What happen time dilation is videotaped?

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of time dilation and its effects on time perception for individuals moving at different speeds. It is explained that if Person A and Person B are moving at different speeds, their perception of time will be different. The conversation also explores the idea of a live video stream and how it would be affected by time dilation. The conversation concludes that the speed of the object and the distance from Earth play a role in the extent of time dilation and its impact on the live video stream.
  • #1
Ruari1967
3
0
I am sure this question is a lot more elementary than a lot of other posts on here - I am definitely a layman rather than a specialist, so I hope this isn't a problem. My hypothetical question is this:

Person A is standing directly on earth, looking at his watch (so moving at the same speed relative to each other); Person B is moving close to the speed of light away from earth, again, looking at his watch. My layman's knowledge would tell me that time for Person B would slow down and take longer than Person A due to time dilation. However, if Person A was to watch a live video stream of Person B, what would he see? If 5 minutes for Person A takes 15 minutes for person B, there is a 10-minute gap, which I can't explain.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to PF!

There are no gaps. Time is perceived to run slower, making everything appear to happen in slow motion.

...unless the video tape is recorded by a local observer and then mailed, then the video tape looks normal but short.
 
  • #3
Thanks for the reply! How fast would an object have to be going to make this noticeable? Would a 2-hour video on a satellite traveling at 250,000mph would be a few seconds slower for the observer on earth?
 
  • #4
Ruari1967 said:
However, if Person A was to watch a live video stream of Person B, what would he see?
Not sure what you have in mind for a 'live' feed, since it takes time for the signal to reach person A. And as time goes on B gets further away, so the signal takes longer to reach A.
 
  • #5
I suppose Person B doesn't actually have to be traveling away from the Earth - if they were in orbit, the same principal would still apply, wouldn't it?
 
  • #6
The simplest scenario getting at what I think is your question is to imagine an un-accelerating space lab far from any massive body, and a rocket accelerating in a circular path (constant speed but constant acceleration to maintain circular path) around the space lab at high speed. Let's say each broadcasts video of people dancing to the same recording of the same music. Then, the lab will see the rocket video as in slow motion, and the rocket will see the lab video as in rapid motion.

This assumes the rocket people are able to 'ignore' extreme acceleration. Alternatively, the rocket could be moving at high speed on the circle, but at extremely large radius. Then the acceleration could be made small - e.g. 1 g. The larger radius would have no effect on the observed video once each was receiving the others video.

If you pose this on earth, you would have to take into account gravity as well, but this would be a much smaller effect as long as the rocket is going very fast (if the you were talking about a satellite orbiting, the orbital motion and gravitational effect would be of similar order of magnitude; that's why GPS systems have to account for both).
 
  • #7
Ruari1967 said:
I am sure this question is a lot more elementary than a lot of other posts on here - I am definitely a layman rather than a specialist, so I hope this isn't a problem. My hypothetical question is this:

Person A is standing directly on earth, looking at his watch (so moving at the same speed relative to each other); Person B is moving close to the speed of light away from earth, again, looking at his watch. My layman's knowledge would tell me that time for Person B would slow down and take longer than Person A due to time dilation. However, if Person A was to watch a live video stream of Person B, what would he see? If 5 minutes for Person A takes 15 minutes for person B, there is a 10-minute gap, which I can't explain.

Thanks in advance.
If Person B is traveling at 80% of the speed of light away from the Earth and transmits a live video stream of his watch back to earth, Person A would see B's watch running at 1/3 the rate of his own watch. That means that after 15 minutes according to A's watch, he will see B's watch advance by only 5 minutes.

Now according to Special Relativity, in the frame of the earth, Person B's watch is time dilated so that it runs slow at 60% of normal and will have advanced by 9 minutes after 15 minutes goes by on Earth but since it takes time for the "live video stream" to get from B to A traveling at the speed of light an additional 4 minutes is tied up in the transmission. This combined effect of time dilation and increasing transmission time is called Relativistic Doppler in case you want to investigate it further.
 
  • #8
Ruari1967 said:
Thanks for the reply! How fast would an object have to be going to make this noticeable? Would a 2-hour video on a satellite traveling at 250,000mph would be a few seconds slower for the observer on earth?
Yes, at that speed if a "satellite" were traveling directly away from earth, a 2 hour video transmitted back to Earth would take 2.7 seconds longer but this is essentially all caused by the increasing transmission time since the time dilation at this speed is miniscule. 250,000 mph is only 0.037% of light speed.
Ruari1967 said:
I suppose Person B doesn't actually have to be traveling away from the Earth - if they were in orbit, the same principal would still apply, wouldn't it?
No, if Person B or the satellite is in orbit, then the transmission time is not always increasing and so it's just the time dilation that is a factor. The satellite would have to be going much faster than 250,000 mph in order for more than a 1 second slow down in a 2 hour video. At 1% light speed (6,706,152 mph), there is about a third of a second increase. At 2% light speed (13,412,304 mph), the increase is a little less than one and a half seconds.

If Person B were traveling around the Earth at 80% light speed, the time dilation would result in Person A seeing 9 minutes go by on B's watch while 15 minutes goes by on A's watch. Person B would have to be orbiting at 95.3% light speed in order for Person A to see only 5 minutes go by on B's watch while 15 minutes goes by on A's watch.
 
Last edited:

1. What is time dilation?

Time dilation is a phenomenon in which time appears to pass slower for an object or observer that is moving at high speeds or in a strong gravitational field, as predicted by Einstein's theory of relativity.

2. How does time dilation affect videotaping?

When an object or observer is moving at high speeds or in a strong gravitational field, time dilation causes the passing of time to slow down. This means that when videotaping an event, the recording will appear to have a slower playback speed compared to the actual event.

3. Can time dilation be observed in a videotape?

Yes, time dilation can be observed in a videotape. If the event being recorded involves objects or observers moving at high speeds or in a strong gravitational field, the playback of the videotape will show a slower passage of time compared to the actual event.

4. Is time dilation the same as time travel?

No, time dilation and time travel are two different concepts. Time dilation refers to the slowing down of time due to high speeds or strong gravitational fields, while time travel involves the ability to move forward or backward through time.

5. Are there any practical applications of time dilation?

Yes, time dilation has practical applications in various fields such as space travel, where astronauts experience time dilation due to high speeds, and in GPS technology, where time dilation must be accounted for in order for GPS devices to accurately determine location.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
65
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
655
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
34
Views
571
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
658
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
243
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
893
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
522
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
964
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top