- #141
MTd2
Gold Member
- 2,028
- 25
My goal is just to understand you Seriously.
arivero said:I suspect it too, and more now that we have involved the scalars in the gauge supermultiplets, as this is an extra condition overdetermining the equations.
arivero said:What we have found, and that is the surprising fact, is that flavour on these five quarks in fact builds again, not the original five, but all [the partners of] the six quarks, the leptons, and really all the bosons you should expect in susy.
MTd2 said:But this what I was talking about! These guys seem to be "fermionic charges", something like preons, that build fermions and they do not seem to be like partners at all. There is supersymmetry, but it is in the equivalence of the 5 "charges" used to build the fermions and the 5 charges carried by forces (bosons).
tom.stoer said:Holography today is - in my opinion - like scratching at the surface hiding a fundamental principle still to be fully understood; like Mach's principle was a guideline for Einstein which did not made to a fundamental principle in GR (... he must so to speak throw away the ladder, after he has climbed up on it ...); nevertheless holography is certainly some aspect of reality b/c it shows up in so different approaches so that it's hard to deny that there is something fundamental behind it.
...
So for me holography is a concept or a guideline pointing towards a fundamental principle, whereas gravitons are a rather limit calculational tool valid only in a rather limited regime.