Proving an Equivalence Relation: Tips & Examples

In summary, to prove that a given relation is an equivalence relation, it must satisfy the three properties of reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. To show this, you would need to show that these properties hold true for the relation by using specific examples and logical reasoning. In the example given, the relation R(z,d) is an equivalence relation if and only if d= f(z), which would imply that R(z,d) is equality.
  • #1
helpm3pl3ase
79
0
Iam not clear on how to prove a equivalence relation? I know that is has to have three properties reflexivity, symmetry, and transtivity, but I am unsure how to check.

For example Iam given f is a function from z to d. R(z,d) = binary relation

How do I prove that R(z,d) is a equivalence relation?? Iam unclear on how to approach this and work with the properties?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
A relation ~ on a set A, is an equivalence relation if

Let x,y,z belong to A

i) x~x (reflexive)
ii)If x~y then y~x (symmetric)
iii)if x~y and y~z then x~z (transitive)

To show that a given relation is an equivalence relation you would need to show that these 3 properties hold true for the relation.
 
  • #3
As both you and d_leet said, you would prove R is an equivalence relation by showing that each of the conditions holds. How you would do that depends strongly on what R is!

"For example Iam given f is a function from z to d. R(z,d) = binary relation"
How is R(z, d) related to f? Do you mean R(z,d) if and only if d= f(z)?

Rather than saying "f is a function from z to d" it would be better to say "f is a function on set A" (with z and d members of set A).

If, indeed R(z,d) if and only if d= f(z), then you must prove:
1. Reflexive. That f(z)= z so R(z,z) for every member of set A.
2. Symmetric. If d= f(z), then z= f(d).
3. Reflexive. If x= f(z) and y= f(x), then y= f(z).

From 2, it looks like we are saying that f must be invertible. If that is the case, then for any d in A, there is only one x, such that d= f(x). Combining that with 1, we clearly must have f(x)= x for any member of A. That would mean that R(d,x) is equality: d= x.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. What is an equivalence relation?

An equivalence relation is a mathematical concept that describes a relationship between elements of a set. It is a binary relation that is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.

2. How can an equivalence relation be proven?

An equivalence relation can be proven by showing that it satisfies the three properties of reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. This can be done by providing examples and counterexamples, or by using logical reasoning and proofs.

3. What are some tips for proving an equivalence relation?

Some tips for proving an equivalence relation include: clearly defining the set and relation, providing examples and counterexamples, using logical reasoning and proofs, and checking that the relation satisfies the three properties of reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity.

4. What are some examples of equivalence relations?

Some examples of equivalence relations include: "is equal to" for numbers, "is congruent to" for geometric figures, "is similar to" for shapes, and "is isomorphic to" for mathematical structures. These relations all satisfy the three properties of reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity.

5. Can an equivalence relation be proven in different ways?

Yes, an equivalence relation can be proven in different ways depending on the context and the specific relation being studied. Some common methods include using examples and counterexamples, using logical reasoning and proofs, and using properties of the relation to show that it satisfies the three properties of reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
866
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
714
Back
Top