Is the Speed of Light a Universal Constant if Time is Measured in Meters?

  • Thread starter matheinste
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Constant
In summary, the conversation discussed the generally accepted definition of the meter as the length of path traveled by light in vacuum during a specific time interval. The quote from Leon Hsu was questioned and deemed as nonsensical, as it stated that the Principle of Relativity implies that the speed of light is only a universal constant if time is measured in units of meters, which is not true in the SI system of units. The conversation also touched on the arbitrary nature of units and how the principle of relativity applies to all systems of units.
  • #1
matheinste
1,068
0
Hello all.

While browsing Lorenz and Poincare Invariance - 100 Years of Relativity, I came across the followng:- -----The meter is the length of path traveled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299,792,458 of a second----- This is, i believe, the generally accepted definition. Then the following-----As stressed by Leon Hsu, "The Principle of Relativity implies that the speed of light is a universal constant if and only if time is measured in units of meters"------

Two questions.

Firstly: Is this a respectable source? It seems authoritative if perhaps somewhat unconventional in that other derivations of Relativity are discussed.

Secondly: If the quote can be taken seriously why should it be the case that the units used for light speed matter?

Thanks for any comments.

Matheinste.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Leon Hsu is wrong. The above definition of the meter came 78 years after Einstein proposed the postulates of relativity.
 
  • #3
thankyou for your response.

DaleSpam said:
Leon Hsu is wrong. The above definition of the meter came 78 years after Einstein proposed the postulates of relativity.

I don't quite see how your second statement is relevant to your first statement.

Could you clarify please.

Matheinste.
 
  • #4
The second is defined as the time it takes a caesium atom to go through a set number of perturbations. Does that really sum up why 1sec=1/3600 of an hour? I'm not sure what you are asking here, we have two constants in this case, the second and the speed of light, yes using that standard the measure is correct.

If 299,792,458 mps^-1 is measured in m and s? Isn't that like asking why ten centimetres should be measured in centimetres?
 
  • #5
matheinste said:
I don't quite see how your second statement is relevant to your first statement.

Could you clarify please.
How could the principle of relativity be limited to a specific definition of the meter when that definition of the meter came 78 years later? It is an absurd assertion.

What would be correct to say is "if you measure time in seconds and distance in meters then the postulate becomes a tautology". But just because it is a tautology in one system of units does not mean that it is not also valid in other systems of units.
 
  • #6
Hello DaleSpam and The Dagda

I think we are at cross purposes. I understand the definitions of the meter and the second and light speed and their intrelationship. I have no problem with them. The definition of the meter was included in the quiote because it seemed appropriate and in context. This is the quote without my comment.

Quote.
The meter is the length of path traveled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299,792,458 of a second. As stressed by Leon Hsu, "The Principle of Relativity implies that the speed of light is a universal constant if and only if time is measured in units of meters"
Unquote

The bit i was worried about is

Quote
As stressed by Leon Hsu, "The Principle of Relativity implies that the speed of light is a universal constant if and only if time is measured in units of meters".
Unquote.

It seems odd to me and i was seeking clarification. It may be making a point that is beyond me or it may be plain nonsense. Is it nonsense, or, if it is not nonsense, what does it mean. That was what i was asking.

If it is nonsense i will be quite happy and there is no more to be said.

Matheinste.
 
  • #7
Well I think you can measure light speed in any length you chose, that is arbitrary, whether it's chains per second, or furlongs per second or whatever. I think it might be a misunderstanding with the text. If the metre is defined as x, and light speed as c, then by definition it must be cx/t. But you could substitute x with anything and t likewise, provided it agreed with what we observe, and what we observe are observed in terms or related to d and t, the units are arbitrary, you could use [itex]\sigma[/itex] and [itex]\tau[/itex] if you wanted, whatever you wanted them to be. c however is a constant, so we assume it is constant regardless of x and t, it could change over time, but there's no way of knowing that.
 
  • #8
matheinste said:
As stressed by Leon Hsu, "The Principle of Relativity implies that the speed of light is a universal constant if and only if time is measured in units of meters"
It is nonsense. First, in the SI system of units time is measured in units of seconds, not meters. Second, although the principle of relativity is a tautology for the SI system (using today's definition of the meter) it applies for all systems of units (including older versions of the SI system).
 
  • #9
Thankyou both for clearing that up.

I am glad that someone else thinks it is nonsense.

Matheinste.
 

What is the meaning of "constant c" in science?

In science, "constant c" refers to the speed of light in a vacuum, which is approximately 299,792,458 meters per second. It is denoted by the letter c and is considered to be a fundamental constant in the universe.

Why is the speed of light considered to be a constant?

The speed of light is considered to be a constant because it has been measured to have the same value in all reference frames, regardless of the relative motion of the observer or the source of light. This is one of the fundamental principles of the theory of relativity.

What is the significance of the constant c in Einstein's theory of relativity?

In Einstein's theory of relativity, the constant c plays a crucial role in determining the relationship between space and time. It is used to calculate the time dilation and length contraction of objects moving at high speeds, as well as the equivalence of mass and energy in the famous equation E=mc².

How is the constant c related to the electromagnetic spectrum?

The constant c is the speed at which electromagnetic radiation, including light, travels in a vacuum. This means that all forms of electromagnetic radiation, from radio waves to gamma rays, travel at the same speed of approximately 299,792,458 meters per second.

Can the constant c ever be exceeded?

According to the theory of relativity, the constant c represents the maximum achievable speed in the universe. This means that it cannot be exceeded by any object with mass. However, there are theoretical concepts such as wormholes that may allow for faster-than-light travel, but they have not been proven to exist.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
64
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
160
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
74
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top