Register to reply

Would it have been cheaper to bail out the financial sector or subsudize the recovery

by Pattonias
Tags: bail out
Share this thread:
Mar6-12, 10:08 AM
Pattonias's Avatar
P: 378
I've been wondering if it would have been cheaper to bail out the financial sector and prop up the mortgage system that was created by the failed financial sector, or would it have been cheaper to help those who lost their jobs stay on their feet until the market shifted to fill the gap?

Not an easy question I know.

You can't take the governments moves over the last 10 years for face value as you have to consider the political implication of every move they make.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
Scientists discover RNA modifications in some unexpected places
Scientists discover tropical tree microbiome in Panama
'Squid skin' metamaterials project yields vivid color display
Mar6-12, 10:30 AM
Pattonias's Avatar
P: 378
A starting point...

A reasonable estimate of the Bailouts Thus Far

United States Population
Mar6-12, 12:02 PM
P: 22,313
That link is out of date and it is worth noting that most of the financial "bailouts" are more accurately described as loans or investments. The difference being that the government expected at least some of the money back. TARP, for example, had a projected cost as of a year ago of $19 billion, despite having laid out hundreds of billions of dollars.

Now of course direct subsidies may pay back too, but even if they do it takes longer and is impossible to determine with any precision how much.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Can i work in the financial sector after Bsc maths and physics? Career Guidance 17
Sexual solicitation of a schoolgirl let off with $500 bail General Discussion 12
Julian Assange Out On Bail. Current Events 16
Financial Math - For people who need help with Financial math related problems. General Math 7
Should the government bail out GM? Current Events 59