Direct products in quantum mechanics

In summary, states that can be written as a direct product lose correlation between each individual state and become independent. This is evident in the example of two protons with angular momentum zero, where the wavefunction can be written as a direct product of position and spin. The ground state for this system is symmetric in position and the next excited state is uncorrelated. This is due to the fact that position and spin are naturally uncorrelated. However, in general, multi-particle states of identical particles are never totally uncorrelated, leading to interesting phenomena such as the non-multiplicativity of position measurements.
  • #1
RedX
970
3
Not every state can be represented by a direct product. Do states that can be written as a direct product have anything special about them?

It seems that states that can be written as a direct product lose correlation between between each individual state. More specifically, stronger than losing correlation, they become independent.

As an example, take two protons with angular momentum zero:

[tex]\psi(r_1,r_2) (|+->-|-+>) [/tex]

which is a direct product of a function of position, and an antisymmetric spin state. By writing the wavefunction as a direct product, you seem to have lost information on whether the spin up proton is near r1 or r2.

Indeed, measurement of position is independent of measurement of spin, and:

[tex]<f(r_1,r_2)g(s_1,s_2)>=<f(r_1,r_2)><g(s_1,s_2)>[/tex]

Going back to the two protons with angular momentum zero, why is it that the ground state is:


[tex]\psi_S(r_1,r_2) (|+->-|-+>) [/tex]

where S stands for symmetric in position. This total expression is definitely antisymmetric which is required for identical fermions. But does the ground state have to be written in a way such that the spin and positions are uncorrelated?

And why is the next excited state:

[tex]\psi_A(r_1,r_2) (spin \;1\; triplet) [/tex]

again uncorrelated?

Does this have to do with the fact that naturally, position doesn't care about spin, that it's not more likely for spin to like the negative x-axis than the positive x axis?

Anyways, are there anymore special properties about states that can be written as direct products?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yeah so this seems right. Take one particle in 2-dimensions, and say you want the two dimensions to be uncorrelated, say:

[tex](|x_1>+\pi|x_2>)\otimes (|y_1>+\lambda|y_2>)[/tex]

The amplitude to be in x2 is pi times more likely than to be in x1, and y2 lambda times more likely than to be in y1.

Multiplying it out:

[tex](|x_1 y_1>+\lambda|x_1 y_2>+\pi |x_2 y_1>+ \pi \lambda |x_2 y_2>[/tex]

So it doesn't matter if you measure x or y first. If you measure x then the wavefunction collapses and finding y2 is still lambda times more likely than finding y1 no matter what you got for x, and if you measure y first then finding x2 is still pi times more likely than x1.

Of course such a direct product state is silly, because usually in an experiment if you know where the particle is in the x-direction, then you have some idea of where it is in the y-direction.

What's interesting is that multi-particle states of identical particles are in general never totally uncorrelated, so you can get weirdness, such as:

[tex]<\psi|X_1|\psi> <\psi|X_2|\psi> \neq <\psi|X_1X_2|\psi> [/tex]

where [tex]|\psi> [/tex] is say [tex]|x_1>\otimes|x_2>+ |x_2>\otimes|x_1>[/tex]

where here X1 measures the x-position of the first particle, and X2 measures the x-position of the second particle. Intuitively they should multiply, and they do, but only if they're distinct particles so that the state can be written as a direct product that is not symmetrized: [tex]|x_1>\otimes|x_2>[/tex], or in general [tex]|\psi_1>\otimes|\psi_2>[/tex]
 

1. What is a direct product in quantum mechanics?

A direct product in quantum mechanics refers to a mathematical operation used to combine two or more quantum systems into a larger system. This allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the behavior and properties of the combined system.

2. How is a direct product represented mathematically?

In quantum mechanics, a direct product is represented by the tensor product symbol, denoted by ⊗. It is used to combine the state vectors of the individual systems, resulting in a composite state vector for the combined system.

3. What are the properties of a direct product?

Some important properties of direct products in quantum mechanics include associativity, distributivity, and the fact that it is not commutative. This means that the order in which the systems are combined matters, and the direct product of two systems may not be the same as the direct product of the same systems in a different order.

4. How is a direct product related to entanglement?

Entanglement is a phenomenon that occurs when two or more quantum systems become correlated in such a way that their individual states are no longer independent. Direct products are often used to describe and understand entangled systems, as they allow for the representation of the combined state of the entangled systems.

5. What are some applications of direct products in quantum mechanics?

Direct products are widely used in areas such as quantum information theory, quantum computing, and quantum cryptography. They provide a powerful tool for analyzing and manipulating complex quantum systems, and their properties are essential for understanding the behavior of entangled states.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
995
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
948
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top