beads and a ring" is a problem in mathematics and physics that involves the movement of two beads on a ring. The beads are connected by a string or wire that passes through the center of the ring, and the challenge is to determine the path of the beads as they move around the ring.

2. What is the history of "Two beads and a ring"?

The problem of "Two beads and a ring" has a long history, dating back to ancient Greek mathematicians such as Archimedes and Apollonius. It has also been studied by many famous scientists, including Galileo and Newton.

3. What is the significance of "Two beads and a ring" in science?

The problem of "Two beads and a ring" has been used to illustrate and test concepts in physics, such as circular motion and conservation of energy. It has also been used as a mathematical puzzle and challenge, with various solutions and approaches proposed over the years.

4. What are some real-world applications of "Two beads and a ring"?

While the problem of "Two beads and a ring" may seem abstract, it has real-world applications in fields such as engineering and robotics. For example, it can be used to design and optimize mechanisms for moving objects along a circular path.

5. What are some resources for learning more about "Two beads and a ring"?

There are many books and articles that discuss the problem of "Two beads and a ring" in depth, including its history, solutions, and applications. Online resources, such as math and physics forums, also provide a platform for discussing and exploring different approaches to this problem.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
184
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
839
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
908
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
25
Views
9K
Back
Top