- #1
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
- 4,446
- 558
Please stand up and be counted, if you think you do
I have a take on every thing, so i guess the odds are my take pre dated yours
wolram said:I have a take on every thing, so i guess the odds are my take pre dated yours
What do you think of Struensee?wolram said:I have a take on every thing, so i guess the odds are my take pre dated yours
arildno said:What do you think of Struensee?
Ki Man said:if you know everything please explain to me the politics of the vietnam war in depth
Carolina Mathilda was bored, I think..wolram said:Vanessa, a very busy lady.
Eat a chocolate.Lisa! said:What am I going to do now?
Evo said:Chocolate beer.
Andy said:Thats good guessing, i know both of them! And its not earlyiif you going to have dinner at the pub first.
Hijimmie how are you wearing.jimmie said:Hello wolram.
Andy said:The bold forester and I am thinking about having the gammon steak, with a chocolate brownie sundae for desert but I am not too sure yet.
jimmie said:I am glad to hear any individual say they are fine.
So, wolram, you may or may not be aware but, the studio audience is awaiting your response to my orginal reply to your thread.
Have you considered my reply?
jimmie said:I "take" it you are not able to EXPLAIN "everything".
An acronym, wolram, is not an explanation, but you "know" that.
If it was possible to travel in "time", and it is not, would you wolram, have intended to be a humble and joyful individual that gladly shared with other individuals ORIGINAL thoughts on any particular subject, rather than an individual that is so full of arrogance and demands so much attention for his "self" that he would create a thread on a public forum proclaiming his ability to "know-it-all", only to spew abbreviated sentences and tired old acronyms, without SINCERITY. And, by demanding attention to his self, rendered him FULLY EXPOSED to any "challenge" that he puts forth.
Now, wolram, everyone on the planet that has access to the internet and can understand english is aware that the individual behind the word "wolram", on Physics Forums, in fact does NOT "know-it-all", and that ultimately, your conceded belief that was not "right" obligates every individual that intends to believe what you say to contemplate the question, "wolram was not 'right' then, is he not 'right' now?"
Credibility is everything.
wolram, can you "not wise"? You "know" you can.
There are multiple ways to prove your knowledge, including taking tests, participating in research projects, presenting your findings, and publishing articles in scientific journals.
The purpose of proving knowledge is to demonstrate your understanding and expertise in a particular subject, which can lead to career advancement, increased credibility, and opportunities for further research and collaboration.
To prepare to prove your knowledge, you should review and study the relevant material, practice with sample questions and tasks, seek feedback from peers and mentors, and stay up-to-date with current research and developments in the field.
Yes, you can prove your knowledge in multiple areas of science. Many scientists have expertise in multiple subjects and may choose to demonstrate their knowledge in different areas through tests, publications, and other methods.
The frequency of proving your knowledge may vary depending on your career goals and field of study. Some scientists may choose to prove their knowledge periodically to maintain their credentials, while others may only do so when seeking new opportunities or advancements in their careers.