Response time of photodiodes

In summary, the conversation discusses the use of photodiodes to measure the intensity of fast light pulses. The speaker is looking for a way to measure the number of photons hitting the photodiode, rather than the instantaneous current. Bob S suggests using a charge integrator circuit, which will give a voltage output proportional to the total number of photons hitting the photodiode. He also recommends using a fast photodiode rather than a slow one, and provides a simple charge integrator circuit as an example. The speaker asks for further references or resources to learn more about this topic.
  • #1
TChi
17
0
Hello everybody,

When I came up to my problem, I searched all over our forum but I could not find the appropriate solution. Would you please help me:

1) http://home.sandiego.edu/~ekim/photodiode/pdtech.html#resp is the description about the response time of photodiodes and I can find the similar information in the figure 3 of page 2 of this document: http://www.centronic.co.uk/downloads/3-1-6%20photodiode%20theory.pdf
However, this happens only when the duration of the radiation of the light is much higher than the response time of the photodiodes. So my question is: what happens if the light radiation time is much shorter than the response time of the photodiodes? For example: for a fast photodiode with the response time of ~ 1ns, if my laser pulse has the duration of ~ 1ps so what will be the shape of the current generated by the photodiode? Will the linearity being kept the same? If it is possible, would you please send me some documents or tell me how can I figure it out.

2) In order to measure the intensity of such a fast light pulse, which one is better: using a fast photodiode or using a slow photodiode? Do you have any idea of the manufacturer of good slow-photodiodes?

Thank you for reading my post and please leave me some comments.

Regards,
Tran Trung
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi Tran-

If the light pulse is much faster than the photodiode response (primarily transit time spread), then the photodiode slows down the signal rise time. You can also stretch out the pulse duration (integrate the charge) by paralleling the photodiode output with a high value discharge resistor in parallel with a capacitor.

Most of my experience is with fast vacuum photodiodes, such as the RCA 935. These photodiodes have fractional-nanosecond risetimes. Using such a RC integration circuit permits directly measuring the photodiode charge from the 1 ps pulse on the capacitor. Don't use a slow photodiode.

Bob S
 
  • #3
Hi Bob S,
Actually, the original pulse duration in my case is 30fs, the 1ps value is the stretched one. Even if we use the photodiodes as you suggested, do you think that we can gauge the light intensity by the photodiode current?

Please let me know, I am not quite clear here. What decides the response time of one photodiode? And would you tell me why I should not use the slow photodiode. IMO, the slow photodiode is too slow, therefore the light pulse is finished while the electrical signal is rising. When the light stops, will the electrical signal continue to rise (inertial property of electrical circuit) or stop rising (will we lose part of the rising as it is supposed to rise)? Is there any other reason that I should not use the slow photodiode? Please teach me and I am happy to hear from you.
Thank you very much.
 
  • #4
If the photodiode circuit integrates (on a capacitor) the total charge released in the pulse, the voltage output will be proportional to the charge (number of photons) and not the instantaneous current (number of photons per ps). I believe you want to measure the number of photons and not photons per ps. In the case of the vacuum photodiode, the geometry of the cathode, and the transit time spread of the electrons arriving at the anode determine the risetime. I have seen some parallel-plate vacuum photodiodes with a semitransparent (wire screen) anode, but not in recent years. Remember that the photodiode (especially a vacuum photodiode) is an ideal current source. As long as the discharge (or charge recombination) time of the charge stored in the photodiode circuit is long relative to the digitization time, the information will be accurately recorded.

Bob S
 
  • #5
Dear Bob S,

Thank you for your messages. You were definitely right. What I want is to measure the number of photons that come to the photodiode. However, I am lack of knowledge in this specific topic. Would you please give a reference or any typical electric circuit to get into reality. I want to make it done.
Thanks in advance.
 
  • #6
TChi said:
Thank you for your messages. You were definitely right. What I want is to measure the number of photons that come to the photodiode. However, I am lack of knowledge in this specific topic. Would you please give a reference or any typical electric circuit to get into reality. I want to make it done.
The total charge Q out of the photodiode is proportional to the total number of photons hitting the cathode (vacuum photodiode) or Si PIN semiconductor. depleted depth. If the photodiode is output paralleled with a capacitor C, the risetime of the voltage is proportional to the laser pulse area integral to time t, and the voltage V stored on the capacitor is equal to Q/C. This final voltage is proportional to the area of the laser pulse. The decay time of this voltage is exp[-t/RC], where R is the discharge resistor in parallel with C. This discharge time should be long enough to digitize it before the voltage decays more than a few %, or it is stored in an an analog sample-and-hold circuit.

Bob S
 
  • #7
Hi Bob S,

Thank you so much. What you said is exactly what I am trying to understand. Please do me one more favor: please give a reference list or a name of a book or whatever you think that I can read and learn more about this. I have only the fundamentals of electronics. Please just give me the names, I can do a research about them.

Regards.
 
  • #8
Here is a simple charge integrator for very fast pulses from a current source, like a vacuum photodiode (see attachment).

The plot shows the input current pulse (red, right vertical scale), and the output voltage pulse (black, left scale). The horizontal scale is 10 microseconds long. The light pulse (and charge pulse) occurs at 1 microsecond. A 1-milliamp, 10 nanosecond current pulse (red trace) produces a 10 picocoulomb pulse that immediately gets stored on the 100 pF capacitor (V = QC = 100 mV). The resistor drains off the charge with a 10 microsecond time constant.

Bob S
 

Attachments

  • Photodiode1.jpg
    Photodiode1.jpg
    41.3 KB · Views: 1,395
  • #9
Dear Bob S,

This is very clear and this will be a practical solution for me. However, please tell me again about the references, textbooks or articles, etc that I can gain more knowledge of this field. Since I want to learn and design it myself in case the real problem is different than the one you gave me. For example, this is 1 microsecond pulse, of course I can change the parameters to make it suitable to my experiments but still this is your suggestion. I am quite nervous when I face new and different electrical problems. So please tell me where I can learn about this.

Thanks to your help, I think that my topic is fulfilled. Thank you very much!

Have a nice day,
Regards,
Tran Trung Luu
 
  • #10
This vacuum planar photodiode is the fastest I know of, with risetime measured at ~100 ps or less. It has a semitransparent wire-grid anode biased up to about +5 kV, and a dc-coupled solid cathode plate. Both ITT and Hamamatsu made versions of this. The cathode plate (seen through anode grid in photo) and coaxial ground shield is impedance-matched to 50 ohms, with a UHF connector on the back. I was told once that the ITT version was linear from about 1 nanoamp to about 10 amps for very short pulses. See

http://www.sphere.bc.ca/test/phototubes/ham-r1193-u-03-box.jpg

Bob S
 

1. What is the response time of a photodiode?

The response time of a photodiode refers to the time it takes for the photodiode to detect and convert incoming light into an electrical signal. It is typically measured in nanoseconds (ns) or microseconds (μs).

2. How is the response time of a photodiode measured?

The response time of a photodiode can be measured by applying a light pulse to the photodiode and recording the time it takes for the photodiode to reach a certain percentage (usually 90%) of its maximum output signal.

3. What factors affect the response time of a photodiode?

The response time of a photodiode can be affected by various factors, including the wavelength of light, the size of the photodiode, the material used in the photodiode, and the circuitry used to amplify the signal.

4. Can the response time of a photodiode be improved?

Yes, the response time of a photodiode can be improved by using faster circuitry, reducing the size of the photodiode, and using materials with higher carrier mobility. However, there will always be a limit to the response time due to the physical properties of the photodiode.

5. Why is the response time of a photodiode important?

The response time of a photodiode is important in applications where fast detection of light is necessary, such as in high-speed communication systems, laser rangefinders, and optical sensors. A shorter response time allows for quicker detection and processing of light signals, improving the overall performance of the system.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
960
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
626
Replies
70
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
689
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
16
Views
3K
Back
Top