I don't understand something

  • Thread starter The_Thinker
  • Start date
In summary: Schrödinger's equation, Cauchy-Schwartz's inequality, and commutator of position and momentum operators. The book should have a good introduction of group theory and linear algebra to help understand the concept.In summary, the conversation covers the topics of an electron being a charged particle and producing an electromagnetic wave when in motion, the possibility of detecting its presence and measuring its velocity and position through the use of detectors, and the confusion surrounding the Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle and its application to quantum mechanics. The conversation also delves into the abstract nature of quantum mechanics and the mathematical principles behind it.
  • #1
The_Thinker
146
2
An electron is a charged particle... A time varying electric field produces an electro-magnetic wave perpendicular to it. So when an electron moves, it should also produce an electromagnetic wave perpendicular to it. Isn't this true?

Now if this is true... then should we not be able to detect its presence as it moves around, courtesy this em-wave. Now if we can detect this.. then we should be able to find out its velocity through the shift in frequency and we should be able to detect its position by putting detectors at the right place.

Is this wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Is this thread wondering toward Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle by any chance?
 
  • #3
An electron is a charged particle... A time varying electric field produces an electro-magnetic wave perpendicular to it.

perpendicular to what ?
 
  • #4
Sure, you would get measurements of positions and velocities.

I don't know what you mean by "the position" and "the velocity".
 
  • #5
ah... yeah.. Hootenanny... that's what i was wondering about... if you can measure the position and velocity of the thing... then how does that not go against the uncertainty principle?

and lalbatros:
perpendicular to what ?

perpendicular to the direction of motion of the particle.. that's what i meant...
 
  • #6
The_Thinker said:
ah... yeah.. Hootenanny... that's what i was wondering about... if you can measure the position and velocity of the thing... then how does that not go against the uncertainty principle?
Because the HUP doesn't say anything about whether or not you can measure both the position of momentum of something simultaneously. It does however, say that you cannot measure both to an infinite precision, regardless of the accuracy of your instruments. The HUP is a mathematical principle which come about because the momentum and position operators do not commute.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
so... hmmm... if it is just a mathematical principle... then how is it that people use it as a fundamental principle? I have read and heard of things where they say that the HUP also applies to energy and that is why QM states that a pair of protons and anti-protons can just appear and annihilate each other stating HUP as a reason...

Have I heard or read wrong??
 
  • #8
the uncertainty principle is a mathematical one. It can be derived from Schrodinger's equation (the non-relativistic one... I don't know anything about the relativistic one though) and theories from linear algebra.
 
  • #9
The_Thinker said:
so... hmmm... if it is just a mathematical principle... then how is it that people use it as a fundamental principle? I have read and heard of things where they say that the HUP also applies to energy and that is why QM states that a pair of protons and anti-protons can just appear and annihilate each other stating HUP as a reason...

Have I heard or read wrong??
No, you have heard correctly. Unfortunatly, I don't have time for a full explanation now (I've got spiderman 3 tickets :biggrin:). However, I can say that it isn't just a mathematical principle, it is the fundamental principle that the whole of QM is based on. It is if you like, the basis of the mathematical formalism behind QM.
 
  • #10
cool k man... have fun...

(and do let me know how it is... I've been dying to see it myself...)

K... well ill just read up on it... physics sure is weird... [=(]
 
  • #11
I posit that that core problem is that we do not fully understand the nature of momentum; not that I have explanation.
 
  • #12
even if you have electromagnetic fields to measure, I doubt the wave would have an exact value of momentum, and/or "position" to give you an exact value of the position of the electron itself.

I may be wrong though, as photon obey the relativistic Schrödinger's equation and the commutator of the position and momentum operator might be different. (I'm pretty sure the derivation based on Cauchy-Schwartz's inequality would still be valid though).

quantum mechanics is indeed a very abstract subject... as momentum and position become operators rather than definite numbers... and you can only talk about the average of all the position and the average of all the possible momentum...
 
Last edited:
  • #13
What is the magnitude of the electric field of one electron? Then think about what is the 'change' in the electric field of one electron as a function of its velocity.
 
  • #14
tim_lou said:
even if you have electromagnetic fields to measure, I doubt the wave would have an exact value of momentum, and/or "position" to give you an exact value of the position of the electron itself.

I may be wrong though, as photon obey the relativistic Schrödinger's equation and the commutator of the position and momentum operator might be different. (I'm pretty sure the derivation based on Cauchy-Schwartz's inequality would still be valid though).

quantum mechanics is indeed a very abstract subject... as momentum and position become operators rather than definite numbers... and you can only talk about the average of all the position and the average of all the possible momentum...

ah.. k... tim_lou, wish i knew what all those terms meant.. :rolleyes: I just know a little of what I've read here and there... don't know in depth, will someday when I am done reading all the books... but k... anyway.. thanks for the reply...

but Astronuc
Astronuc said:
What is the magnitude of the electric field of one electron? Then think about what is the 'change' in the electric field of one electron as a function of its velocity.

Im sorry... but i don't quite get what your getting at..
 
  • #15
I was getting at -
then should we not be able to detect its presence as it moves around, courtesy this em-wave. Now if we can detect this..
How does one detect a single electron? What is the sensitivity of the detector? Does the detection process influence the position, energy or momentum of the electron?
 
  • #16
The_Thinker said:
ah.. k... tim_lou, wish i knew what all those terms meant.. :rolleyes: I just know a little of what I've read here and there... don't know in depth, will someday when I am done reading all the books... but k... anyway.. thanks for the reply...

but Astronuc

Neither do I before this semester... If you just grab Griffith's text on quantum mechanics, you'll know most of the terms in one week. :rolleyes:
 
  • #17
The_Thinker said:
An electron is a charged particle... A time varying electric field produces an electro-magnetic wave perpendicular to it. So when an electron moves, it should also produce an electromagnetic wave perpendicular to it. Isn't this true?

Now if this is true... then should we not be able to detect its presence as it moves around, courtesy this em-wave. Now if we can detect this.. then we should be able to find out its velocity through the shift in frequency and we should be able to detect its position by putting detectors at the right place.

Is this wrong?

We can determine both the position and velocity from this wave, but the wave does not have precisely defined properties itself. We can measure the properties of the wave emitted, but there will be some uncertainty to the measurements of the wave (because of it's wave nature, it doesn't have a well defined position, for example). The uncertainty of this measurement translates into an uncertainty about the inferred properties (position, and momentum) of the electron, which will be greater than or equal to the limit expressed by the uncertainty principle.

Astronuc:
This is independant of any particular measuring apparatus, or how that equipment may or may not affect the electron.
 
  • #18
ah... k... will do that surely tim_lou.. :rolleyes:

And.. hmmmm... k, i see your point NeoDevin, but what does the position of the wave have to do with the velocity and the position of the particle? all we need to measure is which angle its coming from to find its velocity (this can be done by measuring the energy we get at a static detector, when the magnitude is highest, then that's the position isn't it?) and the frequency shift to find out the velocity..

Am I right?


Oh... here's another question...
What if in the double slit, if we put this kind of a detector at the 2nd slit, then without doing anything! to the experiment we can measure which slit the electron goes through right...? So... if we did that.. then what pattern do we observe?
 
  • #19
It doesn't matter what properties of the wave you are measuring, your measurements will have uncertainty greater than or equal to a certain amount, which means your inference about the position and velocity of the electron will have uncertainty.
 

What is the best approach to understanding something complex?

The best approach to understanding something complex is to break it down into smaller, more manageable chunks. Start by identifying the main concepts and then try to connect them together to form a bigger picture. It can also be helpful to use visual aids or diagrams to help visualize the information.

How can I improve my critical thinking skills when trying to understand something?

Improving critical thinking skills involves being open-minded and questioning everything. It's important to gather information from multiple sources and evaluate the credibility of each source. Additionally, practicing active listening and asking thoughtful questions can also help improve critical thinking skills.

What should I do if I still don't understand something after trying different approaches?

If you still don't understand something after trying different approaches, it may be helpful to seek assistance from someone who is knowledgeable in the subject. This could be a teacher, mentor, or colleague. Additionally, taking breaks and coming back to the information with a fresh perspective can also be beneficial.

How can I stay motivated when trying to understand something challenging?

Staying motivated when trying to understand something challenging can be difficult, but it's important to remember your end goal and the benefits of gaining a deeper understanding. Setting smaller, achievable goals and rewarding yourself for progress can also help keep motivation high. Additionally, finding a study group or partner can provide support and accountability.

What are some common mistakes people make when trying to understand something?

One common mistake people make when trying to understand something is assuming they already know everything about the topic. It's important to approach new information with an open mind and be willing to learn. Another mistake is not asking questions or seeking clarification when something is unclear. It's also important to avoid relying solely on rote memorization and instead focus on understanding the underlying concepts.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
2
Views
672
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
163
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
546
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
154
Back
Top