- #1
MadMarvin
- 2
- 0
Hi,
I'm currently recalibrating an optical tweezer for my undergraduate thesis. The alignment did turn out well so far but I'm a little bit concerned about the power loss within the microscope (here's a picture of the relevant part, without prisms).
I read in a paper that 20 to 100mW are sufficient for most basic applications. I measured the power at different points (the condenser is not fully aligned yet):
Before TL2: 105 mW
After L_BFP: 10-20 mW, depending on how well the immersion oil works.
Is that enough? I use a DIC microscope, so the light passes two DMs, two prisms, objective, condenser and their respective apertures. The beam has been expanded to roughly 3,5mm, so I did not expect the power after L_BFP to be very high. But 10 mW seems too low.
Also, I haven't inserted the quadrant photo diode yet. My advisor thinks it should be placed a good deal before the focal point of L_BFP - shouldn't it be placed a little bit behind?
I'm currently recalibrating an optical tweezer for my undergraduate thesis. The alignment did turn out well so far but I'm a little bit concerned about the power loss within the microscope (here's a picture of the relevant part, without prisms).
I read in a paper that 20 to 100mW are sufficient for most basic applications. I measured the power at different points (the condenser is not fully aligned yet):
Before TL2: 105 mW
After L_BFP: 10-20 mW, depending on how well the immersion oil works.
Is that enough? I use a DIC microscope, so the light passes two DMs, two prisms, objective, condenser and their respective apertures. The beam has been expanded to roughly 3,5mm, so I did not expect the power after L_BFP to be very high. But 10 mW seems too low.
Also, I haven't inserted the quadrant photo diode yet. My advisor thinks it should be placed a good deal before the focal point of L_BFP - shouldn't it be placed a little bit behind?