Is the universal genius necessarily altruistic?

In summary, the conversation discusses the flaws in measuring intelligence through an intelligence quotient (IQ), which is based on fields such as mathematics, sciences, philosophy, and literature. The conversation points out that this definition of intelligence may vary among different species and cultures. Furthermore, the conversation questions the validity of statements made in the article, such as correlations between IQ and culture, thought, and discovery. The speaker expresses concerns about the lack of evidence and research to support these conclusions.
  • #1
lockecole
26
0
http://www.desargues.univ-lyon1.fr/home/lygeros/Mensa/mclassi.html

If so, why?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
HTTP 404 - File not found...

cookiemonster
 
  • #3
"1.1 Intelligence quotient measures intelligence in the following fields : mathematics, sciences, philosophy and literature."

Within the first few lines I noticed this flaw. An alien species may consider philosophy and science to be the same or consider religion and maths to be the same. Or may consider the ability to to repeated tasks for their entire life as intelligence. This varies and intelligence requires a more varied and abstract definition. I assume that the rest of this argument is flawed as a result of this.


Reading fruther I have identified several other mistakes, such as the lack of proof for where these statements came from

4.1 If the intelligence quotient is higher than 150, we note a correlation between intelligence and culture. As if starting from this value the individual were to use an enriched intellectual substrate.

4.2 If the intelligence quotient is higher than 160, we note a correlation between intelligence and thought. As if starting from this value the individual could carry out face : speed of the intelligence and power of the thought.

4.3 If the intelligence quotient is higher than 176, we note a correlation between intelligence and discovery. As if starting from this value the individual tested the need for using his intelligence to discover.


I understand all of this, but when you start to come up with conclusions like

"4.3.2 The spirit of synthesis generates the need for creation."

,

"5.6 If the group reaches critical mass, then it becomes a place of creativity and discovery."

and

"5.7 From an ontological viewpoint, the memory of the group is self-similar. (in the sense of Mandelbrot)"

after I assume that one of your statements are correct without botherring to acquire evidence, I can only be worried that this entire article is using false facts in order to justify some sort of a peculiar motive.

Is there some sort of research bibliography for this article?
 

1. Is there evidence to support the idea that universal geniuses are altruistic?

Yes, there have been numerous studies and observations that suggest that individuals with high levels of intelligence and diverse talents tend to exhibit more altruistic behaviors. This can be seen in their willingness to help others, contribute to society, and use their skills for the greater good.

2. Can a person be a universal genius without being altruistic?

Yes, it is possible for someone to possess a wide range of talents and intellectual abilities without necessarily being altruistic. While altruism may be a common trait among universal geniuses, it is not a prerequisite for being considered one.

3. Are there any notable examples of universal geniuses who were not altruistic?

Yes, there have been individuals throughout history who were considered universal geniuses but also exhibited less-than-altruistic behaviors. For example, Leonardo da Vinci, often seen as the epitome of a universal genius, was known to be quite self-serving and even ruthless in his pursuit of success.

4. Can someone become a universal genius by simply being altruistic?

No, being altruistic alone does not make someone a universal genius. While altruism is a valued trait, it is only one aspect of a person's overall intelligence and abilities. To be considered a universal genius, one must possess a wide range of talents and abilities in various fields.

5. Is there a correlation between altruism and intelligence?

Yes, there is some evidence to suggest that individuals with higher levels of intelligence may be more likely to exhibit altruistic behaviors. This could be due to their ability to understand and empathize with others, as well as their capacity for critical thinking and problem-solving. However, this correlation is not absolute and there are many factors that contribute to a person's level of altruism.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • General Discussion
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
32
Views
9K
Replies
5
Views
410
Replies
32
Views
7K
Back
Top