Faster than the speed of light

In summary: It's just that the geodesic it travels along is curved due to the mass of the object.Sorry for the confusion.In summary, some scientists believe that it is not possible for anything with mass to go faster than the speed of light. However, things without mass, such as certain types of waves, can theoretically exceed the speed of light. Light itself does not accelerate, but is always emitted at the speed of light. The concept of a "slot" that always travels at the speed of light, regardless of whether it is occupied by a photon, is also discussed. Additionally, the effects of gravity on light and the possibility of using the slingshot effect to accelerate light are mentioned.
  • #106
epenguin said:
Antymattar said:
Funny thing is that the speed of light has been observed to be slowing down.
The speed of light is calculated using atomic clocks. Scientists have observed that, in fact, either the atomic orbits are slowing down, or the speed of light is slowing down because every once in a while you have to change the calculations to accurately fit the atomic clocks.

Is that true and accepted? Sounds like a big thing for a throwaway comment.
I'm guessing that Antymattar is getting confused with the leap second which we need to occasionally add to compensate for the fact that the Earth's rotation is very gradually slowing down. The second is defined using atomic clocks, not the Earth's rotation which is no longer reliable enough for accurate timing, which is why we have to add leap seconds to compensate.

Technically it's impossible for the speed of light to slow down since 1983, when the new definition of the metre fixed the speed of light at 299,792,458 m/s precisely.
 

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
290
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
640
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
1K
Back
Top