# Quadratic inequalities for complex variables?

by mathsciguy
 P: 132 Hello, I was looking at Riley's solution manual for this specific problem. Along the way, he ended up with a quadratic inequality: how.bmp If you looked at the image, he said it is given that λ is real, but he asserted that λ has no real roots because of the inequality. Doesn't that mean λ is imaginary or complex in some points then, contradicting his first statement? I reckon this has something to do with the properties of a quadratic inequality for complex variables.
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 944
 Quote by mathsciguy Hello, I was looking at Riley's solution manual for this specific problem. Along the way, he ended up with a quadratic inequality: Attachment 61729 If you looked at the image, he said it is given that λ is real, but he asserted that λ has no real roots because of the inequality. Doesn't that mean λ is imaginary or complex in some points then, contradicting his first statement? I reckon this has something to do with the properties of a quadratic inequality for complex variables.
$\lambda$ doesn't have roots; it's an arbitrary real number. The quadratic $P: z \mapsto az^2 + bz + c$ has roots, which are those $z \in \mathbb{C}$ for which $P(z) = 0$. The point is that if $P(\lambda) > 0$ for all real $\lambda$ then $P$ has no real roots, because if $z$ is real then $P(z) \neq 0$ and $z$ cannot be a root of $P$.
 P: 132 That's cool, I get it now. Then that means the roots are either purely imaginary or complex (but not purely real) right? Then why is it required that the discriminant be less than zero? Is it because it will make sure that part of the solution will have an imaginary part?
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 944